All topics

Zionism

Public disputes concerning Zionism, its meanings, political advocacy, and its relationship to Israel and Jewish identity.

Published coverage on this page: 3 cases · 20 statements. Statements are ordered newest first.

Topic updates

Follow this topic

Get free email updates about Zionism. We will email you when we add or correct a case in this topic.

Enable JavaScript to request email updates about this topic.

We will send a confirmation email first. Every update email has a link to stop. How we handle your email.

Related cases

Statements

Filter by response label

Labels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.

20 matching statements

Larry Klayman

Role at the time: Founder of Freedom Watch and plaintiff in the civil suit against Piker, writing on the Freedom Watch website

Condemned

Statement summary

In an October 5 Freedom Watch post, Larry Klayman called Piker an antisemitic podcaster, said his lawsuit against Piker had put a target on his back, and said Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian of The Young Turks were next on his list.

“I have already filed suit against anti-Semitic podcaster Hasan Piker, who is Uygur’s nephew. That has put a target on my back, but I am doing this on behalf of our people, which includes you and your loved ones.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Larry Klayman's October 5 Freedom Watch post naming Cenk Uygur and Ana KasparianPost body, second paragraph

What this label refers to

The reference point is Piker's August 20 remarks and the competing readings of them. Klayman again calls Piker antisemitic and presents his suit as action against people he says foment violence, so we labeled it Condemned, consistent with his earlier statements in this case. Mixed or conditional does not fit because nothing in the post qualifies the condemnation. Evidence level: Klayman's own first-person post on the Freedom Watch website; his descriptions of Piker and others are allegations, not court findings.

Portrait of Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political streamer and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

In an Axios interview published September 18, Hasan Piker said Abdul El-Sayed was making a mistake by taking ownership of an insincere characterization while distancing himself from Piker.

“I think he is making a mistake with taking ownership over something that I think most voters understand is insincere.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Hasan Piker reacts to Abdul El-Sayed’s distancing“Driving the news”

What this label refers to

Piker disputes El-Sayed’s characterization and distancing rather than directly defending or condemning the underlying August remarks.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate nominee

Condemned

Statement summary

During a September 15 Michigan Senate debate, Abdul El-Sayed said he had disavowed Hasan Piker’s comments about Jewish Americans and Jewish Michiganders entirely.

“Absolutely… when Hasan made these comments about Jewish Americans and Jewish Michiganders, I disavowed them entirely.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Michigan Senate debate: Abdul El-Sayed on Hasan PikerDebate response about Hasan Piker; broadcast September 15, 2026

What this label refers to

El-Sayed explicitly disavows the remarks at issue, which is a direct rejection within this case.

Portrait of Ms. Rachel

Ms. Rachel

Role at the time: Children’s educator and video creator, writing on her own verified Instagram account

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Ms. Rachel argues against punishing people for supporting Palestine and criticizes Sheeran for yielding to pressure. She urges others to oppose what she describes as genocide in Gaza.

“Ed Sheeran had an opportunity show that we won’t be bullied into punishing people for supporting Palestine.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ms. Rachel criticizes Ed Sheeran over pressure against support for Palestine · Ms. RachelPost DdR1LH3gYBP: text image, opening sentence; accompanying caption

What this label refers to

On Macklemore’s pro-Palestinian MetLife speech, Ms. Rachel supports speaking out for Palestine and rejects punishment for doing so. Her criticism of Sheeran’s response supports that defense; it does not condemn Macklemore’s speech.

Portrait of Philip DeFranco

Philip DeFranco

Role at the time: Host of The Philip DeFranco Show, giving his own commentary.

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Ed Sheeran and his team decided to remove Macklemore from the remaining Loop Tour support dates.

“at the very least, I'm disappointed in Ed”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Philip DeFranco criticizes Ed Sheeran's response to Macklemore's tour removal · Philip DeFranco13:10–13:41; selected quotation at 13:11; separate continuation at 13:53–14:01
Why we used this label

The condemnation targets Sheeran's response and the exclusion of Macklemore, not Macklemore's original speech. DeFranco expressly voices disappointment and criticizes the reported refusal to take sides; his subsequent argument about conflation supports that evaluation. This substantive criticism is stronger than a characterization-only label. Ms. Rachel's embedded statement is not counted as his words.

