Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Abdul El-Sayed on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Artificial Intelligence, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 23 topics

Statements by Abdul El-Sayed

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

“We should stop hurting people.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)The Situation Room transcript — August 5, 2026Segment 03
Why we used this label

Asked whether he regrets the language, he reasserts it, defends discussing everybody's pain, and calls refusal to do so unserious. The response substantively defends his framing.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

“It's unserious when you want to decontextualize violence, and then say you want to stand against violence.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed is courting Jewish voters without moderating his views on IsraelFull report and interview
Why we used this label

In the original interview El-Sayed does more than deny an excuse: he argues understanding causes is necessary for serious prevention and defends his decision to provide that context.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan, interviewed on Fox & Friends

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Appearing at a political event with Hasan Piker does not establish agreement with all of Piker’s statements.

“Of course I don’t think 9/11 was justified.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)El-Sayed rejects justifying 9/11 while defending campaigning with Hasan PikerOpening interview quotations about 9/11 and appearing with someone without agreeing; embedded video 6392681742112
Why we used this label

He combined rejection of the underlying sentiment with a defense of the campaign appearance; neither unconditional endorsement nor complete disavowal describes both parts.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, at a campaign press conference

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

“I also think it’s just critical for us to understand that hurt people do hurt people, and the circumstances happening 6,000 miles away can affect the lives that we live here, and if we stand against violence, we’ve got to stand against violence, all violence.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed, on Temple Israel terrorist: 'Hurt people do hurt people'Second paragraph, quoting El-Sayed at a press conference with Hasan Piker
Why we used this label

The reference point is El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing of the Temple Israel attack. Here he restates the framing and says it is critical to understand, which defends it. We used Defended or excused, consistent with his June and August restatements. Challenged the characterization loses because he does not just dispute that the framing justified the attack; he argues for keeping it. The quote is from Jewish Insider's report.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Candidate for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate, Michigan

Condemned

Statement summary

El-Sayed denounced the war in Iran at a Michigan State University campaign event, said there is no legal authorization for President Trump to continue the conflict, and promised to vote against any funding authorization to continue the war if elected to the Senate.

“I will not sit idly by while our tax dollars go to fund a genocide on behalf of a foreign government.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed courts college kids — and controversy — in Michigan Senate race
Why we used this label

Explicitly condemns the war, denies it has legal authorization, and pledges to vote against its funding.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

“It was a risk.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Abdul El-Sayed calls statement on Temple Israel attack a riskFull report
Why we used this label

On the recorded campaign call he positively justifies publishing his explanation as principled leadership. This is substantive defense of his decision, not merely disputing a label.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Response to this claim

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

“There is never a justification. Hurt people hurt people. Violence is a cycle.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)VIDEO: Abdul El-Sayed Reflects on Temple Israel AttackFull video transcript
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects justification while challenging critics who treat causal explanation as moral excuse.

Portrait of Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Host of America Dissected and former Detroit health director

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

In a 2021 America Dissected podcast, Abdul El-Sayed described the September 11 attackers as driven by hate and said they attacked his country. He also discussed the harms of post-9/11 U.S. actions. The remarks predate Mike Rogers’s 2026 campaign accusation and do not name Rogers.

“The people who carried it out were a group of people driven by hate who attacked my country.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)America Dissected: Abdul El-Sayed on the twentieth anniversary of September 11Published September 7, 2021; transcript lines 34–44 and 71
Why we used this label

The recorded statement directly conflicts with the characterization that El-Sayed endorsed the September 11 attacks, while its broader discussion also criticizes the U.S. response after the attacks. It is classified only as a challenge to that characterization, not as a 2026 response.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Older cases