U.S. Politics

Public disputes concerning political parties, public officials, institutions, political conduct, and governance in the United States.

Browse cases, people, and recent statements connected to this topic. How we classify topics

Cases on this topic

Case

Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

At the September 9, 2026 Republican midterm convention, Democratic Senator John Fetterman introduced Republican Senator Dave McCormick by video and promised to cooperate with President Trump on Pennsylvania steel. Supporters welcomed cross-party cooperation; critics said the campaign-stage appearance helped an administration his voters expected him to oppose. Fetterman subsequently reaffirmed his Democratic identity.

Case

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

At an Atlanta reelection rally, Senator Jon Ossoff said President Donald Trump did not want to do the work of the presidency and instead wanted to build a ballroom and “travel with Natalie” on a Qatari aircraft. Trump allies accused Ossoff of misogyny and of implying an affair with White House aide Natalie Harp. Ossoff did not apologize and said senior White House aides are powerful taxpayer-paid public officials whose influence is fair to scrutinize.

Recent statements

Brendan Boyle

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. representative commenting through his congressional-branded account

September 10, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"Trump’s favorite Democrat"

Why we used this label

Expressly connects a critical characterization to that night's act.

Boyle reacts to Fetterman's convention appearance

Read statement

Jessica Tarlov

Jon Favreau

More people and organizations

Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Malcolm Kenyatta

Role at the time: Pennsylvania state representative commenting on X

September 9, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"John is Benedict Arnold, but lazy."

Why we used this label

An explicit adverse interpretation of the convention appearance, not an inference from his party affiliation.

Kenyatta characterizes Fetterman's appearance as betrayal

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Mark Ruffalo

Role at the time: Actor and activist speaking personally about media ownership and political influence

September 9, 2026Defended or excused

Responding to

Did Mark Ruffalo’s Paramount–Warner criticism invoke antisemitic tropes?

"in light of Paramount’s newest moves I think it’s important to repost this."

Why we used this label

His new accompanying text defends continued scrutiny and renews the corporate-focused argument; it does not expressly repeat an answer to every antisemitism criticism.

Mark Ruffalo renews scrutiny of the Ellisons' relationship with TrumpRuffalo's new text accompanying a repost of older material

Read statement Did Mark Ruffalo’s Paramount–Warner criticism invoke antisemitic tropes?

Joyce Haas

Role at the time: Centre County Republican alternate delegate interviewed by Newsweek

September 9, 2026Defended or excused

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"good for us both ways"

Why we used this label

Explicitly approves cooperation without demanding a switch.

Pennsylvania Republican delegates welcome Fetterman without requiring a party switch

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

John Fetterman

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. senator issuing a later statement

September 9, 2026Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Fetterman said the convention appearance did not change his Democratic identity.

"We are in different parties, but we are both Team PA"

Why we used this label

An actual post-backlash rebuttal to interpretations that the appearance meant abandonment of his party.

Fetterman defends convention remarks and reaffirms Democratic affiliation

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Amber Martin

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

September 9, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"exactly what's needed in our country"

Why we used this label

Positive response qualified by acceptance of his remaining a Democrat.

Pennsylvania Republican delegates welcome Fetterman without requiring a party switch

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Guy Ciarrocchi

Role at the time: Pennsylvania Republican convention delegate interviewed by Newsweek

September 9, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Republicans could welcome Fetterman's cooperation without asking him to leave the Democratic Party.

"the two parties find a way to work together"

Why we used this label

Supports the appearance while qualifying what Republicans should seek next.

Pennsylvania Republican delegates welcome Fetterman without requiring a party switch

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Tré Easton

Role at the time: Former Fetterman legislative aide speaking to NBC News in his own capacity

September 9, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"to see it executed at this scale is really stunning"

Why we used this label

Direct criticism of this appearance's conduct and political judgment.

Former aide Trè Easton criticizes Fetterman's convention appearance

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Mike Johnson

Role at the time: House speaker speaking in a Fox News interview

September 9, 2026Defended or excused

Responding to

Introducing McCormick at the Republican convention was consistent with Fetterman's stated aim of cross-party cooperation for Pennsylvania's steel industry.

"an example of common sense"

Why we used this label

Defends the senator in the context of the convention appearance and locates responsibility for the split with Democratic critics.

Mike Johnson praises Fetterman's common-sense position

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

John Fetterman

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. senator addressing the Republican convention by recorded video

September 9, 2026Defended or excused

Responding to

Introducing McCormick at the Republican convention was consistent with Fetterman's stated aim of cross-party cooperation for Pennsylvania's steel industry.

"we’ll work with President Trump to fight and defend the steel way of life"

Why we used this label

Records his rationale within the disputed act, not a later answer to critics.