Portrait of Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political streamer and commentator, in an onstage conversation with Peter Mertens at the ManiFiesta festival in Ostend, Belgium

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

“This is something that even Zionists themselves at times acknowledge, including people who have, in the United States of America, attacked me for saying exactly those words in the past. They themselves have repeated it.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Hasan Piker in conversation with Peter Mertens at ManiFiesta 2026Approximately 16:50 to 19:12 (chapter "Hasan Piker answers the antisemitism accusation")
Why we used this label

The reference point is Piker's August 20 remarks about American Jews and Israel and whether they warned about antisemitic danger or implied a threat. Piker restates the warning reading and disputes the critics' interpretation, so we labeled it Challenged the characterization, as with his earlier responses in this case. Defended or excused is the closest alternative, but he does not argue that any conduct under scrutiny was justified; he rejects the antisemitism charge and restates what he says he meant. Evidence level: the published video of the conversation, checked by ear and against captions; the event details come from the video's description.

Larry Klayman

Role at the time: Plaintiff in the referenced civil lawsuit and author of the Freedom Watch post

Condemned

Statement summary

In a September 11 post, Larry Klayman condemned Hasan Piker and repeated allegations underlying Klayman’s civil lawsuit. The post is a statement of Klayman’s position and does not establish the allegations as fact.

“He is effectively a terrorist who has said that “America deserved 9/11”, and I am suing him for his calls to violence against Jews and Christians who support the State of Israel.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Larry Klayman’s September 11 post on Hasan Piker and the lawsuitLines 54–63; byline/date at lines 54–56

What this label refers to

Klayman uses directly condemnatory language about Piker and frames the lawsuit as a response to alleged calls to violence. The classification describes Klayman’s stated position, while the allegations remain attributed.

Larry Klayman

Role at the time: Civil plaintiff and legal activist speaking personally in a published announcement

Condemned

Statement summary

Larry Klayman condemned Hasan Piker’s August 20 remarks as he announced a Palm Beach County civil lawsuit seeking more than $150 million and an injunction. The complaint’s allegations and requested remedies are not judicial findings.

“Piker yelled fire at Jews and Christians who support Israel.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Larry Klayman announces personal civil suit against Hasan PikerOpening announcement of Palm Beach County case; paragraph beginning Upon filing the complaint; linked complaint

What this label refers to

His own announcement explicitly characterizes the passage as a threat rather than merely a warning. This records Klayman's allegation without treating it as a legal finding.

Astead Herndon

Role at the time: Journalist and host of America, Actually, appearing as a guest on The Majority Report.

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

In a Majority Report discussion of the Democratic response to Piker, Herndon characterized Sen. Jon Ossoff’s statement as responding to something he believed had been taken out of context. He also said candidates should be cautious about responding to every short X news cycle.

“what I think was a thing taken out of context”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)The Real Reason Centrist Dems Are Panicking About 202800:17:49–00:18:04

What this label refers to

Herndon does not defend all of Piker’s statements: earlier in the same discussion, he said Piker was more incendiary than several progressive figures and said he was not defending everything Piker had said. This selected response expressly challenges the framing of the August 20 passage, so challenges the characterization fits more closely than defends or excuses.

Portrait of Richard Painter

Richard Painter

Role at the time: Law professor at the University of Minnesota and former chief White House ethics lawyer, posting on X

Condemned

Response to this claim

Piker’s passage was antisemitic.

“Hasan Piker has crossed the line between criticizing the Israeli government and publicly attacking American Jews who support Israel's right to exist. He is a bigot.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Richard Painter post on Hasan Piker and American Jews · Richard PainterOriginal post body, linking a Forbes explainer on Piker's remarks
Why we used this label

The reference point is Piker's August 20 remarks about American Jews and Israel. Painter says the remarks crossed from criticism of a government into an attack on American Jews and calls Piker a bigot, a direct rejection, so we labeled it Condemned. Challenged the characterization loses because Painter does not dispute anyone's description of the remarks; he adopts the critical reading. Evidence level: his own post, which links a Forbes explainer on the remarks.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

El-Sayed declined to make Piker a subject of the campaign discussion when reporters pressed him about the streamer.

