All topics

Trade Policy

Public disputes concerning tariffs, trade agreements, market access, and the commercial terms countries set with one another.

Published coverage on this page: 4+ cases · 24+ statements. Statements are ordered newest first.

Topic updates

Follow this topic

Get free email updates about Trade Policy. We will email you when we add or correct a case in this topic.

Enable JavaScript to request email updates about this topic.

We will send a confirmation email first. Every update email has a link to stop. How we handle your email.

Related cases

More cases

Statements

Filter by response label

Labels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.

159 matching statements

Achim Hurrelmann

Role at the time: Co-director of the Centre for European Studies at Carleton University, interviewed by The Canadian Press

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Hurrelmann said an associate-member status for Canada may be hard to negotiate in the short term because the EU moves slowly once its member states are involved. He said there is a case for an upgraded partnership status, possibly under a different label.

“I'm not sure if a status with that name can be established for Canada any time soon”
Open source (opens in a new tab)'Associate' EU membership for Canada not a 'short-term' project: expertPassages quoting Achim Hurrelmann

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Hurrelmann sees a case for an upgraded partnership but doubts the associate-member status can be established soon and suggests a different label may be needed. That is a conditional assessment rather than support or opposition.

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition, posting on X

Condemned

Statement summary

After the Montreal summit closed, Poilievre said it had not reduced a single tariff or won CETA ratification from the nine holdout countries. He said talk of aligning Canada with European taxes, immigration and energy policies would do nothing to lower Canadians' living costs.

“Worse, there was lots of talk at the summit about aligning Canada with the insane European taxes, debt, immigration and anti-oil and gas policies that have left parts of Europe bankrupt and burning.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Pierre Poilievre on X: "In the real world, Canadians can't afford anything."Post text

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre rejects closer alignment with European policies and calls the summit a distraction from living costs. That is opposition to the pursuit, consistent with his October 29 post.

Matthias Lüttenberg

Role at the time: German Ambassador to Canada, speaking to The Hill Times at the Montreal summit

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

After the summit, Germany's ambassador to Canada called its result a major achievement. He said that since von der Leyen and Carney are using the associated-membership term, the two sides should work out what it can mean, and that the label should not distract from the content agreed.

Quotation excerpt

“The president of the commission and the prime minister are using the term associated membership, so let's fill that name with life and see what it can be about. I think we should not be distracted by the label in question from the important…”
Read full quotation
“The president of the commission and the prime minister are using the term associated membership, so let's fill that name with life and see what it can be about. I think we should not be distracted by the label in question from the important content that has been agreed today”
Open source (opens in a new tab)'Entering a new era': Canada, EU pledge closer ties in 'unprecedented' summit as leaders double down on associate membershipPassage quoting Ambassador Lüttenberg

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Lüttenberg backs the deeper partnership and accepts working with the term its leaders use, while leaving its meaning to be defined. That is a conditional position on the proposal rather than clear support or opposition.

Portrait of Ursula von der Leyen

Ursula von der Leyen

Role at the time: President of the European Commission, closing news conference of the EU-Canada summit in Montreal

Defended or excused

Statement summary

At the summit's closing news conference, von der Leyen called associate membership uncharted territory that the EU and Canada can shape together. She said full membership is impossible under the EU treaties.

“The concept of an associate member is uncharted territory, but we have the ambition, trust and creativity to shape it together”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Canada aims to become EU's first 'associate member' by June 2027, Carney saysClosing press conference remarks

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, von der Leyen keeps arguing for the status after the joint statement left the term out. Calling it uncharted territory describes how undefined it is, not a doubt about pursuing it.

Portrait of Mark Carney

Mark Carney

Role at the time: Prime Minister of Canada, closing news conference of the EU-Canada summit in Montreal

Defended or excused

Statement summary

At the summit's closing news conference, Carney said Canada is working toward becoming the EU's first associate member, a status short of accession. He said the two sides would set its substance, scale and scope in the coming months.

“We are working towards the deepest possible partnership short of accession, because of our geography, with Canada becoming the European Union's first associate member”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Canada aims to become EU's first 'associate member' by June 2027, Carney saysClosing press conference remarks

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Carney now uses the associate-member term himself and says Canada is working toward that status. That is support for the proposal, and a step past his October 27 remark that the name did not matter.

