IUPAT general president Jimmy Williams Jr. on deploying federal agents to polling sites

Jimmy Williams Jr.General President of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, a plaintiff in the lawsuit

Condemned

IUPAT General President Jimmy Williams Jr. said in the Legal Defense Fund's September 18 announcement of the lawsuit, "This is election interference pure and simple." He said deploying federal agents to polling sites has no place in the country and called it authoritarian fearmongering and a blatant attempt to influence elections. He said polling sites should not look like armed camps and that citizens have the right to take part in democracy without masked federal agents trying to deter them.

“This is election interference pure and simple We are a democratic union and have an obligation to stand up for democratic principles whenever they are attacked. Deploying federal agents to polling sites has no place in this country, it is authoritarian fearmongering and a blatant attempt to influence our elections. Our polling sites shouldn’t look like armed camps. American citizens have the right to engage in our democracy without having masked federal agents trying to deter them”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locationsPress release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Civil rights coalition files federal lawsuit challenging threatened use of ICE and federal law enforcement at polling locations (opens in a new tab)Press release of Sept. 18, 2026, including plaintiff and counsel statements

About this source

Announcement by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, of the suit by nine organizations. It lists the plaintiffs and their counsel and quotes lawyers and plaintiff leaders, including NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Nine organizations, including the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades and the NAACP, filed a federal lawsuit on September 18, 2026. The plaintiffs allege that the administration's statements and actions violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation, threats and coercion of people for voting or attempting to vote.

After the quotation

The release describes the plaintiffs as nine organizations representing immigrants, communities of color and workers.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case records responses to the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places. Williams said deploying federal agents to polling sites has no place in the country and called it authoritarian fearmongering, and said polling sites should not look like armed camps. That expressly rejects the practice, so we labeled it Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
U.S. Department of Homeland Security

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jimmy Williams Jr., IUPAT general president Jimmy Williams Jr. on deploying federal agents to polling sitesDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
IUPAT general president Jimmy Williams Jr. on deploying federal agents to polling sites
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3341-iupat-general-president-jimmy-williams-jr-said-in

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "IUPAT general president Jimmy Williams Jr. on deploying federal agents to polling sites". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3341-iupat-general-president-jimmy-williams-jr-said-in