“I am not interested in a conversation about a social media person in California.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed says campaign is not about a Twitch streamerOpening reporter exchange transcribed beneath the video

What this label refers to

In response to reporters’ questions about Piker and a possible condemnation, El-Sayed explicitly declines to make a conversation about Piker the focus.

Portrait of Juan Vargas

Juan Vargas

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for California’s 52nd congressional district

Condemned

Statement summary

Vargas condemned Piker’s comments after the release described them as suggesting that American Jews were inviting violence against themselves.

“I wholeheartedly condemn this statement.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Rep. Juan Vargas statement on Piker comments · Juan VargasFull statement

What this label refers to

Vargas directly says he wholeheartedly condemns the statement described in the official release.

Katy Stoll

Role at the time: Co-host of Some More News’s Even More News podcast

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Stoll said Democratic criticism of Piker’s remarks gave conservatives material and reflected an effort to keep “the real left” out of policy. Earlier in the segment, she said Piker can be crass while arguing that the criticism misrepresented his remarks.

“They want they would rather lose. They would rather give the talking points to the conservatives and and let it lose. They don't want any element of uh the left, the real left involved in the policy.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Democrats Would Rather Criticize Hasan Piker Than Win · Some More News00:03:05–00:04:48; key statement 00:04:22–00:04:48

What this label refers to

Stoll challenges the characterization of Piker’s remarks as antisemitic while expressing a qualified criticism of his phrasing.

Dov Waxman

Role at the time: Israel-studies professor, personal analysis

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Waxman argues that conflating Jews with Israel can fuel antisemitism, but rejects making Jewish safety contingent on severing an attachment to Israel.

“Jews are entitled to have an attachment to Israel.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Dov Waxman distinguishes Jews from Israel while defending attachment to Israel

What this label refers to

He agrees with the need to distinguish Jewish identity from Israel while explicitly separating his position from the safety condition he attributes to Piker.

Portrait of Dana Nessel

Dana Nessel

Role at the time: Michigan attorney general

Condemned

Statement summary

Nessel described Piker as “very anti-Semitic” after discussing his remarks about American Jews and the image of Jeremy Moss displayed during the stream.

“Many of us believe that he is very anti-Semitic”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)The David Frum Show: Dana Nessel and Jewish voters in MichiganClosing exchange after the Piker clip

What this label refers to

Nessel directly describes Piker as “very anti-Semitic” and calls the remarks about a Jewish elected official “really hateful words.”

Portrait of Ken Martin

Ken Martin

Role at the time: Chair of the Democratic National Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Martin said that blaming American Jews for hatred, threats, and violence directed at them is dangerous, wrong, and antisemitic.

“It is dangerous, wrong, and antisemitic.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ken Martin’s X statement on blaming American Jews for violence · Ken MartinPost 2092204175442518019, 6:55 AM EDT

What this label refers to

Martin’s original post directly characterizes the described blame as dangerous, wrong, and antisemitic. Contemporaneous reporting identifies the post as a response to Piker’s remarks.

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for New Jersey’s 5th congressional district

Condemned

Statement summary

Gottheimer characterized Piker’s remarks about American Jews as antisemitic and called for a House vote on a bipartisan resolution.

“Telling millions of followers that Jewish Americans are bringing violence on themselves is blatantly antisemitic and one of the oldest tropes in the book.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Gottheimer calls for House vote on resolution condemning Piker and Owens · Josh GottheimerQuoted statement beginning “Hatred is hatred, period.”

What this label refers to

In an official statement explicitly tied to Piker’s recent remarks about American Jews, Gottheimer calls the description of Jewish Americans “blatantly antisemitic.”

Portrait of Cenk Uygur

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

“he was saying, let’s protect Jewish Americans”
Open source (opens in a new tab)The Young Turks: Den of Vipers — Cenk Uygur reaction00:04:49–00:05:46
Why we used this label

He directly supplies a protective rather than threatening interpretation of the remarks.

