The Dispute Index

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin says ICE would go to polling places only for a threat or a warrant, and DHS says ICE is not planning operations targeting them but arrests could follow a threat. Three lawsuits allege that position violates federal law.

Claim in dispute

DHS, through Secretary Mullin's September 1, 2026 statements, has adopted a policy authorizing armed ICE officers to go to polling places to serve warrants and conduct other immigration enforcement, and that policy violates 18 U.S.C. 592.

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityU.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementMarkwayne MullinTom HomanLeague of United Latin American CitizensNAACP
2026 Midterm ElectionsVoting RightsElection SecurityImmigration PolicyLaw Enforcement

Overview

The fixed reference point for classification in this case is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places during the 2026 election, as described in three pending federal lawsuits. Responses are recorded against that specific matter: whether federal officials have said or signaled that such agents may be present at polling places, and whether that would be lawful or appropriate. They are not recorded against immigration enforcement generally, claims about noncitizen voting, or the legal merits of any one lawsuit.

On September 1, 2026, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin told reporters in New York that ICE is not there to patrol polling places, and that agents would be at one only if there is a threat to it or they are serving a warrant on someone they have been tracking (C-SPAN video (opens in a new tab)). DHS told Politico (opens in a new tab) the same day that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations, and that arrests could result from targeted enforcement if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 13, White House border czar Tom Homan said on Fox News that there is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens (Fox News video (opens in a new tab)).

Other officials have given differing answers since February. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on February 5 that she could not guarantee an ICE agent would not be around a polling location in November, and that she had not heard the president discuss formal plans (White House video (opens in a new tab)). A DHS election-integrity official told state election officials on February 25 that there would be no ICE presence at polling locations, according to Votebeat (opens in a new tab). Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche asked at a March 26 conference why there is objection to sending ICE officers to polling places (The Hill (opens in a new tab)). In a May 11 letter, the senior official performing the duties of ICE director told Colorado's secretary of state that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places (ICE letter (opens in a new tab)). Asked on May 12 whether he would send the National Guard or ICE to voting locations, President Donald Trump said he would do anything necessary to make sure there are honest elections (PBS News post (opens in a new tab)).

Three suits before Judge Loren AliKhan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenge what they allege is the administration's position. LULAC, Common Cause, Common Cause Education Fund, UnidosUS and the city and county of Denver sued DHS, ICE, Mullin and acting ICE director David Venturella on September 10, alleging a "Polling Place Policy" that violates 18 U.S.C. 592, which bars ordering or keeping "armed men" at places where elections are held unless needed to repel armed enemies of the United States, and the Administrative Procedure Act (No. 1:26-cv-03157; complaint (opens in a new tab)). Nine organizations including the NAACP sued on September 18 under Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidating, threatening or coercing people for voting or attempting to vote, naming DHS, ICE, the Justice Department, the FBI, Mullin, Venturella, Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel and Homan (No. 1:26-cv-03263; complaint (opens in a new tab)). Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the DSCC, the DCCC and the Democratic Governors Association sued on September 23 under both statutes, naming ICE, DHS, Mullin, Venturella, the FBI and Patel (No. 1:26-cv-03330; complaint (opens in a new tab)). These are the plaintiffs' allegations. No court has ruled.

As of September 25, 2026, the CourtListener mirrors of the three dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants. The LULAC docket (opens in a new tab) records that the answer of all federal defendants is due November 10, 2026, 60 days after service on the U.S. Attorney. The September 23 case (opens in a new tab) was assigned to the same judge on September 25. NPR (opens in a new tab) reported that the White House said, in response to the September 18 suit, that the president has not discussed plans for ICE to be at polling places. As of September 25, 2026, we could not locate a public response from the White House, the Justice Department or DHS to the September 23 suit.

People in this case

Timeline

10 timeline entries on this page. Dates: March 9, 2026 to September 25, 2026

  1. March 2026

    1 event

    1. Nine secretaries of state ask DHS to confirm ICE will not be at polling places

      Reaction

      Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold announced a letter from nine secretaries of state to then-nominee Markwayne Mullin asking him to confirm in writing that ICE would not have a presence near voting locations in the 2026 election cycle. The release said the letter followed remarks by DHS official Heather Honey on February 25 and then-Secretary Kristi Noem on March 3.

      [01]Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling Locations

      Source excerpt

      We are calling on the nominated Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin to confirm in writing that there will not be an ICE presence near voting locations in the 2026 election cycle.

      Release announcing a letter from nine secretaries of state to then-nominee Markwayne Mullin. It lists the signatories, quotes Griswold, and quotes remarks by DHS official Heather Honey on Feb. 25 and then-Secretary Kristi Noem on March 3.

      Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling LocationsNews release of March 9, 2026

  2. 63 days between recorded events

    May 2026

    2 events

    1. ICE's acting head replies to the secretaries of state

      Reaction

      Todd M. Lyons, the senior official performing the duties of ICE director, wrote to Griswold that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places and that ICE Homeland Security Investigations would keep investigating voter fraud. Colorado's Secretary of State's office released the letter on May 27 and said it was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries had requested.

      [02]Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026

      Source excerpt

      Therefore, there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places.

      ICE's one-page reply, signed by Todd M. Lyons as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, to the March 9 letter from nine secretaries of state. The copy was published by the Colorado Secretary of State's office.

      Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph
      [03]DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."

      Source excerpt

      I agree that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places.

      Release publishing the May 11 reply from ICE's Todd Lyons. It says the reply was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries requested, quotes Griswold's reaction, and links both letters.

      DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

    2. Witnesses report ICE agents at a San Antonio voting location

      Incident

      According to eyewitnesses cited by the San Antonio Current, ICE agents swarmed a vehicle in the parking lot of a voting location after a Texas Department of Public Safety traffic stop, and the Bexar County sheriff told the agents to leave. Witnesses said they saw no sign that the agents approached or questioned anyone there to vote. The Current said it had not received a response from the sheriff's office, ICE or Texas DPS.

      [04]ICE conducts enforcement action at San Antonio voting location, witnesses say

      Source excerpt

      U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents swarmed a vehicle in the parking lot of a West Side voting location Wednesday morning, according to eyewitnesses.

      Local report based on eyewitness accounts. The Current said it had not received a response from the Bexar County Sheriff's Office, ICE's San Antonio Field Office or Texas DPS. Witnesses said they saw no sign that the agents approached or questioned anyone there to vote.

