Gault argues ICE should not observe at polling places

David GaultDane County attorney

Condemned

In an email to the Wisconsin Elections Commission administrator, Gault says there is no legitimate reason for ICE to be at a polling place and that the commission's guidance should not imply an ICE agent can be a legitimate observer. Votebeat reports that he argued a federal voter-intimidation law would bar even an unarmed but uniformed ICE agent from observing.

“There is no legitimate reason for ICE to be at a polling place,” he told Wolfe. “Everyone there is presumptively a US citizen. I don’t think WEC’s guidance should imply that an ICE agent can be a legitimate observer.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Wisconsin officials debate federal agents observing at polling placesGault email, Sharpe response and Levitt and Trueblood interviews

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Wisconsin officials debate federal agents observing at polling places (opens in a new tab)Gault email, Sharpe response and Levitt and Trueblood interviews

About this source

Original interviews distinguish armed federal personnel from unarmed observers. The report describes guidance finalized October 15; later syndicated versions are not separate reporting.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

In an October 15 email, he objects to guidance that he believes could be read to allow armed federal observers.

After the quotation

Commission attorney supervisor Angela O'Brien Sharpe disagreed, saying federal law enforcement may observe subject to Wisconsin's observer rules. Gault then called the guidance "confusing at best" and wrote that armed federal agents should not be at a polling place under any circumstances.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Gault expressly opposes ICE attendance as an election observer.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: David Gault, Gault argues ICE should not observe at polling placesDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Gault argues ICE should not observe at polling places
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6942-in-an-email-to-the-wisconsin-elections-commission

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Gault argues ICE should not observe at polling places". First published: 2026-10-27. Last updated: 2026-10-27. https://disputeindex.com/events/6942-in-an-email-to-the-wisconsin-elections-commission