All topics

Public Health

Public disputes concerning population health, disease prevention, environmental exposure, overdose trends, and public-health responses.

Published coverage on this page: 4+ cases · 24+ statements. Statements are ordered newest first.

Topic updates

Follow this topic

Get free email updates about Public Health. We will email you when we add or correct a case in this topic.

Enable JavaScript to request email updates about this topic.

We will send a confirmation email first. Every update email has a link to stop. How we handle your email.

Related cases

More cases

Statements

Filter by response label

Labels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.

76 matching statements

Lori Kalani

Role at the time: DraftKings chief responsible gaming officer

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Kalani tells Louisiana regulators that out-of-control gambling is against the company's interests. She describes interventions, limits and account closures intended to protect customers.

“It does us no good to have people who are gambling out of control, spending more than they can afford to lose, it just doesn’t make sense.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Louisiana Regulators Delay Full DraftKings License Renewal Amid ...October 15 Louisiana Gaming Control Board hearing; Liberman and Kalani remarks

What this label refers to

Relative to criticism of DraftKings' treatment of vulnerable gamblers, Kalani defends the company's incentives and protective practices.

Paul Liberman

Role at the time: DraftKings co-founder and president of operations at the hearing

Denied

Statement summary

Liberman tells Louisiana regulators that DraftKings does not target customers or segments on the basis of their losses. He argues that most customers spend more than they win, making loss alone an unhelpful targeting distinction.

“But we don’t use that, once again, to target in any way a particular customer or customer segment because we don’t think that that’s relevant.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Louisiana Regulators Delay Full DraftKings License Renewal Amid ...October 15 Louisiana Gaming Control Board hearing; Liberman and Kalani remarks

What this label refers to

Relative to allegations that DraftKings uses customer losses for targeting, Liberman directly denies the practice.

Portrait of Mike Rogers

Mike Rogers

Role at the time: Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Condemned

Response to this claim

Families would be permitted to retain private health insurance under Abdul El-Sayed's Medicare for All proposal.

“taking over your private health insurance and giving it to the government.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed, Rogers offer insults, answers at US Senate debateHealthcare section and closing statements; original debate aired October 8
Why we used this label

He directly criticizes the healthcare proposal under scrutiny.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Families would be permitted to retain private health insurance under Abdul El-Sayed's Medicare for All proposal.

“If families want to keep their private health insurance, that’s fine by me”
Open source (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed, Rogers offer insults, answers at US Senate debateHealthcare section and closing statements; original debate aired October 8
Why we used this label

He explains and defends the healthcare proposal at the center of the case.

Portrait of Matt Bruenig

Matt Bruenig

Role at the time: Labor lawyer and president of People's Policy Project

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Bruenig argues that legally allowing duplicative private insurance would not make it commercially viable alongside automatic, tax-funded public coverage.

“Formally permitting duplicative insurance while making it uneconomical for anyone to buy or sell it unlocks certain rhetoric”
Open source (opens in a new tab)What is a Public Option?

What this label refers to

He challenges the practical meaning of keeping private insurance while recognizing that the proposal would formally permit it.

Logo of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Role at the time: U.S. federal public health agency, in a post on X

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

A woman who worked at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute died of plague in Shelekhov in the night of October 2, 2026, according to People of Baikal, which noted that officials had not confirmed plague.

“CDC is aware of and closely monitoring reports of a suspected case of pneumonic plague in the Irkutsk region of Russia that resulted in a death.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)CDC post on X about a suspected pneumonic plague case in IrkutskPost by @CDCgov, October 6, 2026, 18:03 UTC.
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee was plague. The CDC describes a suspected case of pneumonic plague and says its circumstances remain unconfirmed, which treats plague as possible but unconfirmed, so we labeled it Mixed or conditional, as we did for the State Department's similar statement. The closest competing label is Condemned, which would require the CDC to assert that the illness was plague; it does not. Evidence: the CDC's own post on X.

Sara Geoghegan

Role at the time: Director of EPIC's Consumer Privacy Program and senior counsel, in an emailed statement

Condemned

Statement summary

Sara Geoghegan, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Consumer Privacy Program, told Dispute Index that a business model that profiles users with their personal information for targeted advertising is inherently exploitative, that programmatic advertising using sensitive personal data is predatory, and that a human person must be responsible for the resulting harms.