      ICE conducts enforcement action at San Antonio voting location, witnesses sayReport of the May 20, 2026 incident at the Las Palmas Branch Library voting location

  3. 34 days between recorded events

    June 2026

    1 event

    1. Poll worker says federal officers confronted her inside a Syracuse polling place

      Incident

      A poll worker told the Associated Press that two federal officers visited her at a Syracuse, New York polling place on June 23, during the state's party primaries, to confront her about a social media post. Video she provided shows two uniformed people entering and speaking with her. She said she received an unsigned warning letter from ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility, which she declined to sign. A DHS spokesperson said she had committed a federal crime by posting an ICE officer's address online. The New York State Board of Elections said the incident did not disrupt voting and was not related to the election process.

      [05]Election Worker Says Federal Officers Confronted Her at Polls over Social Media Post Criticizing ICE

      Source excerpt

      did not disrupt voting and was not related to the election process

      Associated Press report. It includes a DHS spokesperson's statement that the poll worker had committed a federal crime by posting an ICE officer's address online, a statement from the New York State Board of Elections, and comments from the poll worker, a colleague and a Brennan Center director.

      Election Worker Says Federal Officers Confronted Her at Polls over Social Media Post Criticizing ICE · Associated PressReport of the June 23, 2026 encounter at a Syracuse, New York polling place, published June 26, 2026

  4. 70 days between recorded events

    September 2026

    6 events

    1. Mullin describes when ICE could be at polling places, and DHS says none are planned

      Claim

      In New York, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant on someone they have been tracking. DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations, and that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. The LULAC plaintiffs later described Mullin's remarks as confirmation of a policy.

      [06]Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video)

      Source excerpt

      The only reason why we would be at polling places if there is a threat to that polling place or we're serving a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down.

      C-SPAN's recording of Secretary Mullin's news conference at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services New York field office about ICE enforcement operations in New York. The polling-place answer responds to a reporter's question that referred to his Senate confirmation testimony. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio.

      Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video) · C-SPANNews conference of Sept. 1, 2026; reporter's question and Mullin's answer on polling places, about 20:28 to 21:50
      [07]Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests

      Source excerpt

      ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations.

      Politico's same-day report on Mullin's New York remarks. It quotes a DHS statement given when Politico asked for more clarity, and says DHS also pointed to Mullin's comments at his March confirmation hearing.

      Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT
      [08]Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1

      Source excerpt

      Markwayne Mullin confirmed and clarified the administration’s policy of authorizing armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to go to polling places

      The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges a "Polling Place Policy" announced by Secretary Mullin on Sept. 1, 2026 and asks the court to declare it unlawful under 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

      Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 11 and 40 to 61, Counts I to III and prayer for relief

    2. LULAC, Common Cause, UnidosUS and Denver sue DHS and ICE

      Claim

      LULAC, Common Cause, UnidosUS and the city and county of Denver sued DHS, ICE, Secretary Mullin and acting ICE director David Venturella in federal court in Washington (No. 1:26-cv-03157). The complaint alleges a "Polling Place Policy" that violates 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act, and asks the court to declare it unlawful and to bar the defendants from carrying weapons near open polling places. The case was assigned to Judge Loren AliKhan.

      [09]League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/10/2026.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 21 were read. ECF 17 records service on the U.S. Attorney on 9/11/2026 and states that the answer of all federal defendants is due 11/10/2026. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction.

      League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 21, Sept. 10 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of appearance for all defendants (ECF 13) and the return of service (ECF 17)
      [08]Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1

      Source excerpt

      Markwayne Mullin confirmed and clarified the administration’s policy of authorizing armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to go to polling places

      The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges a "Polling Place Policy" announced by Secretary Mullin on Sept. 1, 2026 and asks the court to declare it unlawful under 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

      Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 11 and 40 to 61, Counts I to III and prayer for relief
      [10]Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters'

      Source excerpt

      LULAC filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Sept. 10.

      USA Today's report on the LULAC filing. It lists the defendants as DHS, ICE, Secretary Mullin and acting ICE director David Venturella, quotes LULAC's chief executive and Denver's mayor, and quotes a DHS spokesperson.

      Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026

    3. Nine organizations including the NAACP sue under the Voting Rights Act

      Claim

      Nine organizations, including the NAACP, the National Urban League and four national unions, sued DHS, ICE, the Justice Department, the FBI and officials including Mullin, Blanche, Patel and Homan in federal court in Washington (No. 1:26-cv-03263). The complaint alleges that statements and actions about armed federal agents near polling places intimidate voters in violation of Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and asks for a declaration and an injunction. The case was assigned to Judge AliKhan.

      [11]National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      Case Assigned to Judge Loren L. AliKhan.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 4:27 p.m. Entries 1 to 31 were read. They consist of the complaint, disclosure statements, notices of appearance, pro hac vice motions and minute orders granting them. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion by the defendants. The mirror lists ECF 29 to 31 as notices of appearance without descriptions.

      National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 31, Sept. 18 to Sept. 25, 2026, including assignment to Judge AliKhan
      [12]Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1

      Source excerpt

      the federal government has claimed authority to station armed federal agents to unlawfully operate in the vicinity of voting locations.

      The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges that statements and actions by federal officials about armed agents near polling places violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and cites statements by Trump, Mullin, Homan, Blanche, Patel and others. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

      Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 14 and 99 to 113, and Count I
      [13]Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations

      Source excerpt

      Such harms violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation, threats, and coercion of people for voting or attempting to vote, as well as people who encourage or assist others in voting.

      Announcement by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, of the suit by nine organizations. It lists the plaintiffs and their counsel and quotes lawyers and plaintiff leaders, including NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke.

      Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locationsPress release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements
      [14]It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that

      Source excerpt

      is not planning operations targeting polling locations.

      NPR's report on the LULAC and NAACP suits. It quotes a DHS statement to NPR, reports that the White House said in response to the lawsuit that it has repeatedly addressed the issue and that the president has not discussed plans for ICE to be at polling places, and includes remarks from Denver's clerk and recorder and from counsel for the plaintiffs.

      It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026

    4. Court record lists November 10 as the federal defendants' answer date in the LULAC case

      LULAC's lawyers filed proof of service showing that the U.S. Attorney was served on September 11, and the docket entry states that the answer of all federal defendants is due November 10, 2026. A government lawyer had entered an appearance for all defendants on September 12. That date is 60 days after service.

      [09]League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/10/2026.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 21 were read. ECF 17 records service on the U.S. Attorney on 9/11/2026 and states that the answer of all federal defendants is due 11/10/2026. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction.

