Lyons writes there is "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places"

Todd LyonsSenior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Denied

In a May 11 letter to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, Todd M. Lyons wrote that "there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places" and added that ICE Homeland Security Investigations "will continue to perform this vital mission" of investigating voter fraud.

“Therefore, there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places. ICE officers and special agents are sworn federal law enforcement officials that are responsible for enforcing violations of immigration and criminal laws. However, as the principal investigative component of DHS, ICE Homeland Security Investigations plays an important role in investigating voter fraud and will continue to perform this vital mission.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places."News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Letter from Todd M. Lyons, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, May 11, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOne-page letter dated May 11, 2026, third paragraph

About this source

ICE's one-page reply, signed by Todd M. Lyons as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, to the March 9 letter from nine secretaries of state. The copy was published by the Colorado Secretary of State's office.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

DHS Responds to Letter from Nine Secretaries of State, states "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places." (opens in a new tab)News release of May 27, 2026, including Griswold's statement

About this source

Release publishing the May 11 reply from ICE's Todd Lyons. It says the reply was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries requested, quotes Griswold's reaction, and links both letters.

Before the quotation

The March 9 letter from nine secretaries of state had asked for confirmation that ICE officers and special agents will not be present at voting and election administration locations during the 2026 election.

After the quotation

The Colorado Secretary of State's office released the letter on May 27 and said it was dated more than a month after the April 8 response deadline the secretaries had requested.

How this statement is classified

Denied

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Lyons answered a request for confirmation that ICE would not be present by writing that there is no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places, which rejects the premise of a planned presence. Mixed or conditional loses because the added sentence concerns voter-fraud investigations, not a polling-place deployment.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Todd Lyons, Lyons writes there is "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lyons writes there is "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2689-in-a-may-11-letter-to-colorado-secretary

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Lyons writes there is "no reason for ICE personnel to be deployed to polling places"". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2689-in-a-may-11-letter-to-colorado-secretary