“Programmatic advertising that processes users' sensitive personal data is predatory and a human person must be responsible for the very real harms that real people are suffering due to these predatory practices.”
Read the full email
This business model in which users' personal information is collected and used to profile them for targeted advertising purposes is inherently exploitative. Programmatic advertising that processes users' sensitive personal data is predatory and a human person must be responsible for the very real harms that real people are suffering due to these predatory practices.
Emailed statement from Sara Geoghegan of EPIC to Dispute Index on targeted gambling promotionsEmailed statement from Sara Geoghegan, October 5, 2026 (UTC).

What this label refers to

Relative to DraftKings' promotion and targeting of at-risk gamblers, Geoghegan calls profiling-based targeted and programmatic advertising exploitative and predatory and says a person must be held responsible for the harm. She was responding to a request about DraftKings and speaks about the practice generally rather than naming the company, so we labeled it Condemned.

Logo of World Health Organization

World Health Organization

Role at the time: Institutional statement to Newsweek

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

WHO said the cause of death had not been officially confirmed and laboratory testing was underway. It asked Russian authorities to verify the event.

“no cause of death has been officially confirmed”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)WHO says cause of Irkutsk worker's death remains unconfirmed · NewsweekArticle published October 5, 2026 at 9:57 a.m. EDT, updated 11:41 a.m. EDT. Opening WHO statement and the final three paragraphs of the section What Did The WHO Say?

What this label refers to

WHO challenges the reported plague diagnosis by stating that the cause remains unconfirmed.

Portrait of Dmitry Peskov

Dmitry Peskov

Role at the time: Press secretary of the President of Russia, answering journalists' questions in a conference call

Explicitly stayed out

Response to this claim

An employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute has been diagnosed with pneumonia of unknown etiology, expanded testing of her material found no microorganisms connected to her professional activity, and a biosafety commission found no emergency situations in work with pathogenic microorganisms at the institute, Rospotrebnadzor said on October 4, 2026.

Quotation excerpt

“In this case, the lead agency with competence in this area is Rospotrebnadzor. And it is Rospotrebnadzor's official statements that one should rely on, without listening to various rumors, various speculation and so on. There is…”
Read full quotation
“In this case, the lead agency with competence in this area is Rospotrebnadzor. And it is Rospotrebnadzor's official statements that one should rely on, without listening to various rumors, various speculation and so on. There is Rospotrebnadzor, where highly qualified professionals in this field work (Translated from Russian. Original: В данном случае головное ведомство, которое компетентно в этой области, - это Роспотребнадзор. И именно на официальные заявления Роспотребнадзора нужно ориентироваться, не слушая разные слухи, разные рассуждения и так далее. Есть Роспотребнадзор, где работают высокие профессионалы в этой области)”
Open source (opens in a new tab)RIA Novosti, October 5, 2026: Peskov urged people to follow official statements on the situation in the Angara region (Песков призвал слушать официальные заявления по ситуации в Приангарье)Second paragraph, quotation attributed to Peskov
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. Peskov answers a question about whether the Kremlin is following the situation by naming Rospotrebnadzor as the competent agency and urging reliance on its statements, without saying what the illness was, so we used Explicitly stayed out. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, because he refers to rumors and speculation. We did not use it because the passages we found do not say which accounts he means and do not dispute plague by name.

Portrait of Igor Kobzev

Igor Kobzev

Role at the time: Governor of Irkutsk Oblast, in a post on his official Telegram channel

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Governor Igor Kobzev wrote on his Telegram channel on October 5, 2026 that expanded laboratory tests found no microorganisms connected to the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee's work in her biomaterials and that the cause of her death was pneumonia of unknown etiology. He wrote that no further institute employees had sought medical help and that the situation was stable. The post does not mention plague.