      League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 21, Sept. 10 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of appearance for all defendants (ECF 13) and the return of service (ECF 17)
      [08]Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1

      Source excerpt

      Markwayne Mullin confirmed and clarified the administration’s policy of authorizing armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to go to polling places

      The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges a "Polling Place Policy" announced by Secretary Mullin on Sept. 1, 2026 and asks the court to declare it unlawful under 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

      Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 11 and 40 to 61, Counts I to III and prayer for relief

    5. Schumer, Jeffries and party committees sue over armed ICE and FBI agents at polling places

      Claim

      Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the DSCC, the DCCC and the Democratic Governors Association sued ICE, acting ICE director David Venturella, DHS, Secretary Mullin, the FBI and FBI Director Kash Patel (No. 1:26-cv-03330). The complaint alleges a "Polling Place Policy" under which armed ICE and FBI agents may be sent to places where ballots are cast and counted, asserts claims under the Administrative Procedure Act, 18 U.S.C. 592 and Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and asks the court to bar armed agents from the vicinity of open polling places, drop boxes and curbside voting locations.

      [15]DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by DCCC, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION, DSCC, HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, CHARLES E. SCHUMER. Case related to Case No. 1:26-CV-3157.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 11 were read. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no response from the defendants.

      DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 11, Sept. 23 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of related case (ECF 2) and assignment to Judge AliKhan on Sept. 25
      [16]Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1

      Source excerpt

      In our democracy, the polling booth is meant to be “an island of calm in which voters can peacefully contemplate their choices.”

      The plaintiffs' complaint. It names ICE, acting ICE director David Venturella, DHS, Secretary Mullin, the FBI and FBI Director Patel, and asserts claims under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Voting Rights Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

      Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, introduction, Counts I and II and prayer for relief
      [17]Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling Places

      Source excerpt

      Federal law explicitly forbids voter intimidation and stationing armed federal agents at polling places.

      DSCC's posting of a joint statement from Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, DSCC Chair Kirsten Gillibrand, DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene and Democratic Governors Association Chair Andy Beshear after the suit was filed.

      Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling PlacesJoint statement posted Sept. 24, 2026 after the Sept. 23 filing

    6. The September 23 suit is assigned to the judge handling the LULAC and NAACP cases

      The court assigned the DSCC case to Judge Loren AliKhan, who is also presiding over the LULAC and NAACP cases. The plaintiffs had filed a notice that the case is related to the LULAC case. As of the docket mirrors' last updates that afternoon, none of the three dockets showed a motion for a preliminary injunction.

      [15]DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by DCCC, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION, DSCC, HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, CHARLES E. SCHUMER. Case related to Case No. 1:26-CV-3157.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 11 were read. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no response from the defendants.

      DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 11, Sept. 23 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of related case (ECF 2) and assignment to Judge AliKhan on Sept. 25
      [09]League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/10/2026.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 21 were read. ECF 17 records service on the U.S. Attorney on 9/11/2026 and states that the answer of all federal defendants is due 11/10/2026. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction.

      League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 21, Sept. 10 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of appearance for all defendants (ECF 13) and the return of service (ECF 17)
      [11]National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket

      Source excerpt

      Case Assigned to Judge Loren L. AliKhan.

      Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 4:27 p.m. Entries 1 to 31 were read. They consist of the complaint, disclosure statements, notices of appearance, pro hac vice motions and minute orders granting them. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion by the defendants. The mirror lists ECF 29 to 31 as notices of appearance without descriptions.

      National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 31, Sept. 18 to Sept. 25, 2026, including assignment to Judge AliKhan

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

DHS, through Secretary Mullin's September 1, 2026 statements, has adopted a policy authorizing armed ICE officers to go to polling places to serve warrants and conduct other immigration enforcement, and that policy violates 18 U.S.C. 592.

League of United Latin American Citizens

Sources (2)

Disputed claim

Federal officials' statements and actions about deploying ICE and other armed federal agents near polling places intimidate voters and violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act.

NAACP

Sources (2)

Disputed claim

ICE officers would be at polling places only if there is a threat to the polling place or they are serving a warrant on someone ICE has been actively tracking down.

Markwayne Mullin

Sources (2)

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 14. Dates: February 3, 2026 to September 24, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

14 responses on this page

  1. Chuck Schumer
    "We are taking strong, joint legal action to block Donald Trump’s threats to deploy federal agents, including ICE and FBI agents, to polling places this November. … Federal law explicitly forbids voter intimidation and stationing armed federal agents at polling places."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling PlacesJoint statement posted Sept. 24, 2026 after the Sept. 23 filing
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, introduction, Counts I and II and prayer for relief
    Condemned

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    In a joint statement after filing suit, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the chairs of the DSCC, DCCC and Democratic Governors Association said they are taking legal action to block what they called Donald Trump's threats to deploy federal agents, including ICE and FBI agents, to polling places, and said "Federal law explicitly forbids voter intimidation and stationing armed federal agents at polling places".

    Role at the time: Senate Democratic Leader, in a joint statement with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the DSCC, DCCC and Democratic Governors Association chairs

    Before the statement

    Schumer, Jeffries, the DSCC, the DCCC and the Democratic Governors Association filed suit in federal court in Washington on September 23.

    After the statement

    The complaint names ICE, DHS, Secretary Mullin, acting ICE director David Venturella, the FBI and FBI Director Kash Patel.

    Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling PlacesJoint statement posted Sept. 24, 2026 after the Sept. 23 filing
    Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, introduction, Counts I and II and prayer for relief

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. The statement announced legal action to block threatened deployments and said federal law forbids stationing armed federal agents at polling places, which expressly rejects the practice. It set no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  2. NAACPDirectly involved
    "We reject this administration’s attempt to desecrate our polling sites by converting them into militarized zones through the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent … The Voting Rights Act prohibits intimidation tactics that stand to deny and deter voters from exercising their voice and their rights."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locationsPress release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 14 and 99 to 113, and Count I
    Condemned

    Responding to: Federal officials' statements and actions about deploying ICE and other armed federal agents near polling places intimidate voters and violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act.

    Read more

    In the plaintiffs' September 18 announcement, NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke said the NAACP rejects an attempt to convert polling sites into "militarized zones through the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent", and said the Voting Rights Act "prohibits intimidation tactics that stand to deny and deter voters from exercising their voice and their rights".

    Role at the time: NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke, speaking for a lead plaintiff

    Before the statement

    Nine organizations including the NAACP sued in federal court in Washington under Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act.

    After the statement

    The announcement, issued by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, also quoted lawyers for the plaintiffs and the leaders of other plaintiff organizations.

    Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locationsPress release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements
    Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1 · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 14 and 99 to 113, and Count I

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Clarke described the deployment of ICE or other federal agents to polling sites as unlawful and said the NAACP rejects it, which expressly condemns the practice. She set no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  3. Tom HomanDirectly involved
    "I have not seen any operational plans or any discussions on any immigration enforcement operation at polling places. This is another fear tactic. This is another attack on ICE and this administration. … I want to put that to bed. There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens."
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Tom Homan Reacts to Denver Lawsuit Seeking to Block ICE at Polls (Fox News video) · Fox NewsFox News Sunday Briefing, Sept. 13, 2026; answer on polling places, about 1:05 to 1:30 and 1:55 to 2:15 of the clip
    Open source (opens in a new tab)ICE has no plans to 'sweep polling locations' for noncitizens, Homan says · The HillReport of Homan's Fox News Sunday Briefing remarks, published Sept. 14, 2026 at 11:07 a.m. ET
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Will the Trump administration send federal officers or troops to the polls? Here's what we know · CNNSections on Mullin, Patel, Caine, Homan and Trump; published Sept. 7 and updated Sept. 15, 2026
    Denied

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    On Fox News, Homan said he had not seen operational plans or discussions of immigration enforcement operations at polling places, called the claims "another fear tactic", and said, "There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens".

    Role at the time: White House border czar

    Before the statement

    Fox News host Jacqui Heinrich asked Homan whether there was any truth to claims that ICE would be raiding polling locations, three days after Denver and civil rights groups sued to block ICE from polling places.

    After the statement

    In the same interview, The Hill reported, Homan was asked whether there has been an order for enforcement to stay away from polling places and said there is no sensitive-location policy.

    Tom Homan Reacts to Denver Lawsuit Seeking to Block ICE at Polls (Fox News video) · Fox NewsFox News Sunday Briefing, Sept. 13, 2026; answer on polling places, about 1:05 to 1:30 and 1:55 to 2:15 of the clip
    ICE has no plans to 'sweep polling locations' for noncitizens, Homan says · The HillReport of Homan's Fox News Sunday Briefing remarks, published Sept. 14, 2026 at 11:07 a.m. ET
    Will the Trump administration send federal officers or troops to the polls? Here's what we know · CNNSections on Mullin, Patel, Caine, Homan and Trump; published Sept. 7 and updated Sept. 15, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Homan said he had seen no plans and that there is no plan to sweep polling places, which denies the alleged plan. Challenges the characterization loses because he denied the plan itself and did not merely dispute how critics describe it.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  4. League of United Latin American CitizensDirectly involved
    "The question before the court is not about immigration. It is whether the federal government may post armed officers between a citizen and the voting booth. Congress answered that question in 1865, and the answer was no. Our vote is our voice, and LULAC will not stand by while any administration, of any party, tests whether that voice can be quieted."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)LULAC Sues Department of Homeland Security To Keep Armed ICE Officers Out Of America's Polling Places · League of United Latin American CitizensPress release of Sept. 10, 2026
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026
    Condemned

    Responding to: DHS, through Secretary Mullin's September 1, 2026 statements, has adopted a policy authorizing armed ICE officers to go to polling places to serve warrants and conduct other immigration enforcement, and that policy violates 18 U.S.C. 592.

    Read more

    In LULAC's announcement of its lawsuit, national president Roman Palomares said the case asks "whether the federal government may post armed officers between a citizen and the voting booth", and said "Congress answered that question in 1865, and the answer was no".

    Role at the time: LULAC national president and chairman of the board, speaking for a lead plaintiff

    Before the statement

    LULAC filed suit in federal court in Washington against DHS, ICE, Secretary Mullin and acting ICE director David Venturella.

    After the statement

    Common Cause, UnidosUS and the city and county of Denver joined LULAC as co-plaintiffs.

    LULAC Sues Department of Homeland Security To Keep Armed ICE Officers Out Of America's Polling Places · League of United Latin American CitizensPress release of Sept. 10, 2026
    Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Palomares argued that Congress barred armed federal officers between a citizen and the voting booth and vowed that LULAC will not stand by, which expressly rejects the practice. He set no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  5. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDirectly involved
    "ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations. ICE conducts intelligence-driven targeted enforcement, and if an active public safety threat endangered a polling location, they may be arrested as a result of that targeted enforcement action."
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026
    Open source (opens in a new tab)It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026
    Mixed or conditional

    Responding to: ICE officers would be at polling places only if there is a threat to the polling place or they are serving a warrant on someone ICE has been actively tracking down.

    Read more

    In a statement to Politico, DHS said ICE "is not planning operations targeting polling locations", and added that if an active public safety threat endangered a polling location, arrests could result from targeted enforcement.

    Role at the time: Department statement given to Politico

    Before the statement

    Politico asked DHS for more clarity on Mullin's remarks about ICE at polling places.

    After the statement

    DHS gave a similar statement to USA Today on September 10 and to NPR on September 18.

    Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT
    Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026
    It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. DHS said ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations, and also said arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. That pairs a denial of a planned presence with an express condition under which enforcement could occur, the same position as Mullin's. The closest alternative, denies, loses because the second sentence reserves enforcement at a polling location.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  6. Markwayne MullinDirectly involved
    "I was being very, very clear when I said ICE isn't there to patrol the polling places. We're there to enforce specific threats. The only reason why we would be at polling places if there is a threat to that polling place or we're serving a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down. … If we're serving a warrant, we will be where we need to be."
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video) · C-SPANNews conference of Sept. 1, 2026; reporter's question and Mullin's answer on polling places, about 20:28 to 21:50
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT
    Mixed or conditional

    Responding to: ICE officers would be at polling places only if there is a threat to the polling place or they are serving a warrant on someone ICE has been actively tracking down.

    Read more

    Asked at a New York news conference about his Senate confirmation testimony, Mullin said ICE is not there to patrol polling places and would be at one only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant on someone they have been actively tracking. He said, "If we're serving a warrant, we will be where we need to be".

    Role at the time: Secretary of Homeland Security

    Before the statement

    A reporter at a news conference on immigration enforcement operations in New York asked about Mullin's Senate confirmation testimony that ICE could be sent to polling places only in the event of a specific threat.

    After the statement

    DHS gave Politico a statement the same day saying ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations.

    Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video) · C-SPANNews conference of Sept. 1, 2026; reporter's question and Mullin's answer on polling places, about 20:28 to 21:50
    Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Mullin said ICE would not patrol polling places but would be at one for a threat or to serve a warrant, so his position depends on express conditions. Defends or excuses loses because he did not argue for agents at polling places generally, and denies loses because he did not rule out a presence.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
View all 14 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. Bobby Charles
    "I’m going to make an appeal for ICE and marshals to be at our voting booths"
    Open source (opens in a new tab)GOP nominee for Maine governor calls for ICE agents at state polling places · Associated PressAssociated Press report of audio from an Aug. 20 event in Arundel, Maine, published Aug. 26, 2026
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    Maine's Republican nominee for governor, Bobby Charles, told supporters at an August 20 event that he would ask White House border czar Tom Homan to send federal agents to polling places. According to audio obtained by the Associated Press, he said, "I'm going to make an appeal for ICE and marshals to be at our voting booths".

