At his confirmation hearing, Mullin says the "only reason" his officers would be at polling places is "a specific threat"

Markwayne MullinNominee for Secretary of Homeland Security, testifying at his Senate confirmation hearing

Asked by Sen. Elissa Slotkin at his confirmation hearing whether he would have the authority to put uniformed officers at polling locations in 2026, Mullin said, "The only reason why my officers would be there if there was a specific threat for them to be there, not for intimidation". Responding to Sen. Andy Kim's remarks about polling sites, he said, "I don't understand what the concern about enforcing immigration at polling places is anyways".

“The only reason why my officers would be there if there was a specific threat for them to be there, not for intimidation. … I don't understand what the concern about enforcing immigration at polling places is anyways, because honestly, if you're not a citizen, you shouldn't be voting anyway”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Confirmation Hearing for Homeland Security Security Nominee Markwayne Mullin (C-SPAN video) · C-SPANSenate confirmation hearing of March 18, 2026; Sen. Slotkin's questions and Mullin's answers, about 2:02:25 to 2:03:52, and Mullin's response to Sen. Kim, about 3:07:25 to 3:07:45

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Trump’s pick for DHS chief won’t rule out ICE at pollsReport of Mullin's March 18, 2026 confirmation hearing, paragraphs on the exchanges with Sens. Slotkin and Kim
A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

Confirmation Hearing for Homeland Security Security Nominee Markwayne Mullin (C-SPAN video) (opens in a new tab) · C-SPANSenate confirmation hearing of March 18, 2026; Sen. Slotkin's questions and Mullin's answers, about 2:02:25 to 2:03:52, and Mullin's response to Sen. Kim, about 3:07:25 to 3:07:45

About this source

C-SPAN's recording of the confirmation hearing for Sen. Markwayne Mullin, President Trump's nominee to succeed Kristi Noem as Homeland Security secretary. Sen. Elissa Slotkin asks whether he would have authority to put uniformed officers at polling locations in 2026, and Sen. Andy Kim raises concerns about enforcement in and around hospitals, schools, churches and polling sites. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Sen. Elissa Slotkin's questions and Markwayne Mullin's answers on officers at polling places, followed by Mullin's reply to Sen. Andy Kim, at Mullin's Mar. 18, 2026 confirmation hearing for Secretary of Homeland Security.

Two excerpts joined by a one-second black gap: about 2:12:41 to 2:14:13 and 3:17:18 to 3:18:02 of the committee's archived video of the hearing. The C-SPAN recording cited for this source shows the same exchange. DI added its logo in the corner.

Video: U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Public domain (U.S. government work) (opens in a new tab)

Watch the full original video (opens in a new tab) (relevant passage: Senate confirmation hearing of March 18, 2026; Sen. Slotkin's questions and Mullin's answers, about 2:02:25 to 2:03:52, and Mullin's response to Sen. Kim, about 3:07:25 to 3:07:45)

Reporting

Trump’s pick for DHS chief won’t rule out ICE at polls (opens in a new tab)Report of Mullin's March 18, 2026 confirmation hearing, paragraphs on the exchanges with Sens. Slotkin and Kim

About this source

Democracy Docket's report of Mullin's answers to Sens. Elissa Slotkin and Andy Kim on polling places. It quotes Mullin as saying he could not guarantee hypothetically what threat might be there or not. Its wording of the quotations differs slightly from the words heard in the video.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The hearing was Mullin's confirmation hearing to succeed Kristi Noem as Homeland Security secretary. Slotkin had just asked who won the 2020 election and whether the federal government or the states run elections.

After the quotation

Slotkin responded that Americans trust local law enforcement more than they trust ICE and that putting armed ICE officers at polling locations would mean the country had lost the plot. Democracy Docket reported that Mullin also said he could not guarantee what threat might arise.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places in the 2026 election. Mullin, then a nominee, said his officers would be at a polling place only for a specific threat and did not rule out a presence, and said he did not understand the concern about immigration enforcement there. His position turns on an express condition, so mixed or conditional fits better than defends or excuses or minimizes.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Markwayne Mullin, At his confirmation hearing, Mullin says the "only reason" his officers would be at polling places is "a specific threat"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
At his confirmation hearing, Mullin says the "only reason" his officers would be at polling places is "a specific threat"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2748-asked-by-sen-elissa-slotkin-at-his-confirmation

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "At his confirmation hearing, Mullin says the "only reason" his officers would be at polling places is "a specific threat"". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2748-asked-by-sen-elissa-slotkin-at-his-confirmation