Richard Blumenthal

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal
United States Senate

United States Senator (Democratic) from Connecticut.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Richard Blumenthal

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Connecticut

Condemned

Statement summary

Richard Blumenthal voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Blumenthal said Flock-style surveillance needs stronger accountability and suggested a possible warrant requirement, limits on data retention, and a prohibition or safeguards for a national database. He did not call for every license-plate reader to be removed.

“Prohibiting or safeguarding against a national database.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Always Watching: Congress Begins Investigating Flock CamerasA Bipartisan Solution Might Be Possible
Why we used this label

He proposes restrictions on networked surveillance without endorsing a ban on all readers.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. Senator (D-Conn.) and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, as quoted by Roll Call, that "we have a real duty to investigate" what he called blatant corruption dangerous to national security, like the Trump Jr. wedding gift.

“We have a real duty to investigate all of this just absolutely blatant corruption that’s so dangerous to our national security, like the Trump Jr. wedding gift.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Not a ‘toaster’: GOP senator urges Judiciary panel to probe Don Jr. wedding party · Roll CallParagraph beginning "But several Democrats on the committee said they welcomed the call," and the quotation that follows
Why we used this label

The case's reference point is the Kremlev-funded celebration for Donald Trump Jr. and whether the Senate Judiciary Committee should investigate it. Blumenthal, a Judiciary Committee member, calls corruption like the Trump Jr. wedding gift blatant and dangerous to national security and says there is a real duty to investigate it. That expressly criticizes the conduct under scrutiny and backs an inquiry, so we labeled it Condemned.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. Senator (D-CT)

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Richard Blumenthal pressed Kash Patel on whether it would be illegal to send FBI agents to polling places; after Patel said "I don't know that we can't legally do it," Blumenthal said he was "dissatisfied" that Patel could not give an "unequivocal" commitment to keep the FBI out of election interference.

“Well, I'm dissatisfied that you are unable to give us an unequivocal, clear, unambiguous commitment that the FBI will be kept out of election interference.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Kash Patel clashes with Dems about possibly sending FBI agents to polling places
Why we used this label

Blumenthal directly condemns Patel's non-answer on whether the FBI could legally send agents to polling places, explicitly saying he was 'dissatisfied' by the lack of an unequivocal commitment -- a condemnation of Patel's response relevant to the case's central question.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Connecticut

Condemned

Statement summary

Richard Blumenthal voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator questioning the homeland security secretary at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

Condemned

Statement summary

Blumenthal said it was wrong for the agent to shoot Martinez and then brag about the shooting.

“I don't know why you can't join me in saying it was wrong to shoot Marimar, almost cause her death, and then brag about it.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Blumenthal questions Noem about constitutional violations and abuse by DHS agents · Richard BlumenthalFull transcript, exchange concerning Marimar Martinez
Why we used this label

Blumenthal explicitly said the shooting was wrong, so the statement directly condemns the use of force.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut, in a press release

Condemned

Response to this claim

Doug Burgum said the offshore-wind pause, which included Revolution Wind, addressed emerging national-security risks from evolving adversary technology and projects near East Coast population centers.

“Once again, a court has struck down Trump’s senseless stop work order on Revolution Wind because the administration has failed to produce a single shred of evidence to support its fantastical claims.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Blumenthal Statement on Preliminary Injunction for Revolution Wind · Richard BlumenthalPress release published January 12, 2026; statement attributed to Sen. Richard Blumenthal, first quoted paragraph
Why we used this label

Blumenthal says the administration supplied no evidence for its claims and calls the order senseless. He rejects the basis for the action itself, which is more than a dispute over terminology.

Topics in this coverage