    Role at the time: Republican nominee for governor of Maine

    Before the statement

    Charles was speaking to a Maine Young Republicans chapter at an event in Arundel.

    After the statement

    On August 26, Charles said state and local authorities should have an open line of communication with federal authorities to prevent violence, intimidation and illegality at a voting place, according to the Associated Press.

    GOP nominee for Maine governor calls for ICE agents at state polling places · Associated PressAssociated Press report of audio from an Aug. 20 event in Arundel, Maine, published Aug. 26, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Charles called for ICE and U.S. marshals to be at voting booths, which argues for deploying federal agents at polling places. He holds no federal office, so this is recorded as a candidate's position rather than an administration position.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  2. Donald Trump
    "I'd do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections. We have to have honest elections."
    Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Post by PBS News (@NewsHour) on X, May 12, 2026: Trump on federal agents at polling placesComplete post 2054282657228279891 with video clip, 19:28 UTC on May 12, 2026
    Mixed or conditional

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    Asked by a PBS News reporter whether he would send the National Guard or ICE to voting locations in November, Trump said, "I'd do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections".

    Role at the time: President of the United States

    Before the statement

    PBS News reporter Liz Landers asked Trump on Tuesday, May 12, about the possibility of federal agents at polling places during the November midterm elections.

    After the statement

    PBS News noted that DHS had told state officials earlier in the year that ICE agents would not be present at voting locations during the midterm elections. A reporter then asked whether he was not ruling that out, and his brief reply is hard to make out on the recording.

    Post by PBS News (@NewsHour) on X, May 12, 2026: Trump on federal agents at polling placesComplete post 2054282657228279891 with video clip, 19:28 UTC on May 12, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Trump neither said agents would nor would not be sent to voting locations, and tied any action to doing "anything necessary" for honest elections. That express, unresolved condition fits mixed or conditional. Explicitly declines loses because he answered in general terms instead of refusing the question.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  3. Todd Lyons
    "Therefore, there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places. ICE officers and special agents are sworn federal law enforcement officials that are responsible for enforcing violations of immigration and criminal laws. However, as the principal investigative component of DHS, ICE Homeland Security Investigations plays an important role in investigating voter fraud and will continue to perform this vital mission."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement
    Denied

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    In a May 11 letter to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, Todd M. Lyons wrote that "there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places" and added that ICE Homeland Security Investigations "will continue to perform this vital mission" of investigating voter fraud.

    Role at the time: Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    Before the statement

    The March 9 letter from nine secretaries of state had asked for confirmation that ICE officers and special agents will not be present at voting and election administration locations during the 2026 election.

    After the statement

    The Colorado Secretary of State's office released the letter on May 27 and said it was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries had requested.

    Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph
    DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Lyons answered a request for confirmation that ICE would not be present by writing that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places, which rejects the premise of a planned presence. Mixed or conditional loses because the added sentence concerns voter-fraud investigations, not a polling-place deployment.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  4. Todd Blanche
    "Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places? Illegals can't vote. It doesn't make any sense."
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)WATCH: Deputy AG Todd Blanche Calls To Deploy ICE Agents To Polling Sites (Forbes Breaking News video) · ForbesCPAC 2026 conversation in Grapevine, Texas, March 26, 2026; about 1:40 to 1:55 of the clip
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Blanche: 'Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?' · The HillReport of Blanche's CPAC remarks, published March 27, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    At the Conservative Political Action Conference in Texas, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche asked why there is objection to sending ICE officers to polling places and said, "Illegals can't vote. It doesn't make any sense".

    Role at the time: Deputy Attorney General

    Before the statement

    Blanche was speaking in an on-stage conversation at CPAC, and the discussion had turned to election integrity.

    After the statement

    The Hill reported the remark on March 27, noting that DHS officials had given conflicting answers over whether ICE officers might be stationed at polling places.

    WATCH: Deputy AG Todd Blanche Calls To Deploy ICE Agents To Polling Sites (Forbes Breaking News video) · ForbesCPAC 2026 conversation in Grapevine, Texas, March 26, 2026; about 1:40 to 1:55 of the clip
    Blanche: 'Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?' · The HillReport of Blanche's CPAC remarks, published March 27, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Blanche's rhetorical question argued that objections to sending ICE officers to polling places have no basis, which defends the idea. He described no conditions, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  5. Jena Griswold
    "Trump and his administration have used ICE to terrorize and intimidate Americans. Immigration officials must not be used to intimidate voters … We are calling on the nominated Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin to confirm in writing that there will not be an ICE presence near voting locations in the 2026 election cycle."
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling LocationsNews release of March 9, 2026
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement
    Condemned

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    In a news release announcing a letter from nine secretaries of state, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said, "Immigration officials must not be used to intimidate voters", and asked nominee Markwayne Mullin to "confirm in writing that there will not be an ICE presence near voting locations in the 2026 election cycle".

    Role at the time: Colorado Secretary of State

    Before the statement

    Eight other secretaries of state signed the letter to then-nominee Markwayne Mullin. The release said it followed comments by former Secretary Kristi Noem and DHS staff.

    After the statement

    On May 27, Griswold said she agreed there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places but remained concerned that agency leadership cannot provide an unequivocal answer.

    Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling LocationsNews release of March 9, 2026
    DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Griswold said immigration officials must not be used to intimidate voters and asked for written confirmation of no ICE presence near voting locations, which expressly rejects the practice. She set no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  6. Heather Honey
    "Any suggestion that ICE is going to be present at polling places is simply disinformation … There will be no ICE presence at polling locations for this election."
    Open source (opens in a new tab)ICE won't be at polling places in 2026 election, Trump administration official says · VotebeatReport of Honey's remarks in a Feb. 25 virtual meeting with state election officials, published Feb. 26, 2026
    Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling LocationsNews release of March 9, 2026
    Denied

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    In a virtual meeting with state election officials, DHS deputy assistant secretary Heather Honey answered a question from California Secretary of State Shirley Weber by calling any suggestion that ICE will be at polling places "simply disinformation" and saying, "There will be no ICE presence at polling locations for this election". Votebeat reported the remarks from five people who listened to the call.

