El-Sayed criticizes Rogers’s use of 9/11 in campaign rhetoric

U.S. Senate candidate, through campaign statement

This is somebody who—when he thinks it’s politically useful for him—wants to invoke the memory of 9/11.

Source and context

Official statement

Abdul for U.S. Senate criticizes Mike Rogers’s 9/11 rhetoric and voting record (opens in a new tab) - Abdul for U.S. Senate

About this source

Campaign release responding to Mike Rogers’s 9/11-focused rhetoric. It attributes the quoted criticism to Abdul El-Sayed and links its health-care-voting argument to contemporaneous reporting. It is a campaign statement, not independent verification of its characterizations.

Reporting

The Guardian reports on Mike Rogers’s 9/11 first-responder votes and campaign response (opens in a new tab)

About this source

The report links congressional vote records for Rogers to arguments over 9/11 first-responder benefits and includes the Rogers campaign’s response. It reports allegations by John Feal separately and should not be used to treat those allegations as established fact.

Before the quotation

Rogers had repeatedly invoked El-Sayed’s association with Hasan Piker and Piker’s 2019 9/11 remarks in the Michigan Senate campaign.

After the quotation

The campaign release followed reporting on Rogers’s votes concerning first-responder and survivor benefits. The release’s criticism does not itself establish the broader allegations it discusses.

Condemned
How this statement is classified

El-Sayed’s statement directly criticizes Rogers’s conduct and political use of the 9/11 attacks. The record attributes the health-care characterization to El-Sayed’s campaign and keeps the vote reporting separate.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Mike Rogers

More from this case

Mike Rogers

Together, they attack America, excuse extremism, and treat our country like the villain.
Read statement
Read the case