Portrait of António Costa

António Costa

Role at the time: President of the European Council, speech to the Montreal Council on Foreign Relations

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Costa says he shares von der Leyen's ambition for Canada whatever the arrangement is called, and says the association will be the closest the EU has.

Quotation excerpt

“President von der Leyen even put forward this bold idea of making Canada an "associate member" of the European Union. I share her ambition. Whether it is this term or another, one thing is clear: our association will be the closest, the…”
Read full quotation
“President von der Leyen even put forward this bold idea of making Canada an "associate member" of the European Union. I share her ambition. Whether it is this term or another, one thing is clear: our association will be the closest, the deepest and the most unique there is. (Translated from French. Original: La présidente von der Leyen a même avancé cette idée audacieuse de faire du Canada un « membre associé » de l’Union européenne. Je partage son ambition. Que ce soit ce terme ou un autre, une chose est claire : notre association sera la plus étroite, la plus profonde et la plus unique qui soit.)”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Discours du président António Costa au Conseil des relations internationales de MontréalClosing passage on the Alliance for the Future

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Costa supports the ambition while leaving the name of the arrangement open. The open question concerns the label, not his support for the closer association.

Portrait of Ursula von der Leyen

Ursula von der Leyen

Role at the time: President of the European Commission, keynote speech at the C.D. Howe Institute

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Von der Leyen says the EU is discussing making Canada its first associate member, a day after member states removed the term from the draft summit statement.

Quotation excerpt

“Of course, Canada cannot become a full-fledged member of the EU because of geography, but we both want to bring our relationship to the highest level possible. This is why we are discussing the idea of Canada becoming the first associate…”
Read full quotation
“Of course, Canada cannot become a full-fledged member of the EU because of geography, but we both want to bring our relationship to the highest level possible. This is why we are discussing the idea of Canada becoming the first associate member of the European Union.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Keynote speech by President von der Leyen on EU-Canada relations at the C.D. Howe Institute · European CommissionPassage on associate membership

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, von der Leyen argues for the idea and says the EU is discussing it. Her remark that Canada cannot become a full member describes the limit of the status, not a condition on her support.

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition, posting on X

Condemned

Statement summary

On the summit's opening day, Poilievre said Carney had spent months on talk of associate membership while Canadians struggle with costs, and that Europe had rejected it. He called the summit theatre and urged Carney to seek CETA ratification, beef access and an end to the EU's planned carbon tariff instead.

“While Canadians can't afford food and homes, Mr. Carney has distracted for months with big talk about "Associate Membership" with Europe. Now, Europe has rejected it.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Pierre Poilievre on X: "How long will this theatre go on?"Post text

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre dismisses the pursuit as a distraction and argues for working within the existing trade deal. That is opposition to the proposal, consistent with his September 20 statement.

BGI Genomics

Role at the time: BGI Genomics, issuing its October 29 corporate statement on the UFLPA listing

Denied

Statement summary

BGI Genomics denies engaging in forced labor.

“We firmly reject all allegations. BGI Genomics has not engaged in any form of forced labour.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)BGI Genomics Statement Regarding Its Inclusion on the UFLPA Entity List · BGI GenomicsNumbered paragraph 1 and closing response

What this label refers to

Relative to the alleged conduct supporting its designation, the company explicitly says it did not engage in forced labor.

MGI Tech

Role at the time: Listed technology company, in a statement signed October 28

Denied

Statement summary

MGI rejects the allegations and plans to challenge the designation.

“We firmly reject the allegations, which we believe are unfounded and inconsistent with the facts.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)MGI Statement Regarding its Inclusion on the UFLPA Entity List · MGI TechOpening position paragraph, final paragraph and October 28 signature date

What this label refers to

Relative to the designation's factual basis, MGI explicitly rejects the allegations as unfounded.

Portrait of Javier Moreno Sánchez

Javier Moreno Sánchez

Role at the time: Member of the European Parliament and chair of its delegation for relations with Canada, interviewed by EUobserver

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In an EUobserver interview the day before the Montreal summit, Moreno Sánchez said he prefers that Canada become an associate member and that it could be a de facto status whatever its legal basis.