    Role at the time: Deputy Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Election Integrity

    Before the statement

    The virtual meeting between federal agencies and state election officials was organized by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

    After the statement

    Colorado's Secretary of State quoted Honey in a March 9 news release, in a slightly shorter form, and DHS did not immediately respond to Votebeat's request for comment.

    ICE won't be at polling places in 2026 election, Trump administration official says · VotebeatReport of Honey's remarks in a Feb. 25 virtual meeting with state election officials, published Feb. 26, 2026
    Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling LocationsNews release of March 9, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Honey said that any suggestion of an ICE presence at polling places is disinformation and that there will be none, which denies the alleged plan. She attached no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  7. Karoline Leavitt
    "That's not something I've ever heard the president consider, no. … I can't guarantee that an ICE agent won't be around a polling location in November. I mean, that's frankly a very silly hypothetical question. But what I can tell you is I haven't heard the president discuss any formal plans to put ICE outside of polling locations. It's a disingenuous question."
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026 · The White HouseQuestions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08
    Open source (opens in a new tab)It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026
    Mixed or conditional

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    Asked at a White House briefing whether a comment by Steve Bannon that ICE would be around the polls was something the president was considering, Leavitt said, "That's not something I've ever heard the president consider, no". Asked whether she could guarantee ICE would not be around polling locations, she said she could not, and that she had not heard the president discuss any formal plans.

    Role at the time: White House press secretary

    Before the statement

    A reporter quoted Steve Bannon's February 3 comment as saying ICE would be around the polls in November and asked whether the president was considering it.

    After the statement

    On September 18, NPR reported that the White House said, in response to the NAACP lawsuit, that the president has not discussed plans for ICE to be at polling places.

    Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026 · The White HouseQuestions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08
    It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Leavitt denied hearing of any formal plan but refused to guarantee that an ICE agent would not be around a polling location. Those two positions together fit mixed or conditional better than a denial or a refusal to address the question.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement
  8. Steve Bannon
    "you're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November. We're not gonna sit here and allow you to steal the country again."
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Steve Bannon: 'You're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November' · Media Matters for AmericaWar Room broadcast of Feb. 3, 2026, opening segment
    Open source (opens in a new tab)Steve Bannon calls for immigration agents at polling sites during midterms · The GuardianReport of Bannon's Feb. 3 War Room remarks, published Feb. 4, 2026
    Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026 · The White HouseQuestions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

    Read more

    On his War Room show, Steve Bannon said, "you're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November" and "We're not gonna sit here and allow you to steal the country again".

    Role at the time: Host of the War Room podcast and former White House strategist

    Before the statement

    Bannon had just said Democrats were calling this the greatest voter suppression movement in history.

    After the statement

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked about the remark at a briefing two days later.

    Steve Bannon: 'You're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November' · Media Matters for AmericaWar Room broadcast of Feb. 3, 2026, opening segment
    Steve Bannon calls for immigration agents at polling sites during midterms · The GuardianReport of Bannon's Feb. 3 War Room remarks, published Feb. 4, 2026
    Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026 · The White HouseQuestions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08

    Why this label?

    The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Bannon said ICE would surround the polls and tied it to preventing an alleged stolen election, which argues for the practice. He holds no government role, so this is recorded as commentary rather than an administration position.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

    Read statementLink to this statement

Sources

(29)

Original video

Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video)

Homeland Security Secretary Mullin on ICE Enforcement Operations in New York (C-SPAN video) (opens in a new tab) · C-SPANNews conference of Sept. 1, 2026; reporter's question and Mullin's answer on polling places, about 20:28 to 21:50
Watch original video (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: News conference of Sept. 1, 2026; reporter's question and Mullin's answer on polling places, about 20:28 to 21:50

Excerpt

"The only reason why we would be at polling places if there is a threat to that polling place or we're serving a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down."

About this source

C-SPAN's recording of Secretary Mullin's news conference at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services New York field office about ICE enforcement operations in New York. The polling-place answer responds to a reporter's question that referred to his Senate confirmation testimony. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio.

Author
Markwayne Mullin
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Election Worker Says Federal Officers Confronted Her at Polls over Social Media Post Criticizing ICE

Election Worker Says Federal Officers Confronted Her at Polls over Social Media Post Criticizing ICE (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressReport of the June 23, 2026 encounter at a Syracuse, New York polling place, published June 26, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of the June 23, 2026 encounter at a Syracuse, New York polling place, published June 26, 2026

Excerpt

"did not disrupt voting and was not related to the election process"

About this source

Associated Press report. It includes a DHS spokesperson's statement that the poll worker had committed a federal crime by posting an ICE officer's address online, a statement from the New York State Board of Elections, and comments from the poll worker, a colleague and a Brennan Center director.

Author
Patrick Whittle
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

ICE conducts enforcement action at San Antonio voting location, witnesses say

ICE conducts enforcement action at San Antonio voting location, witnesses say (opens in a new tab)Report of the May 20, 2026 incident at the Las Palmas Branch Library voting location
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of the May 20, 2026 incident at the Las Palmas Branch Library voting location

Excerpt

"U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents swarmed a vehicle in the parking lot of a West Side voting location Wednesday morning, according to eyewitnesses."

About this source

Local report based on eyewitness accounts. The Current said it had not received a response from the Bexar County Sheriff's Office, ICE's San Antonio Field Office or Texas DPS. Witnesses said they saw no sign that the agents approached or questioned anyone there to vote.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1

Complaint, DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 23, 2026), ECF 1 (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, introduction, Counts I and II and prayer for relief
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: ECF 1, introduction, Counts I and II and prayer for relief

Excerpt

"In our democracy, the polling booth is meant to be “an island of calm in which voters can peacefully contemplate their choices.”"

About this source

The plaintiffs' complaint. It names ICE, acting ICE director David Venturella, DHS, Secretary Mullin, the FBI and FBI Director Patel, and asserts claims under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Voting Rights Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

Published
Accessed

Original text

Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1

Complaint, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 18, 2026), ECF 1 (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 14 and 99 to 113, and Count I
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: ECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 14 and 99 to 113, and Count I

Excerpt

"the federal government has claimed authority to station armed federal agents to unlawfully operate in the vicinity of voting locations."

