Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Abdul El-Sayed on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Artificial Intelligence, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 23 topics

Statements by Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan, interviewed on NBC's Meet the Press

Denied

Response to this claim

Abdul El-Sayed's family has long been part of the Muslim Brotherhood.

“No. Let me ask you, though, why this is even a subject of debate. Because his only strategy is to point to me and my name and my faith and to say that we're different.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)NBC News: Abdul El-Sayed's full Meet the Press interview, October 11 · NBC News22:05-23:20, question about Rogers's debate attacks and Muslim Brotherhood ties
Why we used this label

Relative to the allegations that El-Sayed and his family have terrorist or Muslim Brotherhood ties, El-Sayed says plainly that neither he nor his family has ties to the group. He adds an attack on Rogers's motive, but his direct answer is a denial.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate candidate from Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

The federal government should set privacy guardrails for Flock cameras.

“Yes, absolutely.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)NewsNation records the federal Flock-camera guardrails exchange0:03-0:25 moderator's federal question and El-Sayed's answer; 1:19-1:39 Rogers's answer
Why we used this label

The fixed proposal is federal privacy guardrails for Flock cameras. El-Sayed answers the moderator's question affirmatively, endorsing that proposal.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Michigan Democratic Senate candidate

Defended or excused

Statement summary

El-Sayed calls the question of which country is the bigger threat ridiculous and says Israel and Iran have each proven dangerous to the United States in different ways.

“I think both of them have proven dangerous in their own way.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)WOOD TV8 video of the October 8 Michigan Senate debate: the Israel or Iran question29:56-32:15 Albin plays El-Sayed's earlier NewsNation answer, asks twice whether Israel or Iran is the bigger threat, and El-Sayed answers (final answer at 32:06)
Why we used this label

Reference point: El-Sayed's refusal to rank Israel and Iran as threats and his comparison of the dangers they pose. Defended or excused: this is that answer, given and explained by El-Sayed, who repeats the comparison when pressed a final time. Explicitly stayed out is the closest competing label, since he called the question ridiculous and would not pick a country, but it loses because he went on to say both had proven dangerous rather than refusing to address the matter.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Condemned

Statement summary

At the October 8 debate, El-Sayed says the tariffs on Canada are costing Michigan residents money and calls them chaotic and self-serving, while backing tariffs used as part of an industrial policy.

“This is, like everything, ham-fisted, chaotic, self-serving, that Donald Trump does.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Michigan Republican faces pressure during heated debate on Trump's Canada tariffsFull article
Why we used this label

The reference point is the U.S. tariff war with Canada. El-Sayed calls it "ham-fisted, chaotic, self-serving" and says it is costing Michigan residents money, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because the tariffs he supports are ones tied to an industrial policy, not the tariffs on Canada.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan, at the first televised debate

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

The organization El-Sayed's mother worked for was indicted for funneling money to al-Qaeda.

“He wants this to be about anything but his own record. He's okay if the federal government spies on you, but he wants to make this about anybody else, going after my mom, my sister.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)WOOD TV8 video of the October 8 Michigan U.S. Senate debate16:02-16:16 Rogers on El-Sayed's donors; 40:44-41:46 watch-list remark, exchange about El-Sayed's mother and El-Sayed's rebuttal
Why we used this label

Relative to the allegations that El-Sayed has terrorist ties, El-Sayed casts Rogers's remark about his mother as a diversion from Rogers's record. He disputes the framing of the attack without addressing the organization or its designation, so challenging the characterization fits better than a denial.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee from Michigan, speaking at a debate

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

El-Sayed insisted that he had condemned the Temple Israel attack.

“I did condemn it”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Michigan Senate debate recapTemple Israel exchange
Why we used this label

He disputes Rogers's description of his response, without making a new apology.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Families would be permitted to retain private health insurance under Abdul El-Sayed's Medicare for All proposal.

“If families want to keep their private health insurance, that’s fine by me”
Open source (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed, Rogers offer insults, answers at US Senate debateHealthcare section and closing statements; original debate aired October 8
Why we used this label

He explains and defends the healthcare proposal at the center of the case.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Condemned

Response to this claim

Rogers supported Trump's tariff war with Canada from the beginning and is changing his position now because his poll numbers are falling.

“You cheerled this tariff war from the beginning and you're flip-flopping now because your poll numbers are in free fall. Donald is the reason we're in a trade war. And he's the reason you're running. Not a serious person.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed campaign statement on Rogers's Canada tariff ad · Abdul El-SayedFull press release
Why we used this label

The reference point is the U.S. tariff war with Canada. El-Sayed blames Trump for the trade war and faults Rogers for having "cheerled" it, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, because he questions whether Rogers's shift is genuine; it loses because he also criticizes the tariff war itself.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Older cases