Amy Spitalnick

Role at the time: Chief executive of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, posting on her X account

Condemned

Response to this claim

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

“Blaming Jews for the actions of the Israeli government. And then blaming Jews for antisemitic violence that targets them under the guise of protesting Israel. All of it is dangerous & wrong.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Amy Spitalnick post on Hasan Piker's August 20 remarks · Amy SpitalnickOriginal post body
Why we used this label

The reference point is Piker's August 20 remarks about American Jews and Israel, which critics read as an implicit threat and Piker described as a warning. Spitalnick calls them antisemitic, says they blame Jews for violence directed at them, and ends "All of it is dangerous & wrong," so we labeled it Condemned. Challenged the characterization loses because she does not dispute how others described the remarks; she gives her own critical reading. Evidence level: her own post.

Portrait of Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political livestreamer

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

Quotation excerpt

“do not let a coordinated republican smear campaign become “reality.” my argument against the dangerous false conflation between zionism and judaism which in turn increases antisemitism is now turned on it’s head. zionism is not judaism.…”
Read full quotation
“do not let a coordinated republican smear campaign become “reality.” my argument against the dangerous false conflation between zionism and judaism which in turn increases antisemitism is now turned on it’s head. zionism is not judaism. antizionism is not antisemitism.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Hasan Piker reply to Hakeem Jeffries on the August 20 remarksPost text; 5:57 PM ET, Aug. 24, 2026
Why we used this label

In a reply to Jeffries’s characterization, Piker describes it as a coordinated smear and says his argument has been inverted. It disputes the interpretation rather than independently defending or condemning violence.

People in this topic

Larry Klayman

Larry Klayman is an American legal activist, author and commentator who founded Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch USA. His work includes public-interest litigation and political advocacy. He studied political science and French literature at Duke University and earned his law degree at Emory University. He previously worked at the U.S. Department of Justice and ran in the 2004 Republican U.S. Senate primary in Florida.

1 case and 3 statements

Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker, also known as HasanAbi, is a political commentator and livestream host. He broadcasts on Twitch and publishes videos on YouTube, discussing current events and politics. Piker previously made programs for The Young Turks, including Agitprop with Hasan Piker and The Breakdown. He graduated from Rutgers University with degrees in political science and communications.

2 cases and 3 statements

Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

1 case and 2 statements

Ms. Rachel

Children’s educator and video creator.

1 case and 1 statement

Philip DeFranco

Philip DeFranco is an online news host, producer and commentator. He presents The Philip DeFranco Show, which discusses current events and popular culture on YouTube. He also co-hosts Crashing Out with Alex Pearlman. DeFranco also shares news and commentary through his social media accounts.

1 case and 1 statement

Astead Herndon

Astead Herndon is a journalist, editorial director at Vox and host of America, Actually. He previously reported for The New York Times, where he hosted The Run-Up podcast. The National Association of Black Journalists named him its 2025 Journalist of the Year.

1 case and 1 statement

Richard Painter

Richard Painter is an American lawyer and law professor at the University of Minnesota Law School. He was chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush from 2005 to 2007 and writes and comments on government ethics.

1 case and 1 statement

Juan Vargas

Juan Vargas is the U.S. representative for California’s 52nd congressional district.

1 case and 1 statement

Katy Stoll

Katy Stoll is a commentator and co-host of Some More News's Even More News podcast. She also is an actress and producer. Her acting credits include How I Met Your Mother and Bones, and she previously worked at Cracked.

1 case and 1 statement

Dov Waxman

Dov Waxman is a professor of Israel studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and an author on Israel, American Jewry, and antisemitism. He writes academic work and public commentary on Jewish politics and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He earned his undergraduate degree at Oxford University and his MA and PhD in international relations at Johns Hopkins University. He previously taught at Northeastern University and the City University of New York.

1 case and 1 statement

Dana Nessel

Dana Nessel is the attorney general of Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Ken Martin

Ken Martin is chair of the Democratic National Committee.

1 case and 1 statement

More people