Quotation excerpt

“According to their results, no microorganisms associated with her professional activity were found in the young woman's biomaterials. The cause of her death was pneumonia of unknown etiology. (Translated from Russian. Original: По их…”
Read full quotation
“According to their results, no microorganisms associated with her professional activity were found in the young woman's biomaterials. The cause of her death was pneumonia of unknown etiology. (Translated from Russian. Original: По их результатам сообщается, что в биоматериалах девушки не обнаружено микроорганизмов, связанных с ее профессиональной деятельностью. Причина ее смерти – пневмония неустановленной этиологии.)”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Igor Kobzev on Telegram, October 5, 2026: post on the sanitary and epidemiological situationPost 17980, 08:50 UTC, second paragraph

What this label refers to

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The governor gives the cause of death as pneumonia of unknown etiology, citing Rospotrebnadzor's expert commission, and does not mention plague, so we used Challenged the characterization, as with his October 4 summary. The closest competing label is Denied. It loses because he does not say the illness was not plague.

Logo of U.S. Department of State

U.S. Department of State

Role at the time: State Department spokesperson, in statements to CNN and RFE/RL on October 4, 2026; a State Department official gave the same statement to Al Jazeera (published October 5)

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

A woman who worked at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute died of plague in Shelekhov in the night of October 2, 2026, according to People of Baikal, which noted that officials had not confirmed plague.

Quotation excerpt

“We are aware of reports of a fatal case of suspected pneumonic plague in Irkutsk Oblast, Russia. … We are monitoring the situation closely with the CDC and our other interagency partners … Many details have not been confirmed. We…”
Read full quotation
“We are aware of reports of a fatal case of suspected pneumonic plague in Irkutsk Oblast, Russia. … We are monitoring the situation closely with the CDC and our other interagency partners … Many details have not been confirmed. We encourage Russian authorities to share accurate information quickly and openly.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Al Jazeera, October 5, 2026: Russian lab worker dies of suspected plague in Siberia; US monitoring case · Al JazeeraOpening paragraphs
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The statement relays reports of suspected pneumonic plague and says many details are unconfirmed, so we used Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned, which would apply if the Department asserted plague itself; it attributes the plague to reports and calls the case suspected. Explicitly stayed out loses because the Department describes what it knows and what it does not.

Portrait of Igor Kobzev

Igor Kobzev

Role at the time: Governor of Irkutsk Oblast, in his weekly summary on his official Telegram channel

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

An employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute has been diagnosed with pneumonia of unknown etiology, expanded testing of her material found no microorganisms connected to her professional activity, and a biosafety commission found no emergency situations in work with pathogenic microorganisms at the institute, Rospotrebnadzor said on October 4, 2026.

Quotation excerpt

“Under Rospotrebnadzor's strict control, preventive measures are being carried out in the region in connection with a case of illness of an employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East with pneumonia of unknown…”
Read full quotation
“Under Rospotrebnadzor's strict control, preventive measures are being carried out in the region in connection with a case of illness of an employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East with pneumonia of unknown etiology. No microorganisms associated with her professional activity were found in material from the patient. No requests for care for infectious diseases have been registered among the institute's employees over the past 10 days. All persons who had contact with the patient have been identified, examined and are under medical observation with daily laboratory tests. (Translated from Russian. Original: Под строгим контролем Роспотребнадзора в регионе проводятся профилактические мероприятия в связи со случаем заболевания сотрудницы Иркутского противочумного института Сибири и Дальнего Востока пневмонией неустановленной этиологии. В материале от больной не выявлены микроорганизмы, связанные с ее профессиональной деятельностью. Среди сотрудников института за прошедшие 10 дней обращений по поводу инфекционных заболеваний не зарегистрировано. Все контактные лица с заболевшей установлены, обследованы и находятся под медицинским наблюдением с ежедневными лабораторными исследованиями.)”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Igor Kobzev on Telegram, October 4, 2026: weekly summary of the region's main events (Подборка главных событий недели в Иркутской области) · Igor KobzevPost 17968, third item of the digest, 14:19 UTC
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The governor adopts Rospotrebnadzor's description of the illness as pneumonia of unknown etiology and does not mention plague, so we used Challenged the characterization. The closest competing label is Denied. It loses because the item does not say the illness was not plague. Explicitly stayed out is a weaker fit because he gives a diagnosis and a finding.