“I prefer for Canada to be an associate member, but I don't care about the legal basis; it can be de facto associate membership.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)[Interview] 'I don't care' about the associate membership label row: Lead MEP Javier Moreno Sánchez on upcoming EU-Canada summitAnswer on whether the announcement was a mistake

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Moreno Sánchez says he prefers that outcome and dismisses the legal objections to the label as secondary. That is support for the proposal, as in his September 18 statement.

Matthias Lüttenberg

Role at the time: German Ambassador to Canada, interviewed on CTV News' Power Play

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Germany's ambassador to Canada said the associate-membership announcement surprised some EU governments but did not rule out agreement on it. He called the proposal a gesture of good will toward Canada and said the term was still under discussion.

“I think we have been a little surprised by the announcement, which doesn't mean that we cannot agree on it”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Canada-EU: Aim to solidify 'associate membership' in a yearArticle, paragraphs quoting Carney and Ambassador Luttenberg

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Lüttenberg supports closer ties but says the new concept needs time for all 27 member states to consider, and leaves open whether Germany will accept the label. That is a conditional position on the proposal rather than support or opposition.

Portrait of Mark Carney

Mark Carney

Role at the time: Prime Minister of Canada, speaking to reporters on Parliament Hill

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Two days before the Montreal summit, Carney said the name given to Canada's closer relationship with the EU matters less than what it delivers for Canadians. He described the summit as the start of a year of formal negotiations.

“The good news is it doesn't matter about specific names or nomenclature”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Canada-EU: Aim to solidify 'associate membership' in a yearArticle, paragraphs quoting Carney and Ambassador Luttenberg

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Carney backs pursuing the arrangement and describes the summit as the launch of negotiations on it, while treating the label itself as unimportant. That supports the proposal in substance, as in his September 17 address. The closest competing label is mixed or conditional, because he does not adopt the associate-member name.

Portrait of Alan Wm. Wolff

Alan Wm. Wolff

Role at the time: Former USTR deputy and WTO deputy director-general; PIIE fellow

Condemned

Statement summary

Describing the amicus brief he joined with Carla Hills and Warren Maruyama, Wolff says Section 301 is only for use against individual countries' practices, that no Congress or prior administration treated it as global tariff authority, that it could not confer such authority under the Constitution, and that USTR's forced-labor cases were arbitrary and capricious and not authorized by law. Later in the post he argues that only a constitutional ruling would stop the administration from replacing invalidated tariffs.

Quotation excerpt

“We argue that Section 301 is only for use against individual countries' practices, not a global measure like Section 122. We state that no prior administration and no Congress in its drafting of the provision, or subsequently in is…”
Read full quotation
“We argue that Section 301 is only for use against individual countries' practices, not a global measure like Section 122. We state that no prior administration and no Congress in its drafting of the provision, or subsequently in is amendments of the statute, ever indicated that Section 301 conferred global tariff authority. We argue that Section 301 could not do so under the Constitution and that USTR's forced labor Section 301 cases were arbitrary and capricious, and not authorized by law.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Wolff argues courts need a constitutional limit on broad presidential tariffsSection 301 analysis and account of September 30 argument

What this label refers to

Relative to whether the Section 301 forced-labor tariffs are a lawful remedy or a pretext, Wolff sets out the arguments of the amicus brief he joined: the tariffs exceed Section 301, could not be authorized under the Constitution, and rest on arbitrary and capricious investigations. He also says he expects the president to lose. That rejects the tariffs' lawfulness, so condemns fits.

Portrait of Stéphane Dion

Stéphane Dion

Role at the time: Former Canadian special envoy to the European Union, interviewed on CBC's Rosemary Barton Live

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

On CBC's Rosemary Barton Live, Dion said he doubts the associate-membership label will be accepted in Canada or in Europe. He suggested Canada could instead become an official observer or a full member of the European Political Community.

“I'm not sure that this expression of an associate membership will fly”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Canada needs concrete results from EU summit this week, former envoy saysArticle, section 'A new kind of partnership'

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Dion again disputes the label rather than the closer partnership. He says it sounds to Canadians like a transfer of sovereignty to Brussels and to Europeans like benefits without obligations, and he proposes other forms of association. This matches his September 16 statement, which carries the same label.

Beege Welborn

Role at the time: HotAir commentator writing as Tree Hugging Sister

Condemned

Statement summary

Welborn opposes the proposed relationship and argues that it risks Canadian sovereignty. Her column draws on reporting about the negotiations and criticism of the draft.

