Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Abdul El-Sayed on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Artificial Intelligence, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 23 topics

Statements by Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee, U.S. Senate (Michigan)

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Abdul El-Sayed declined to say whether he would return CAIR-linked campaign donations Mike Rogers had demanded back, defended CAIR as "a civil rights organization," and characterized Rogers's attack as an attempt to make the race about "the color of my skin or how I pray."

“I'm focused on you and your gas prices and the price of your groceries. He's focused on trying to turn this into some kind of culture war.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed pressed on Piker, Israel, socialist ties after Rogers skips Senate debate
Why we used this label

El-Sayed declines to return the CAIR-linked donations Rogers demanded back and defends CAIR as a civil rights organization, characterizing Rogers's funding allegation as a culture-war attack rather than directly engaging its factual premise — challenging the characterization without conceding or fully rebutting the underlying claim.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, Michigan

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

At a Senate debate, Abdul El-Sayed disavowed specific past comments by Hasan Piker about Jewish Americans while defending his continued engagement with Piker generally.

“When Hassan made these comments about Jewish Americans and Jewish Michiganders, I disavowed them entirely.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate debate: Abdul El-Sayed, Mike Rogers takeaways and analysis
Why we used this label

El-Sayed disavows Piker's specific comments about Jewish Americans and Jewish Michiganders while defending his continued general engagement with Piker — combining a specific condemnation with a broader defense, rather than the full, unconditional disavowal he was asked for.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, Michigan

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

Pressed a third time on CBS about condemning Hasan Piker, Abdul El-Sayed declined to answer and redirected to cost-of-living issues.

“Weija, with all due respect, this is the third time you've asked about a Twitch streamer in California... I'm not all that interested in having a conversation about streamers in California because they are not raising the prices of gas and groceries.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Transcript: Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Sept. 13, 2026AI exchange, transcript lines 127–131; video segment linked at transcript lines 146–149.
Why we used this label

Pressed directly on why he has not condemned Piker's rhetoric, El-Sayed redirects to a different topic rather than answering — an explicit decline, not silence.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Michigan Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Abdul El-Sayed calls for a public AI-safety agency, defined no-go uses, public oversight, and a pause in frontier-AI research pending safety assurance.

“We've also been calling for a pause on any of this frontier AI research until we can assure that this is being done safely.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Transcript: Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Sept. 13, 2026AI exchange, transcript lines 127–131; video segment linked at transcript lines 146–149.
Why we used this label

On whether Washington should impose stronger frontier-AI safeguards, El-Sayed directly argues for a public safety agency, public oversight, no-go uses, and a safety-based pause.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, replying from his campaign-linked X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Replying to a Rogers post that urged him to disavow Hasan Piker, El-Sayed criticized Rogers’s record on 9/11 responder health care and asserted that Rogers had opposed it nine times. The entry records El-Sayed’s criticism and asserted count, rather than treating the count as an independent finding.

“You’re right. Sorry. Turns out you didn’t vote to deny 9/11 first responders healthcare twice. You did it NINE times.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed’s reply to Mike Rogers about 9/11 responder health care · Abdul El-SayedX post 2098888435700298207; displayed September 12, 2026 timestamp; reply to Rogers’s embedded post
Why we used this label

El-Sayed directly criticizes Rogers’s conduct and voting record in a reply within the ongoing campaign dispute.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, delivering an anniversary statement published by his campaign

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.

“Nothing can justify the murder of innocent civilians. Nothing.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed’s September 11 campaign statement · Abdul for U.S. SenateCampaign press release dated September 11, 2026; quoted statement in paragraphs beginning “Today, on 9/11” and “They tried to diminish America.”
Why we used this label

This statement provides contrary contextual evidence to the belief attributed to El-Sayed in Claim 113. He expressly rules out justification of the attacks. The classification concerns that attribution; the source does not establish an explicit reply to Rogers or condemnation of Rogers’s campaign conduct.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate, through campaign statement

Condemned

Statement summary

In a campaign release, El-Sayed criticized Rogers for invoking 9/11 in campaign rhetoric while, in El-Sayed’s characterization, opposing health care for people who responded to the attacks. The release linked that criticism to reporting on Rogers’s congressional voting record.

“This is somebody who—when he thinks it’s politically useful for him—wants to invoke the memory of 9/11.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Abdul for U.S. Senate criticizes Mike Rogers’s 9/11 rhetoric and voting record · Abdul for U.S. Senate
Why we used this label

El-Sayed’s statement directly criticizes Rogers’s conduct and political use of the 9/11 attacks. The record attributes the health-care characterization to El-Sayed’s campaign and keeps the vote reporting separate.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Before Rogers’s September 10 funding allegation, El-Sayed said opponents’ recurring attacks were attempts to divide voters rather than address shared problems.

“They’re going to keep trying to divide us because they got no answers around the problems that unite us.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Fact check: No evidence Abdul El-Sayed ‘pledged support’ to Muslim BrotherhoodLines 101–103, 109–110
Why we used this label

El-Sayed challenged the broader characterization behind recurring Muslim Brotherhood-related attacks. He did not address the later campaign-finance allegation in this statement.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Older cases