NAACP General Counsel Clarke rejects "the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent" at polling sites
NAACPNAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke, speaking for a lead plaintiff
In the plaintiffs' September 18 announcement, NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke said the NAACP rejects an attempt to convert polling sites into "militarized zones through the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent", and said the Voting Rights Act "prohibits intimidation tactics that stand to deny and deter voters from exercising their voice and their rights".
Responding to
Federal officials' statements and actions about deploying ICE and other armed federal agents near polling places intimidate voters and violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act.
“We reject this administration’s attempt to desecrate our polling sites by converting them into militarized zones through the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent … The Voting Rights Act prohibits intimidation tactics that stand to deny and deter voters from exercising their voice and their rights.”
Official statement
Original text
Where this statement fits
Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?
Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Announcement by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, of the suit by nine organizations. It lists the plaintiffs and their counsel and quotes lawyers and plaintiff leaders, including NAACP General Counsel Kristen Clarke.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Original text
About this source
The plaintiffs' complaint. It alleges that statements and actions by federal officials about armed agents near polling places violate Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and cites statements by Trump, Mullin, Homan, Blanche, Patel and others. The complaint states the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Nine organizations including the NAACP sued in federal court in Washington under Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act.
After the quotation
The announcement, issued by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, also quoted lawyers for the plaintiffs and the leaders of other plaintiff organizations.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Clarke described the deployment of ICE or other federal agents to polling sites as unlawful and said the NAACP rejects it, which expressly condemns the practice. She set no condition, so mixed or conditional does not fit.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security
More from this case
Read the full caseGeraghty says fears of federal agents intimidating voters have so far proved unfounded
“There’s a lot of fear that the 2026 midterm elections will be disrupted by some authority, either federal or local, harassing and intimidating voters, seizing ballots, or closing polling places. That fear, so far, appears unfounded.”Read statement
Letitia James says armed federal agents are not allowed at New York polls
“I want New York voters to know the law is on their side. Armed federal agents are not allowed at polling places, and no one can use a badge, a weapon, or a threat to stop you from voting.”Read statement
Trueblood says uniformed federal observers can intimidate voters
“You standing there in your FBI vest is intimidating to voters, and so we’re not going to allow that,”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- NAACP General Counsel Clarke rejects "the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent" at polling sites
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2696-in-the-plaintiffs-september-18-announcement-naacp-general
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "NAACP General Counsel Clarke rejects "the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent" at polling sites". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2696-in-the-plaintiffs-september-18-announcement-naacp-general