Richard Blumenthal

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal
United States Senate

Richard Blumenthal is a Democratic U.S. senator from Connecticut, first elected in 2010 and reelected in 2016 and 2022. He was Connecticut's attorney general from 1991 to 2011 and U.S. attorney for Connecticut from 1977 to 1981, and he served in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve from 1970 to 1976.

What we have documented

We have documented statements by Richard Blumenthal on 2026 Midterm Elections, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow "Should the U.S. lift sanctions on Russian diesel to bring down fuel prices?" and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 27 topics

Statements by Richard Blumenthal

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut

Condemned

Statement summary

At a Hartford media briefing on the day Massie moved to force a House vote, Blumenthal said impeachment of Hegseth should begin that day and that Republicans faced an immediate test.

“I think we should begin impeachment today of Pete Hegseth, that's where we should begin”
Open source (opens in a new tab)NBC Connecticut: Blumenthal says begin impeachment of Pete Hegseth todayFull article
Why we used this label

On whether Hegseth should be impeached, Blumenthal says the process should start at once.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut, speaking at an Election Day event in New Haven

Condemned

Statement summary

At an Election Day event in New Haven, Blumenthal describes the visits of federal election monitors to local polling places as federal interference and tells the monitors they are not needed in the city or the state.

“We don't need you in New Haven. We don't need you in Connecticut”
Open source (opens in a new tab)U.S. Justice Dept. monitors arrive at voting sites in New HavenFull article
Why we used this label

The case asks whether DOJ should send election monitors to all 50 states. Blumenthal calls the monitors' polling-place visits federal interference by the Trump administration and says New Haven and Connecticut do not need them.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut

Condemned

Statement summary

Blumenthal says Google is putting profits over people by blocking schools from Google Search unless they opt into its AI, and is more concerned with pushing Gemini into schools than with helping students succeed.

“Google is once again prioritizing profits over people—this time blocking schools from using Google Search unless they opt into their A.I. overview. Clearly, the Tech Giant is more concerned with forcing Gemini into schools than enabling students to succeed”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Richard Blumenthal X post on Google's school Search policy · Richard BlumenthalFull post
Why we used this label

The reference point is Google's school access policy for Search and its AI tools. Blumenthal says Google is prioritizing profits over people and forcing Gemini into schools, which expressly criticizes the policy.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut, writing to the managing director of Eastern Mediterranean Maritime

Condemned

Statement summary

In an October 27 letter to the owner of the Agioi Fanendes, Sen. Richard Blumenthal says a presidential license cannot make a Russian diesel delivery legal and that only Congress can. He urges the company to recall the tanker.

“The President may have given a license to facilitate this transaction, but only Congress can make it legally valid.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)gCaptain: Blumenthal demands that a Russian diesel tanker turn aroundFull article, October 28, 2026
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the U.S. should ease sanctions on Russian diesel to lower fuel prices. Blumenthal argues that the license cannot override the 2022 import ban and asks the shipowner to turn back, which rejects the easing.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations ranking member

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Richard Blumenthal raises concerns about undisclosed ballroom donors and seeks records about solicitations, promised benefits and contacts with the administration.

“The aggressive fundraising push by the President’s advisors suggests possible conflicts of interest and even corruption, and raises questions that Americans deserve to have answered.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Blumenthal Presses Secret White House Ballroom Donors After New Details Emerge About $330 Million Fundraising Campaign for Trump's Pet ProjectOpening announcement and reproduced letter to Marc Benioff
Why we used this label

The reference is private funding of the ballroom by parties with government interests. Blumenthal criticizes the arrangement as presenting possible conflicts, without declaring corruption proved.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Connecticut; signatory to the joint October 15 letter

Condemned

Statement summary

Richard Blumenthal signed a joint letter with eight other senators requesting an inspector-general investigation into reported Starshield restrictions and intelligence-warning disruptions in Ukraine. The letter questions Defense Department oversight and asks whether government or contractor decisions contributed.

“Any restrictions on these capabilities, particularly without advance notification, raise serious questions about the Department of Defense’s contractual oversight and its responsibility to ensure continuity of essential services.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Nine senators request an investigation of Ukraine communications disruptionsPages 1-2: concerns and investigation requests; page 3: nine signatures
Why we used this label

The reference point is the restriction and its oversight. The signers criticize the lack of notice and question the Department of Defense response. Their investigation request leaves the cause and responsible officials unresolved.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Connecticut and a sponsor of the Russia sanctions law, in a post on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Richard Blumenthal said the decision to lift sanctions on Russian diesel is an embarrassment and makes the United States complicit in Putin's war against Ukraine.

“The President’s decision to lift sanctions on Russian diesel is an embarrassment & makes us complicit in Putin’s war against Ukraine.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Sen. Richard Blumenthal's post on lifting sanctions on Russian diesel (X post) · Richard BlumenthalFull post, Oct. 9, 2026, 5:04 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the U.S. should ease sanctions on Russian diesel to lower fuel prices, as the administration did on October 9. Blumenthal calls the decision "an embarrassment" that "makes us complicit" in Russia's war against Ukraine. That opposes the easing, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because the post contains no support for the decision.

Portrait of Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal

Role at the time: U.S. senator for Connecticut

Condemned

Statement summary

Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker and Alex Padilla wrote to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin on October 5, 2026, asking DHS to suspend field duties for ICE officers hired in the 2025 surge until background checks and training are complete. The letter states that agents rammed Durán Guerrero's vehicle and fired through it in Biddeford, and that such killings show surge hires did not receive adequate instruction in use-of-force standards.

“On July 13, 2026, an ICE officer in Biddeford, Maine fatally shot Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a 25-year-old father, in his car after agents rammed his vehicle and fired multiple rounds through it while executing a warrant for someone else. Mr. Durán Guerrero was not the target of the operation and was authorized to work in the United States. ... These killings, combined with the whistleblower's account of corners cut on both vetting and training, make clear that officers hired during the surge did not receive adequate instruction in de-escalation, use-of-force standards, and vehicle-stop protocols before being sent into communities with the authority to use deadly force.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Booker, Blumenthal, Padilla Urge Secretary Mullin to Immediately Remove ICE Officers Hired Without Background ChecksOctober 5 release: paragraphs naming Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero, followed by demands to suspend field duties pending background checks and training.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the ICE officer was justified in shooting Durán Guerrero. The letter Blumenthal signed says agents rammed Durán Guerrero's vehicle and fired through it while he was not the operation's target, and says such killings show surge hires lacked adequate use-of-force instruction. That criticizes the use of deadly force, so we labeled it Condemned. Mixed or conditional is the closest competing label; it loses because the letter sets no condition on that criticism.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated
Older cases