“Carney seems to have almost unilateral power to give the country away.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)EU Has the Snare Prepared for the SyrupeansWelborn's own commentary following the Christine Anderson excerpt

What this label refers to

Relative to Canada's proposed association with the EU, Welborn expressly criticizes the project as a threat to sovereignty.

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

Role at the time: Canadian constitutional-rights advocacy organization

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

The Justice Centre questions the implications of the draft for digital rules and Canadian policymaking. It calls for Ottawa to explain the proposal and preserve elected representatives' control over domestic rules.

“ensure Canadians, through their elected representatives, retain control over the rules that govern them.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Justice Centre asks Ottawa to explain the draft EU-Canada partnershipX post 2113354455202811955, 19:39:01 UTC

What this label refers to

Relative to the proposed Canada-EU arrangement, the organization makes its assessment depend on whether Canadians retain control of their rules and whether sovereignty is compromised.

Portrait of Kathleen Van Brempt

Kathleen Van Brempt

Role at the time: Member of the European Parliament, speaking for the S&D group in a plenary debate

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Van Brempt supports deepening the EU's partnership with Canada and says associate membership and the alliance for the future sound promising but must deliver more than a promise.

“That partnership recently has been given a lot of fancy names. You mentioned it: an associate membership, an alliance for the future – it all sounds very promising, but it must be more than just a promise.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Deepening the EU-Canada alliance - preparation of the EU-Canada summit (debate)Speech by Kathleen Van Brempt for the S&D group

What this label refers to

The case asks whether Canada should become an associate member of the EU. Van Brempt backs a closer partnership but conditions her support for the new arrangement on concrete results.

Portrait of Rihards Kols

Rihards Kols

Role at the time: Member of the European Parliament, speaking for the ECR group in a plenary debate

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Kols rejects a new quasi-member status for Canada and calls instead for closer cooperation that delivers on minerals, defence, energy and existing agreements.

“Europe does not need a 28th quasi‑Member State. Europe needs hard industrial depth to break our dependencies on Beijing and Moscow.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Deepening the EU-Canada alliance - preparation of the EU-Canada summit (debate)Speech by Rihards Kols for the ECR group

What this label refers to

The case asks whether Canada should become an associate member of the EU. Kols opposes a new membership label but supports deeper cooperation with Canada, so his position is conditional.

Portrait of Christine Anderson

Christine Anderson

Role at the time: Member of the European Parliament for the AfD, speaking for the ESN group in a plenary debate

Condemned

Statement summary

Anderson tells the European Parliament that Carney should turn down von der Leyen's associate-membership offer, which she says would harm Canada.

“The question is, is Mark Carney stupid enough to fall for it? Or will he do right by the Canadian people and tell Ursula von der Leyen to bugger off?”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Deepening the EU-Canada alliance - preparation of the EU-Canada summit (debate)Speech by Christine Anderson for the ESN group

What this label refers to

The case asks whether Canada should become an associate member of the EU. Anderson opposes the offer and urges Carney to refuse it.

Portrait of Peter Harrell

Peter Harrell

Role at the time: Lawyer and international economic-policy specialist

Condemned

Statement summary

Harrell finds persuasive the arguments that Canada's acts are not discrimination under the statute and that the tariffs do not offset it, and says they would at least significantly narrow the tariffs.

Quotation excerpt

“I have written about Section 338 elsewhere and I find these arguments persuasive: Canada's acts that are the purported basis for the Section 338 tariffs are not "discrimination" within the meaning of the statute, and the tariffs do not…”
Read full quotation
“I have written about Section 338 elsewhere and I find these arguments persuasive: Canada's acts that are the purported basis for the Section 338 tariffs are not "discrimination" within the meaning of the statute, and the tariffs do not "offset" the burden of the discrimination. At the very least, these arguments would mean a significant narrowing of the tariffs.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Peter Harrell finds key arguments against the Section 338 tariffs persuasive · Peter HarrellPost 2112621419301409179

What this label refers to

Relative to imposing the Section 338 tariffs, Harrell finds the arguments against their statutory basis persuasive. His uncertainty about the litigation does not express support for the tariffs.

Thomas Gellert

Role at the time: Co-chief executive officer of Gellert Global Group

Condemned

Statement summary

Gellert criticizes the tariffs for disrupting business relationships and creating costs and uncertainty.

