Homan says "There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens"
White House border czar
“I have not seen any operational plans or any discussions on any immigration enforcement operation at polling places. This is another fear tactic. This is another attack on ICE and this administration. … I want to put that to bed. There is no plan to sweep polling places looking for illegal aliens.”
Source and context
Original video
About this source
Fox News video of Homan's interview with host Jacqui Heinrich. The quoted wording is our transcription of the video audio and matches The Hill's and CNN's reports of the same interview.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
The Hill's report on Homan's Sept. 13 interview with Fox News host Jacqui Heinrich. It quotes Homan on polling places and on sensitive locations, and notes the LULAC suit filed the previous week.
Reporting
About this source
CNN explainer collecting what administration and military officials have said about troops or federal officers at polling places, including Homan's Fox News remarks, Mullin's March confirmation-hearing remarks and Patel's Sept. 15 Senate testimony.
Before the quotation
Fox News host Jacqui Heinrich asked Homan whether there was any truth to claims that ICE would be raiding polling locations, three days after Denver and civil rights groups sued to block ICE from polling places.
After the quotation
In the same interview, The Hill reported, Homan was asked whether there has been an order for enforcement to stay away from polling places and said there is no sensitive-location policy.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The fixed reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE at or near polling places. Homan said he had seen no plans and that there is no plan to sweep polling places, which denies the alleged plan. Challenges the characterization loses because he denied the plan itself and did not merely dispute how critics describe it.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should ICE and other armed federal agents be allowed at or near polling places in the 2026 election?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“We are taking strong, joint legal action to block Donald Trump’s threats to deploy federal agents, including ICE and FBI agents, to polling places this November. … Federal law explicitly forbids voter intimidation and stationing armed federal agents at polling places.”Read statement
NAACP
“We reject this administration’s attempt to desecrate our polling sites by converting them into militarized zones through the unlawful deployment of ICE or any other federal agent … The Voting Rights Act prohibits intimidation tactics that stand to deny and deter voters from exercising their voice and their rights.”Read statement
League of United Latin American Citizens
“The question before the court is not about immigration. It is whether the federal government may post armed officers between a citizen and the voting booth. Congress answered that question in 1865, and the answer was no. Our vote is our voice, and LULAC will not stand by while any administration, of any party, tests whether that voice can be quieted.”Read statement