John Fetterman’s complete prerecorded introduction of Dave McCormick at the GOP midterm convention

Read statement Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

Trey Walsh

Role at the time: Cryptocurrency and political commentator

September 8, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Hunter Biden’s $LAPTOP memecoin launch

"Are we allowed to say the quiet part out loud here? That Hunter is a weirdo and his redemption tour is egomaniacal and the Bidens as a whole should still be persona non grata?"

Why we used this label

The statement is a direct negative judgment of Hunter Biden’s redemption tour in the context of the token launch, though it does not make a specific fraud allegation about the token.

Hunter Biden to Launch Trump-Esque Crypto Token Following Online Media Tour

Read statement Hunter Biden’s $LAPTOP memecoin launch

Sarah Longwell

Role at the time: Publisher, The Bulwark; host, The Focus Group

September 1, 2026Minimized

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Personally I think everyone should ignore him. He’s not an important figure in politics."

Why we used this label

She addresses the attention the dispute deserves, not the truth of the competing interpretations.

Sarah Longwell response to Hasan Piker discourseX post

Read statement Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

Johnny Olszewski

Role at the time: United States representative

September 1, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"What Laura Loomer said was disgusting. It was vile."

Why we used this label

Direct condemnation by an elected official.

CNN The Arena transcript — Loomer remarks and Olszewski responseSegment on Loomer and Angie Nixon

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Audie Cornish

Role at the time: CNN anchor and journalist

September 1, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"It’s depressing for me to wake up and see something like that."

Why we used this label

Editorial condemnation grounded in the treatment of Black women.

CNN The Arena transcript — Loomer remarks and Olszewski responseSegment on Loomer and Angie Nixon

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Abby Phillip

Role at the time: CNN host and journalist

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Loomer is facing backlash for dropping these racist attacks."

Why we used this label

Editorial characterization by the host rather than an official political statement.

CNN NewsNight transcript — Loomer remarks and panel reactionsLines 209–284; Loomer clip and panel discussion

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

May Mailman

Role at the time: Former Trump policy official and commentator

August 31, 2026Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Yes. Go condemn Laura Loomer."

Why we used this label

Contains an explicit condemnation but pairs it with minimizing and consistency arguments.

CNN NewsNight transcript — Loomer remarks and panel reactionsLines 209–284; Loomer clip and panel discussion

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Noah Rothman

Role at the time: Conservative writer and commentator

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Those are vile comments. A long history of similar vile comments. She deserves to be cast out."

Why we used this label

Explicit conservative condemnation.

CNN NewsNight transcript — Loomer remarks and panel reactionsLines 209–284; Loomer clip and panel discussion

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Isaiah Martin

Role at the time: Democratic activist and commentator

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Trump absolutely should go and disown Laura Loomer."

Why we used this label

Direct call for repudiation.

CNN NewsNight transcript — Loomer remarks and panel reactionsLines 209–284; Loomer clip and panel discussion

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Shermichael Singleton

Role at the time: Republican strategist and CNN commentator

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"What Laura Loomer said is despicable. It doesn’t stand for the party."

Why we used this label

Explicit conservative condemnation and party distancing.

CNN discussion — Republican responses and Ashley Moody statusSegment discussing Loomer, Nixon, and party reactions

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Rashida Tlaib

Role at the time: United States representative

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

The absence of comparable Republican condemnation reflects a political double standard in reactions to inflammatory online figures.

"I’m going to check to see if you said anything about Laura Loomer calling a Black woman running for Senate…"

Why we used this label

The statement treats Loomer’s conduct as condemnable and principally advances a consistency argument.

CNN NewsNight transcript — Loomer remarks and panel reactionsLines 209–284; Loomer clip and panel discussion

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Hakeem Jeffries

Role at the time: House Democratic leader

August 31, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Laura Loomer is a stone-cold racist, pathological liar and nutjob."

Why we used this label

Explicit party-leadership condemnation.

Hakeem Jeffries calls Loomer a stone-cold racistReport reproducing Jeffries post

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Role at the time: Former Republican member of Congress

August 30, 2026Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"I 1000% denounce Laura Loomer and her nasty, hateful, racists comments."

Why we used this label

Explicit cross-partisan denunciation.

Loomer and Greene feud over remarks about Angie NixonFull report and reproduced posts

Read statement Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Dan Pfeiffer

Role at the time: Co-host, Pod Save America

August 28, 2026Minimized

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"People condemning Hasan, people condemning the people condemning Hasan and Hasan himself should move on and stop fighting about this."

Why we used this label

The statement treats continuation of the dispute as unproductive while withholding a clear verdict on the passage.

Pod Save America: Lake America Great Again00:51:41

Read statement Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

Jessica Tarlov

Role at the time: Co-host, The Five

August 27, 2026Minimized

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"We are now on day a million … It is exhausting."

Why we used this label

Her statement expresses fatigue with the dispute and does not amount to condemnation or defense.

The Five — Jessica Tarlov reaction00:06:49–00:08:01

Read statement Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

Older statements

U.S. Politics

People and organizations

Cases on this topic

Recent statements