Logo of Rospotrebnadzor

Rospotrebnadzor

Role at the time: Press service of Russia's consumer-protection and public-health regulator, in a statement quoted by Interfax

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

An employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute has been diagnosed with pneumonia of unknown etiology, expanded testing of her material found no microorganisms connected to her professional activity, and a biosafety commission found no emergency situations in work with pathogenic microorganisms at the institute, Rospotrebnadzor said on October 4, 2026.

Quotation excerpt

“The sanitary and epidemiological situation in the Irkutsk region and the cities of Irkutsk and Shelekhov is stable. A special set of measures was organized and carried out in connection with a case of illness of an employee of the Irkutsk…”
Read full quotation
“The sanitary and epidemiological situation in the Irkutsk region and the cities of Irkutsk and Shelekhov is stable. A special set of measures was organized and carried out in connection with a case of illness of an employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East, diagnosis "pneumonia of unknown etiology" … Because of the patient's professional activity, upon receiving the information a set of anti-epidemic measures was organized and carried out immediately and in full in accordance with sanitary legislation, including identifying the widest possible circle of people who had contact with the patient and inpatient medical observation with daily laboratory tests. As a result, 2 cases of Covid-19 and 2 cases of rhinovirus infection were identified; pathogens of other infectious diseases were not found … None of the contacts showed changes in health related to infectious disease (Translated from Russian. Original: Санитарно-эпидемиологическая обстановка в Иркутской области, городах Иркутск и Шелехов стабильная. Специальный комплекс мероприятий организован и проведен в связи со случаем заболевания сотрудницы Иркутского противочумного института Сибири и Дальнего Востока, диагноз "Пневмония неустановленной этиологии" … В связи с профессиональной деятельностью заболевшей при получении информации незамедлительно и в полном объеме организован и проведен комплекс противоэпидемических мероприятий в соответствии с санитарным законодательством, в том числе выявлен максимально широкий круг лиц, контактировавших с заболевшей, медицинское наблюдение в стационаре с ежедневными лабораторными исследованиями. По результатам выявлены 2 случая Covid-19 и 2 случая риновирусной инфекции, возбудители других инфекционных болезней не обнаружены … Ни у кого из контактных изменения состояния здоровья, связанные с инфекционной патологией, не выявлены)”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Interfax: Rospotrebnadzor says the situation in Irkutsk region is stable (Роспотребнадзор заявил о стабильной обстановке в Иркутской области), October 4, 2026Paragraphs 2, 3 and 7 to 8 (statement passages in quotation marks) and the reported-speech paragraphs in between
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The statement gives a different diagnosis for the employee's illness and does not mention plague, so we used Challenged the characterization. The closest competing label is Denied. It loses because the text does not say the illness was not plague, and the finding that no microorganisms connected to her professional activity were found does not address plague by name.

Tal Brosh-Nissimov

Role at the time: Director of the infectious diseases unit at Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, as identified by Ynetnews, in an interview with Ynetnews

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

The employee allegedly broke a test tube holding the pneumonic-plague pathogen at the institute on September 25, 2026, according to an account that People of Baikal attributes to the journalist Pavel Stepanov and the outlet Mash and says has no official confirmation or independent check.

Quotation excerpt

“Let’s assume what is being reported is correct. I have no idea what the safety standards are there or what their procedures are. When people work in laboratories with dangerous bacteria, accidents happen and people are exposed. The…”
Read full quotation
“Let’s assume what is being reported is correct. I have no idea what the safety standards are there or what their procedures are. When people work in laboratories with dangerous bacteria, accidents happen and people are exposed. The description of what happened to this woman is consistent with exposure to the plague bacterium. … There are several forms of plague. The most severe, the deadliest and the most contagious is pneumonic plague. It is an extremely fast and extremely aggressive disease and the description of her deterioration within days is consistent with it. It is not certain, but it fits.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Ynetnews, October 4, 2026: Mystery in Siberia: anti-plague lab worker dies after test tube breaks, nearly 200 isolated · Ynet NewsParagraphs quoting Prof. Tal Brosh Nissimov and the paragraph on three accounts of infection
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. He opens with an express condition, that what is being reported is correct, and ends by saying it is not certain, so we used Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned, which loses because he does not assert that she had plague. Explicitly stayed out loses because he gives a substantive view of the reported facts.

