Case history
Recent changes
Read additions and corrections to published cases, newest first.
Added to the site
Statement from Nabiha Syed
In Should the Supreme Court keep New York Times v. Sullivan's rule and its public-figure extensions?
Syed argues that weakening actual malice would not address much online misinformation and could harm journalists.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from United States Department of Justice
In DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them
DOJ argues that the certification reflects existing nondiscrimination obligations and does not impose new requirements.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence
In DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them
RICADV and the other plaintiffs call OVW's funding conditions unlawful and say they must end.
Statement made
Added to the site
Claim from Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence
In DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them
RICADV argues that OVW's certification and funding restrictions exceed DOJ's authority and unlawfully threaten services and speech.
Claim made
Added to the site
Statement from United States Department of Justice
In Rubio appeals Stanford Daily's protected-speech ruling; FIRE defends it
DOJ argues that the plaintiffs' First Amendment challenge to the two statutes fails.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
In Rubio appeals Stanford Daily's protected-speech ruling; FIRE defends it
FIRE says the ruling affirms that government cannot punish protected speech simply because officials dislike people's views.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from George Porteous
In Rubio appeals Stanford Daily's protected-speech ruling; FIRE defends it
Porteous says reporters should not fear deportation for writing a story and welcomes the court's ruling.
Statement made
Added to the site
Claim from Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
In Rubio appeals Stanford Daily's protected-speech ruling; FIRE defends it
FIRE argues that the government cannot use the challenged statutory provisions against constitutionally protected expression because officials dislike its viewpoint.
Claim made
Added to the site
Statement from Torsten Slok
In Slok says AI has no payoff outside tech; DeLong challenges his measure
Slok says AI has produced no financial payoff outside the technology sector.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Brad DeLong
In Slok says AI has no payoff outside tech; DeLong challenges his measure
DeLong accepts the flat corporate measures but argues that user benefits and new businesses may matter more.
Statement made
Added to the site
Claim from Torsten Slok
In Slok says AI has no payoff outside tech; DeLong challenges his measure
Slok argues that the cited revenue, margin and productivity measures show no financial AI payoff outside tech and that the S&P 493 will determine the payoff.
Claim made
Added to the site
Claim from Brad DeLong
In Slok says AI has no payoff outside tech; DeLong challenges his measure
User benefits and new businesses may be more important AI effects than changes in existing firms' measured profits.
Claim made
Added to the site
Statement from Google LLC
In Google adds an opt-in advertising exception for Gmail and Photos; Whitwam objects
Google defends the policy clarification by pointing to user choice and limits on direct use of inbox and photo-library contents.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Ryan Whitwam
In Google adds an opt-in advertising exception for Gmail and Photos; Whitwam objects
Whitwam warns that sharing more data across Google services increases privacy risk.
Statement made
Added to the site
Claim from Google LLC
In Google adds an opt-in advertising exception for Gmail and Photos; Whitwam objects
Connecting apps is opt-in, and ads will not be based directly on the Gmail inbox or Photos library.
Claim made
Added to the site
Claim from Ryan Whitwam
In Google adds an opt-in advertising exception for Gmail and Photos; Whitwam objects
Whitwam argues that Personal Intelligence can allow summaries and insights from connected content to influence advertising context.
Claim made
Added to the site
Statement from Fontainebleau Florida Hotel, LLC
In Fontainebleau seeks Rabbi Shmuley's AI chats; he challenges the discovery requests
Fontainebleau argues that Boteach's prompts and chats record his mental state and help establish damages.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Shmuley Boteach
In Fontainebleau seeks Rabbi Shmuley's AI chats; he challenges the discovery requests
Boteach asks the court to sustain his objections to the proposed AI-provider subpoenas as drafted.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Shmuley Boteach
In Fontainebleau seeks Rabbi Shmuley's AI chats; he challenges the discovery requests
Boteach calls the targeted discovery order a threat to Americans' AI privacy and frames his objection in constitutional terms.
Statement made
Added to the site
Claim from Fontainebleau Florida Hotel, LLC
In Fontainebleau seeks Rabbi Shmuley's AI chats; he challenges the discovery requests
The requested AI material is relevant to intent to harm and the remaining damages issues.
Claim made
Added to the site
Claim from Shmuley Boteach
In Fontainebleau seeks Rabbi Shmuley's AI chats; he challenges the discovery requests
The AI requests exceed the limited reopening of damages discovery and require protection for qualifying litigation-preparation material.
Claim made
Added to the site
Statement from Columbia Open Discourse Alliance
In Columbia's CODA cancels a press-freedom panel after Sundial's Cornell 7 essay; critics object
CODA says safety and survivors' ability to participate influenced its decision to cancel the panel.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Shoshana Aufzien
In Columbia's CODA cancels a press-freedom panel after Sundial's Cornell 7 essay; critics object
Aufzien criticizes CODA's cancellation of its press-freedom panel.
Statement made
Added to the site
Statement from Clayton Smith
In Columbia's CODA cancels a press-freedom panel after Sundial's Cornell 7 essay; critics object
Smith says CODA's statements betrayed its mission and recommends resignation for board members who supported them.
Statement made