“These tariffs disrupt those relationships overnight and create costs and uncertainty that ripple through the entire supply chain”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Liberty Justice Center announces its Section 338 tariff lawsuitNamed statements in the release

What this label refers to

Relative to imposing the Section 338 tariffs, Gellert criticizes their effect on his company's relationships and supply chain.

Jeffrey M. Schwab

Role at the time: Liberty Justice Center litigation director and counsel for the tariff challenger

Condemned

Statement summary

Schwab criticizes using Section 338 to bypass the procedures Congress provided in Section 301.

“The administration cannot skip those protections by reaching for a 1930 statute that no president had ever used to impose a tariff”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Liberty Justice Center announces its Section 338 tariff lawsuitNamed statements in the release

What this label refers to

Relative to imposing the Section 338 tariffs, Schwab argues that the administration is bypassing the safeguards Congress set in Section 301.

Sara Albrecht

Role at the time: Chairman and CEO of Liberty Justice Center

Condemned

Statement summary

Albrecht argues that presidents cannot use a dormant statute to bypass Congress's limits.

“No president should have the power to pull a dormant statute off the shelf and use it to impose sweeping tariffs or import bans without the limits Congress required”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Liberty Justice Center announces its Section 338 tariff lawsuitNamed statements in the release

What this label refers to

Relative to imposing the Section 338 tariffs, Albrecht argues that the president is using a dormant statute without the limits Congress required.

Older statements

People in this topic

Achim Hurrelmann

Achim Hurrelmann is a professor of political science at Carleton University in Ottawa and co-director of its Centre for European Studies. He studies the politics of the European Union, multilevel governance, the politics of trade and relations between Canada and Europe.

1 case and 1 statement

Pierre Poilievre

Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition in the House of Commons.

1 case and 4 statements

Matthias Lüttenberg

Matthias Lüttenberg is a German diplomat who has shared the ambassadorship to Canada with his spouse, Tjorven Bellmann, since September 2024. He studied law at Passau and Aberystwyth and joined the German Foreign Service in 2003. His overseas assignments included Pristina, London and Tel Aviv. He later worked at the Federal Chancellery on European and Central Asian affairs and became the Foreign Office's director for Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus in 2021.

1 case and 2 statements

Ursula von der Leyen

President of the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, which proposes legislation and negotiates international agreements on the Union's behalf.

1 case and 3 statements

Mark Carney

Prime minister of Canada.

1 case and 4 statements

António Costa

António Costa is the President of the European Council, the EU institution that brings together the bloc's heads of state or government. He chairs its meetings, drives its work forward and represents the EU externally at his level on foreign and security policy.

1 case and 2 statements

Javier Moreno Sánchez

Javier Moreno Sánchez is a Spanish Member of the European Parliament for the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) in the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats group. He chairs the Parliament's Delegation for relations with Canada and sits on its Committee on International Trade.

1 case and 2 statements

Alan Wm. Wolff

Alan Wm. Wolff is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization. Earlier he was U.S. deputy special representative for trade negotiations in the Carter administration and general counsel of the trade office in the Ford administration, and he later chaired the National Foreign Trade Council. He is the author of Revitalizing the World Trading System (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

1 case and 2 statements

Stéphane Dion

Canadian former politician and diplomat, now the first diplomat in residence at the Université de Montréal's Faculty of Arts and Science. He was Canada's ambassador to Germany from 2017 to 2022 and to France and Monaco from 2022 to 2025, and special envoy to the European Union and Europe from 2017 to 2025. He previously served as minister of foreign affairs, minister of the environment and minister of intergovernmental affairs, and led the Liberal Party from 2006 to 2008.

1 case and 2 statements

Beege Welborn

Beege Welborn is a writer for HotAir who also publishes as Tree Hugging Sister. Her commentary covers politics, public policy and current affairs.

1 case and 1 statement

Kathleen Van Brempt

Kathleen Van Brempt is a Belgian politician of the Flemish social democratic party Vooruit and a member of the European Parliament, where she sits with the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group. She was earlier a minister in the Flemish government.

1 case and 1 statement

Rihards Kols

Rihards Kols is a Latvian politician of the National Alliance and a member of the European Parliament, where he sits with the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group. He previously chaired the foreign affairs committee of Latvia's parliament, the Saeima.

1 case and 1 statement

More people