Administration of the Baikalsk Urban Settlement

Role at the time: Municipal administration of Baikalsk, in a Telegram post it later deleted

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

A woman who worked at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute died of plague in Shelekhov in the night of October 2, 2026, according to People of Baikal, which noted that officials had not confirmed plague.

Quotation excerpt

“Dear residents! In connection with unofficial information about the detection of a case of human plague infection in the city of Shelekhov, we ask you to limit visits to Shelekhov and the settlements adjacent to the city until the…”
Read full quotation
“Dear residents! In connection with unofficial information about the detection of a case of human plague infection in the city of Shelekhov, we ask you to limit visits to Shelekhov and the settlements adjacent to the city until the circumstances of this threat are clarified (Translated from Russian. Original: Уважаемые жители! В связи с неофициальной информацией о выявлении в городе Шелехове факта заболевания человека инфекцией чумы, просим вас ограничить посещение Шелехова и прилегающих к городу поселений до уточнения обстоятельств по данной угрозе)”
Open source (opens in a new tab)IrCity, October 3, 2026: Baikalsk authorities asked residents not to travel to Shelekhov (Власти Байкальска попросили горожан не ездить в Шелехов)Paragraphs 1 and 2 (quotation of the administration's post)
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The administration cites unofficial information about a plague illness as the reason for its request and defers to clarification, which makes the position conditional, so we used Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned, which loses because the text labels the information unofficial and asks for the circumstances to be clarified. Explicitly stayed out loses because the text relays the information.

Portrait of Alexei Tsydenov

Alexei Tsydenov

Role at the time: Head of the Republic of Buryatia, in a post on his official Telegram channel

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

Alexei Tsydenov wrote on October 2, 2026, citing Rospotrebnadzor and the Buryatia government, that the woman he described as having died of plague in the Irkutsk region did not come to Buryatia and that Buryatia has no plague foci, including on the territory bordering Mongolia.

Quotation excerpt

“According to Rospotrebnadzor, and also according to the government of the Republic of Buryatia, the woman who possibly died of plague in the Irkutsk region did not come to Buryatia. There are no plague foci in the republic, including in the…”
Read full quotation
“According to Rospotrebnadzor, and also according to the government of the Republic of Buryatia, the woman who possibly died of plague in the Irkutsk region did not come to Buryatia. There are no plague foci in the republic, including in the territory bordering Mongolia. The source of infection was other circumstances not connected with Buryatia. I ask the media to take this information into account when publishing on this topic. (Translated from Russian. Original: По данным Роспотребнадзора, а так же по данным правительства республики Бурятия, женщина, погибшая, возможно, от чумы в Иркутской области, не приезжала в Бурятию. В республике нет очагов чумы, в том числе на территории граничащей с Монголией. Источником заражения являются иные обстоятельства не связанные с Бурятией. Прошу СМИ учитывать данную информацию при публикациях по указанной теме.)”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Alexei Tsydenov on Telegram, October 2, 2026, 14:39 UTC: the woman possibly died of plague and did not come to Buryatia (post 12153) · Alexei TsydenovPost 12153, 14:39 UTC (22:39 Buryatia)
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. The post treats plague as a possible cause of death and gives no basis, which makes the position conditional, so we used Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned, which fit his first wording and loses here because of the express qualifier. Challenged the characterization loses because he does not dispute the plague description.

Portrait of Alexei Tsydenov

Alexei Tsydenov

Role at the time: Head of the Republic of Buryatia, in a post on his VK page and MAX channel

Condemned

Response to this claim

Alexei Tsydenov wrote on October 2, 2026, citing Rospotrebnadzor and the Buryatia government, that the woman he described as having died of plague in the Irkutsk region did not come to Buryatia and that Buryatia has no plague foci, including on the territory bordering Mongolia.

“the woman who died of plague in the Irkutsk region did not come to Buryatia (Translated from Russian. Original: женщина, погибшая от чумы в Иркутской области, не приезжала в Бурятию)”
Open source (opens in a new tab)People of Baikal on Telegram, October 2, 2026, 13:53 UTC: the head of Buryatia confirmed that the Irkutsk lab technician died of plague (Глава Бурятии подтвердил, что иркутская лаборантка умерла от чумы) · People of BaikalPost 16631 (marked edited), 13:53 UTC
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. Tsydenov states in passing that the woman died of plague, without a stated basis, so we used Condemned, which here records only an attributed assertion of the proposition. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, which fits the wording he posted on Telegram later that day (see the next entry) but not this text, which carries no qualifier. Challenged the characterization does not apply because he accepts the plague description rather than disputing it.