About this source

The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges that statements and actions by federal officials about armed agents near polling places violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and cites statements by Trump, Mullin, Homan, Blanche, Patel and others. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1

Complaint, League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 10, 2026), ECF 1 (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 11 and 40 to 61, Counts I to III and prayer for relief
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: ECF 1, paragraphs 1 to 11 and 40 to 61, Counts I to III and prayer for relief

Excerpt

"Markwayne Mullin confirmed and clarified the administration’s policy of authorizing armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to go to polling places"

About this source

The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges a "Polling Place Policy" announced by Secretary Mullin on Sept. 1, 2026 and asks the court to declare it unlawful under 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket

DSCC v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, No. 1:26-cv-03330 (D.D.C.): docket (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 11, Sept. 23 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of related case (ECF 2) and assignment to Judge AliKhan on Sept. 25
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Docket entries 1 to 11, Sept. 23 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of related case (ECF 2) and assignment to Judge AliKhan on Sept. 25

Excerpt

"NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by DCCC, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION, DSCC, HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, CHARLES E. SCHUMER. Case related to Case No. 1:26-CV-3157."

About this source

Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 11 were read. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no response from the defendants.

Published
Accessed

Original text

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03263 (D.D.C.): docket (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 31, Sept. 18 to Sept. 25, 2026, including assignment to Judge AliKhan
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Docket entries 1 to 31, Sept. 18 to Sept. 25, 2026, including assignment to Judge AliKhan

Excerpt

"Case Assigned to Judge Loren L. AliKhan."

About this source

Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 4:27 p.m. Entries 1 to 31 were read. They consist of the complaint, disclosure statements, notices of appearance, pro hac vice motions and minute orders granting them. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion by the defendants. The mirror lists ECF 29 to 31 as notices of appearance without descriptions.

Published
Accessed

Original text

League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket

League of United Latin American Citizens v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, No. 1:26-cv-03157 (D.D.C.): docket (opens in a new tab) · United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaDocket entries 1 to 21, Sept. 10 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of appearance for all defendants (ECF 13) and the return of service (ECF 17)
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Docket entries 1 to 21, Sept. 10 to Sept. 25, 2026, including the notice of appearance for all defendants (ECF 13) and the return of service (ECF 17)

Excerpt

"Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/10/2026."

About this source

Court docket as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP), last updated Sept. 25, 2026 at 5:14 p.m. Entries 1 to 21 were read. ECF 17 records service on the U.S. Attorney on 9/11/2026 and states that the answer of all federal defendants is due 11/10/2026. The docket shows no motion for a preliminary injunction.

Published
Accessed

Reporting

GOP nominee for Maine governor calls for ICE agents at state polling places

GOP nominee for Maine governor calls for ICE agents at state polling places (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressAssociated Press report of audio from an Aug. 20 event in Arundel, Maine, published Aug. 26, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Associated Press report of audio from an Aug. 20 event in Arundel, Maine, published Aug. 26, 2026

Excerpt

"I’m going to make an appeal for ICE and marshals to be at our voting booths"

About this source

Associated Press report, carried by NBC News, based on audio it obtained of an Aug. 20 event with a Maine Young Republicans chapter. The Bangor Daily News first reported the audio. The report includes Charles's Aug. 26 explanation and a DHS statement.

Author
The Associated Press
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling Places

Leaders Schumer and Jeffries, DSCC, DCCC, and DGA File New Lawsuit to Block Trump and Republicans' Threats to Intimidate Voters at Polling Places (opens in a new tab)Joint statement posted Sept. 24, 2026 after the Sept. 23 filing
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Joint statement posted Sept. 24, 2026 after the Sept. 23 filing

Excerpt

"Federal law explicitly forbids voter intimidation and stationing armed federal agents at polling places."

About this source

DSCC's posting of a joint statement from Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, DSCC Chair Kirsten Gillibrand, DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene and Democratic Governors Association Chair Andy Beshear after the suit was filed.

Author
DSCC
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations

Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations (opens in a new tab)Press release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Press release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements

Excerpt

"Such harms violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation, threats, and coercion of people for voting or attempting to vote, as well as people who encourage or assist others in voting."

About this source

Announcement by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, of the suit by nine organizations. It lists the plaintiffs and their counsel and quotes lawyers and plaintiff leaders, including NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke.

Author
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

LULAC Sues Department of Homeland Security To Keep Armed ICE Officers Out Of America's Polling Places

LULAC Sues Department of Homeland Security To Keep Armed ICE Officers Out Of America's Polling Places (opens in a new tab) · League of United Latin American CitizensPress release of Sept. 10, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Press release of Sept. 10, 2026

Excerpt

"The question before the court is not about immigration."

About this source

LULAC's announcement of the suit. It names the co-plaintiffs and counsel, quotes LULAC national president Roman Palomares and chief executive Juan Proaño, and describes the claims under 18 U.S.C. 592 and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Author
LULAC
Published
Accessed

Original post

Post by PBS News (@NewsHour) on X, May 12, 2026: Trump on federal agents at polling places

Post by PBS News (@NewsHour) on X, May 12, 2026: Trump on federal agents at polling places (opens in a new tab)Complete post 2054282657228279891 with video clip, 19:28 UTC on May 12, 2026

Excerpt

"I'd do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections."

About this source

PBS News post of a video clip in which reporter Liz Landers asks President Trump whether he would send the National Guard or ICE to voting locations in November. The clip runs about 38 seconds. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio.

Author
PBS News (@NewsHour)
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026

Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: One-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph

Excerpt

"Therefore, there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."

About this source

ICE's one-page reply, signed by Todd M. Lyons as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, to the March 9 letter from nine secretaries of state. The copy was published by the Colorado Secretary of State's office.

Author
Todd M. Lyons
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."

DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places." (opens in a new tab)News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

Excerpt

"I agree that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."

About this source

Release publishing the May 11 reply from ICE's Todd Lyons. It says the reply was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries requested, quotes Griswold's reaction, and links both letters.

Author
Colorado Secretary of State's office
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling Locations

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold Leads Letter Seeking Confirmation of Homeland Security Policy on ICE at Polling Locations (opens in a new tab)News release of March 9, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: News release of March 9, 2026

Excerpt

"We are calling on the nominated Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin to confirm in writing that there will not be an ICE presence near voting locations in the 2026 election cycle."

About this source

Release announcing a letter from nine secretaries of state to then-nominee Markwayne Mullin. It lists the signatories, quotes Griswold, and quotes remarks by DHS official Heather Honey on Feb. 25 and then-Secretary Kristi Noem on March 3.

Author
Colorado Secretary of State's office
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

ICE won't be at polling places in 2026 election, Trump administration official says

ICE won't be at polling places in 2026 election, Trump administration official says (opens in a new tab) · VotebeatReport of Honey's remarks in a Feb. 25 virtual meeting with state election officials, published Feb. 26, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of Honey's remarks in a Feb. 25 virtual meeting with state election officials, published Feb. 26, 2026

Excerpt

"There will be no ICE presence at polling locations for this election."

