Human Rights Watch calls for a public order keeping ICE away from voting sites

Human Rights WatchHuman Rights Watch, through executive director Philippe Bolopion

Human Rights Watch says ICE agents should be publicly ordered to stay away from polls and wherever ballots are cast, arguing that the prospect of encountering agents could deter some eligible voters.

“ICE agents should be publicly ordered to stay away from the polls and anywhere ballots are being cast,”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)US: Order No ICE Zones during Election PeriodConcluding statement by executive director Philippe Bolopion
A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

US: Order No ICE Zones during Election Period (opens in a new tab)Concluding statement by executive director Philippe Bolopion

About this source

HRW urges a public prohibition on immigration enforcement near voting sites and argues that qualified assurances do not resolve intimidation risks.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The release discusses ICE's widespread abuses over the last two years and says they risk dissuading some people from voting if they expect to encounter agents near polling places.

After the quotation

The release ends with this statement.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The matter under scrutiny is allowing armed federal immigration agents at or near voting sites. Human Rights Watch opposes their presence and seeks a public prohibition.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Human Rights Watch, Human Rights Watch calls for a public order keeping ICE away from voting sitesDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Human Rights Watch calls for a public order keeping ICE away from voting sites
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6685-human-rights-watch-says-ice-agents-should-be

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Human Rights Watch calls for a public order keeping ICE away from voting sites". First published: 2026-10-24. Last updated: 2026-10-24. https://disputeindex.com/events/6685-human-rights-watch-says-ice-agents-should-be