Portrait of Gennady Onishchenko

Gennady Onishchenko

Role at the time: Former head of Rospotrebnadzor and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in remarks to TASS

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

The patient returned from Buryatia, where rodents and fleas are the natural plague reservoir, Gennady Onishchenko told TASS on October 2, 2026.

Quotation excerpt

“The patient returned from Buryatia; the natural plague reservoir there is rodents and fleas. All these natural foci are under our constant control, but all the plague carriers are already asleep (Translated from Russian. Original: Пациентка…”
Read full quotation
“The patient returned from Buryatia; the natural plague reservoir there is rodents and fleas. All these natural foci are under our constant control, but all the plague carriers are already asleep (Translated from Russian. Original: Пациентка вернулась из Бурятии, природным очагом чумы там являются грызуны и блохи. Все эти очаги природные у нас находятся на постоянном контроле, но все носители чумы уже спят)”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)TASS on Telegram, October 2, 2026: Onishchenko quoted on the patient's return from Buryatia; TASS says the infection is most likely not plague (Выявленная в Иркутской области опасная инфекция, скорее всего, не чума)Post 398474 (marked edited), 08:19 UTC
Why we used this label

The reference point is the proposition that the illness of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute employee, reported to have died on October 1 or 2, 2026, was plague. TASS reports that he said the infection is most likely not plague, and his own quoted words tie the season to the carriers being inactive without saying it was not plague, so we used Challenged the characterization. The closest competing label is Denied. It loses because the summary is hedged (most likely) and the direct quotation does not state that it was not plague. Mixed or conditional loses because the clause about confirmation concerns spread of the disease, not the diagnosis.

Massachusetts Attorney General's Office

Role at the time: Office, through spokesperson Molly McGlynn

Condemned

Statement summary

The office criticizes potential technology-driven exploitation of vulnerable gamblers.

“allegations raise serious concerns”
Open source (opens in a new tab)WBUR: DraftKings lawsuit and responsesDaniel Vest filing; statements from Park Winslow, Molly McGlynn and Diana DiZoglio.

What this label refers to

It criticizes alleged exploitation without finding that misconduct occurred.

Portrait of Diana DiZoglio

Diana DiZoglio

Role at the time: Massachusetts state auditor

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

DiZoglio says the allegations are concerning and unacceptable if substantiated.

“if substantiated, completely unacceptable”
Open source (opens in a new tab)WBUR: DraftKings lawsuit and responsesDaniel Vest filing; statements from Park Winslow, Molly McGlynn and Diana DiZoglio.

What this label refers to

Her criticism of alleged targeting expressly depends on substantiation.

Logo of DraftKings

DraftKings

Role at the time: Company, through spokesperson Park Winslow

Denied

Statement summary

DraftKings denies AI targeting based on losses or problem-gambling indicators.

“DraftKings does not use AI to target customers based on losses”
Open source (opens in a new tab)WBUR: DraftKings lawsuit and responsesDaniel Vest filing; statements from Park Winslow, Molly McGlynn and Diana DiZoglio.

What this label refers to

The company denies the alleged conduct rather than justifying it.

Logo of Stop Predatory Gambling

Stop Predatory Gambling

Role at the time: Gambling-policy advocacy organization

Condemned

Statement summary

Stop Predatory Gambling calls DraftKings' model predatory and accuses Massachusetts regulators of downplaying it.

“the Massachusetts Gambling Commission downplayed DraftKings' predatory AI model designed to target addicted gamblers.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Stop Predatory Gambling criticizes Massachusetts regulators' response · Stop Predatory Gambling

What this label refers to

Reference point: DraftKings' alleged use of AI-targeted promotions to exploit vulnerable gamblers. Criticizes both the alleged model and the regulator's response; the model itself remains explicitly condemned.