About this source

Votebeat's report, citing five people who listened to the call, of remarks by DHS deputy assistant secretary Heather Honey to state election officials in a virtual meeting organized by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. DHS did not immediately respond to Votebeat's request for comment. The words are the participants' account; we did not locate a recording or transcript.

Author
Nathaniel Rakich
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original video

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 5, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · The White HouseQuestions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08
Watch original video (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Questions about Steve Bannon's remark and ICE at polling locations, about 31:43 to 32:08

Excerpt

"I can't guarantee that an ICE agent won't be around a polling location in November."

About this source

White House video of the Feb. 5, 2026 press briefing. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio and matches a published transcript of the briefing.

Author
Karoline Leavitt
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Steve Bannon calls for immigration agents at polling sites during midterms

Steve Bannon calls for immigration agents at polling sites during midterms (opens in a new tab) · The GuardianReport of Bannon's Feb. 3 War Room remarks, published Feb. 4, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of Bannon's Feb. 3 War Room remarks, published Feb. 4, 2026

Excerpt

"You’re damn right we’re gonna have ICE surround the polls come November."

About this source

The Guardian's report of Bannon's remarks. It describes him as a former White House strategist and podcast host who has no formal power but is closely tied to the Trump administration.

Published
Accessed

Original video

Steve Bannon: 'You're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November'

Steve Bannon: 'You're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November' (opens in a new tab) · Media Matters for AmericaWar Room broadcast of Feb. 3, 2026, opening segment
Watch original video (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: War Room broadcast of Feb. 3, 2026, opening segment

Excerpt

"you're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November."

About this source

Media Matters clip and transcript of the Feb. 3, 2026 War Room broadcast. The quoted words were checked against the audio of the clip.

Author
Steve Bannon
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Blanche: 'Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?'

Blanche: 'Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?' (opens in a new tab) · The HillReport of Blanche's CPAC remarks, published March 27, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of Blanche's CPAC remarks, published March 27, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET

Excerpt

"Illegals can’t vote. It doesn’t make any sense."

About this source

The Hill's report of Blanche's March 26 remarks at CPAC. It says DHS officials had given conflicting answers over whether ICE officers might be stationed at polling places. Its written version of the question differs slightly from the words heard in the video.

Author
Rebecca Beitsch
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original video

WATCH: Deputy AG Todd Blanche Calls To Deploy ICE Agents To Polling Sites (Forbes Breaking News video)

WATCH: Deputy AG Todd Blanche Calls To Deploy ICE Agents To Polling Sites (Forbes Breaking News video) (opens in a new tab) · ForbesCPAC 2026 conversation in Grapevine, Texas, March 26, 2026; about 1:40 to 1:55 of the clip

Excerpt

"Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places?"

About this source

Forbes Breaking News video of an on-stage conversation at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Grapevine, Texas, with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio. The Hill's written version of the question differs slightly.

Author
Todd Blanche
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original video

Tom Homan Reacts to Denver Lawsuit Seeking to Block ICE at Polls (Fox News video)

Tom Homan Reacts to Denver Lawsuit Seeking to Block ICE at Polls (Fox News video) (opens in a new tab) · Fox NewsFox News Sunday Briefing, Sept. 13, 2026; answer on polling places, about 1:05 to 1:30 and 1:55 to 2:15 of the clip
Watch original video (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Fox News Sunday Briefing, Sept. 13, 2026; answer on polling places, about 1:05 to 1:30 and 1:55 to 2:15 of the clip

Excerpt

"There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens."

About this source

Fox News video of Homan's interview with host Jacqui Heinrich. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio and matches The Hill's and CNN's reports of the same interview.

Author
Tom Homan
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

ICE has no plans to 'sweep polling locations' for noncitizens, Homan says

ICE has no plans to 'sweep polling locations' for noncitizens, Homan says (opens in a new tab) · The HillReport of Homan's Fox News Sunday Briefing remarks, published Sept. 14, 2026 at 11:07 a.m. ET
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of Homan's Fox News Sunday Briefing remarks, published Sept. 14, 2026 at 11:07 a.m. ET

Excerpt

"This is another fear tactic. This is another attack on ICE and this administration"

About this source

The Hill's report on Homan's Sept. 13 interview with Fox News host Jacqui Heinrich. It quotes Homan on polling places and on sensitive locations, and notes the LULAC suit filed the previous week.

Author
Ryan Mancini
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Will the Trump administration send federal officers or troops to the polls? Here's what we know

Will the Trump administration send federal officers or troops to the polls? Here's what we know (opens in a new tab) · CNNSections on Mullin, Patel, Caine, Homan and Trump; published Sept. 7 and updated Sept. 15, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Sections on Mullin, Patel, Caine, Homan and Trump; published Sept. 7 and updated Sept. 15, 2026

Excerpt

"There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens."

About this source

CNN explainer collecting what administration and military officials have said about troops or federal officers at polling places, including Homan's Fox News remarks, Mullin's March confirmation-hearing remarks and Patel's Sept. 15 Senate testimony.

Author
Michael Williams
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters'

Civil rights group says sending ICE to polls would 'intimidate voters' (opens in a new tab) · USA TodayReport of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of the LULAC filing and a DHS spokesperson's statement, published Sept. 10, 2026

Excerpt

"LULAC filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Sept. 10."

About this source

USA Today's report on the LULAC filing. It lists the defendants as DHS, ICE, Secretary Mullin and acting ICE director David Venturella, quotes LULAC's chief executive and Denver's mayor, and quotes a DHS spokesperson.

Author
Michael Loria
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that

It's illegal for armed federal officers to be at polls. Lawsuits seek to ensure that (opens in a new tab) · NPRDHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: DHS and White House responses to the NAACP suit and description of the LULAC and NAACP suits, published Sept. 18, 2026

Excerpt

"is not planning operations targeting polling locations."

About this source

NPR's report on the LULAC and NAACP suits. It quotes a DHS statement to NPR, reports that the White House said in response to the lawsuit that it has repeatedly addressed the issue and that the president has not discussed plans for ICE to be at polling places, and includes remarks from Denver's clerk and recorder and from counsel for the plaintiffs.

Author
Jude Joffe-Block and Miles Parks
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests

Mullin says DHS could deploy to polling sites for 'specific' threats, arrests (opens in a new tab) · PoliticoReport of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report of Mullin's remarks and the DHS statement, published Sept. 1, 2026 at 1:13 p.m. EDT

Excerpt

"ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations."

About this source

Politico's same-day report on Mullin's New York remarks. It quotes a DHS statement given when Politico asked for more clarity, and says DHS also pointed to Mullin's comments at his March confirmation hearing.

Author
Eric Bazail-Eimil
Published
Accessed

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.