Lepper says polling-place deployment could put military commanders in an unlawful position

Steven LepperRetired Air Force major general and former deputy judge advocate general

Condemned

Lepper criticizes Congress for leaving commanders to choose between rejecting unlawful election-deployment orders and obeying orders that could involve crimes.

“It’s just a shameful situation”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)NOTUS interviews senators and Lepper about election deploymentsSlotkin quotation after the tabletop-exercise discussion; Schmitt's response to NOTUS; Final two paragraphs, Former Judge Advocates General Working Group

Case updates

Following the lawsuits over armed agents at polling places?

We'll email you if the court rules in any of the three suits, the government files its answer, or officials say more about agents at polling places.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A voter uses a blue voting booth at the Denver Central Library.
Credit: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images via NPR

Where this statement fits

Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?

Since February 2026, federal officials have given differing answers about whether ICE and other armed federal agents could be at or near polling places during the November 3 election. On September 1, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said ICE would be at a polling place only if there is a threat to it or agents are serving a warrant, and DHS told Politico that ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations but that arrests could result if an active public safety threat endangered one. On September 10, 18 and 23, 2026, LULAC and other groups, a coalition including the NAACP, and Democratic leaders and party committees sued separately in federal court in Washington. They allege that the administration's statements and actions violate 18 U.S.C. 592, Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, or both. As of September 25, the court dockets show no motion for a preliminary injunction and no answer or motion to dismiss from the federal defendants, and no court has ruled.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

NOTUS interviews senators and Lepper about election deployments (opens in a new tab)Slotkin quotation after the tabletop-exercise discussion; Schmitt's response to NOTUS; Final two paragraphs, Former Judge Advocates General Working Group

About this source

The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Lepper discussed possible armed deployments during elections.

After the quotation

He warned that commanders could face unlawful orders and criticized congressional inaction.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

He condemns the prospective conduct and the risks it places on commanders.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Steven Lepper, Lepper says polling-place deployment could put military commanders in an unlawful positionDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lepper says polling-place deployment could put military commanders in an unlawful position
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4351-lepper-criticizes-congress-for-leaving-commanders-to-choose

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Lepper says polling-place deployment could put military commanders in an unlawful position". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4351-lepper-criticizes-congress-for-leaving-commanders-to-choose