Portrait of Jason Robins

Jason Robins

Role at the time: DraftKings co-founder and chief executive officer, interviewed at TheGrill

Denied

Response to this claim

DraftKings does not build models to target customers with problem-gambling issues for additional promotions.

“We don’t try to target them and give them more promotions to spend more.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Robins rejects DraftKings AI-targeting allegations at TheGrillSharon Waxman's question asking Robins to identify an inaccurate claim; his answer and subsequent safeguard discussion.
Why we used this label

Robins says the alleged targeting does not occur. That is a denial of conduct, not an argument that targeting vulnerable gamblers would be justified.

Jon Schweppe

Role at the time: Founder of Populist Solutions

Condemned

Statement summary

Jon Schweppe accuses DraftKings of using AI to extract money from problem gamblers and calls for congressional and consumer-protection enforcement.

“find the biggest losers, i.e. the problem gamblers, and take ‘em for all they’ve got.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)DraftKings Is Lying To You About Pretty Much Everything · Jon Schweppe

What this label refers to

Reference point: DraftKings' alleged use of AI-targeted promotions to exploit vulnerable gamblers. Explicit critical interpretation and enforcement argument target the alleged exploitation.

Older statements

People in this topic

Lori Kalani

Lori Kalani is DraftKings' chief responsible gaming officer. A lawyer with a background in consumer protection and state regulation, she previously co-chaired the state attorneys general practice at Cozen O'Connor.

1 case and 1 statement

Paul Liberman

Paul Liberman is a co-founder and executive of DraftKings. He has led the company's product, technology and operations work.

1 case and 1 statement

Mike Rogers

Former FBI special agent and former U.S. representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district.

1 case and 1 statement

Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Matt Bruenig

Matt Bruenig is an American labor lawyer, policy analyst and president of People's Policy Project. He writes about inequality, welfare and economic policy and founded NLRB Edge, a publication covering labor law. He previously worked as a lawyer at the National Labor Relations Board and as a policy analyst at Demos.

1 case and 1 statement

Sara Geoghegan

Sara Geoghegan is senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and director of its Consumer Privacy Program. Her work covers commercial surveillance, data brokers, targeted and programmatic advertising, and health and reproductive privacy. She is a graduate of the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law. She also holds a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and is admitted to the Illinois and District of Columbia bars. In law school, she was editor-in-chief of the UIC Journal of Privacy & Technology Law and a teaching assistant for an appellate advocacy course.

1 case and 1 statement

Dmitry Peskov

Dmitry Peskov is the Press Secretary of the President of Russia and Deputy Chief of the Presidential Executive Office, posts he has held since May 21, 2012. A graduate of Moscow State University's Institute of Asian and African Countries, he worked at the Soviet and Russian foreign ministry and at the embassy in Ankara, joined the president's press service in 2000, and was press secretary to the prime minister from 2008 to 2012.

1 case and 1 statement

Igor Kobzev

Igor Kobzev is a Russian state official who has been governor of Irkutsk Oblast, in Siberia, since December 2019, first as acting governor and, from September 2020, as an elected governor. A former military officer, he served as a deputy minister in Russia's Ministry of Emergency Situations before taking the post.

1 case and 2 statements

Tal Brosh-Nissimov

Tal Brosh-Nissimov is an Israeli physician who specializes in infectious diseases. Israeli media identify him as director of the infectious diseases unit at Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital.

1 case and 1 statement

Alexei Tsydenov

Alexei Tsydenov has been Head of the Republic of Buryatia, a Russian republic in Siberia on the eastern shore of Lake Baikal, since 2017. He was elected in 2017 and re-elected in 2022. Before leading the republic he worked in railway transport and served as a deputy minister of transport of the Russian Federation.

1 case and 2 statements

Gennady Onishchenko

Gennady Onishchenko is a Russian physician and epidemiologist. He served as Russia's Chief State Sanitary Doctor from 1996 to 2013 and headed Rospotrebnadzor from 2004 to 2013. A member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, he was a State Duma deputy from 2016 to 2021.

1 case and 1 statement

Diana DiZoglio

Diana DiZoglio is the Massachusetts state auditor and a former state legislator. Her office audits state agencies, departments and vendors to examine public spending and compliance.

1 case and 1 statement

More people