Ro Khanna

Portrait of Ro Khanna

United States representative from California.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Ro Khanna on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Artificial Intelligence, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 21 topics

Statements by Ro Khanna

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. representative from California

Condemned

Statement summary

Ro Khanna says Israeli settlers beat Levine and operate with impunity, and calls for cutting off aid to Israel that is used to fund settler activity and stopping the sales of these weapons.

“They operate with impunity. We need to cut off aid to Israel that is used to fund settler activity, and stop the sales of these weapons.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ro Khanna on the attack on Heidi LevineOriginal post
Why we used this label

The reference point is the October 16, 2026 beating of Washington Post photographer Heidi Levine near Abu Falah, which she and other witnesses attributed to masked Israeli settlers. Khanna says settlers beat Levine and operate with impunity and calls for cutting off aid used to fund settler activity, which condemns the attack.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. representative for California's 17th Congressional District

Condemned

Statement summary

Khanna called Hegseth unfit and said that when Congress returns, he and other members will force a vote to pass Massie's impeachment resolution and remove Hegseth.

“Hegseth is unfit. The day Congress is back, we will force a vote to pass @RepThomasMassie’s impeachment resolution and remove him.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ro Khanna's X post on forcing a vote on Massie's impeachment resolution · Ro KhannaX post
Why we used this label

The question in this case is whether the House should impeach Hegseth. Khanna calls him unfit and commits to forcing a vote to pass Massie's impeachment resolution.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. representative from California

Condemned

Statement summary

Khanna said the more the White House wants to put Trump on television, the happier he is, called it an ethics violation, and advised the White House to spend as much as it wants putting Trump on television.

“The more they want to put President Trump on television, the happier I am. Obviously, it's an ethics violation. But here's my advice, go spend as much money as you want putting Donald Trump on T.V.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Ro Khanna on publicly funded Trump ads, CNN, September 28, 2026 · CNNOpening ads segment: Ro Khanna's recorded remarks before David Urban's interview
Why we used this label

The conduct under scrutiny is federal payment for Trump-promoting ads. Khanna calls the taxpayer-funded ads an ethics violation, which rejects the use of public money, and says he welcomes their political effect. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it does not fit because welcoming the ads' political effect does not defend the payment.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for California, on his official Threads account

Condemned

Statement summary

On Threads, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said the shooting of Garces Perez "demands a full investigation," wrote that "no one should be shot in the back and denied urgent medical care," and called to "abolish ICE" and "prosecute rogue agents."

“ICE shot a DoorDash driver in the back in Austin. Instead of taking him to the hospital, they carted him off to a detention center with the bullet still in his back. No one should be shot in the back and denied urgent medical care. The shooting of Venezuelan delivery driver Wilber Garcés Pérez by ICE in Austin demands a full investigation. Abolish ICE. Prosecute rogue agents.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Post by Rep. Ro Khanna (@rokhannausa) on Threads, September 22, 2026Complete post, viewed roughly 2 hours after posting
Why we used this label

Relative to whether ICE's use of force against Wilber Rafael Garces Perez should be condemned or condoned, Khanna directly denounces the shooting and the agency's post-shooting handling of him, and calls for both an investigation and the prosecution of the officers involved, a clear condemnation.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: United States representative for California’s 17th congressional district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Khanna called for a U.S.–China international agreement on AI safeguards, including a ban on recursively self-improving systems and controls against AI misuse in biological or nuclear weapons.

“The first ask is of Trump and Xi Jinping to come up with an international agreement. ... [B]anning any self-improving AI, recursive self-improving AI.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Ro Khanna calls for an international ban on self-improving AIRo Khanna interview: response beginning “The first ask is of Trump and Xi Jinping...” and passage calling for “banning any self-improving AI, recursive self-improving AI.”
Why we used this label

Khanna endorsed stronger safeguards by proposing an international agreement that would prohibit recursively self-improving systems and add limits on misuse.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, California 17th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Ro Khanna voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for California's 17th congressional district, posting on his verified X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Responding to Dario Amodei's announcement of his essay on pacing frontier AI development and Anthropic's commitment to give third-party evaluators permanent employee-level access, Rep. Ro Khanna said the proposal does not go nearly far enough. He called for pausing recursive self-improving AI and for criminal and civil liability for AI that causes damage, said technology executives use opaque jargon to keep the public in the dark, and asked Amodei to state his probability-of-doom estimate. His characterisation of industry leaders is his own.

“The tech lords act like priests who know Latin & keep the rest of us in the dark. Get beyond the opaque jargon and its pretty straightforward. Amodei doesn't go nearly far enough. We must pause recursive self improving AI. We must have criminal and civil liability for AI that damages us. What is your P(doom), probability of doom, number Dario?”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ro Khanna: "Amodei doesn't go nearly far enough"Post text, with an attached 1:11 video, quote-posting Dario Amodei's September 12 announcement of his essay "We Must Pace the Frontier."
Why we used this label

Khanna says Amodei's voluntary steps do not go far enough and calls for a pause and enforceable liability. He criticizes the adequacy of company-led safeguards.

Portrait of Ro Khanna

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Condemned

Statement summary

Khanna criticized Flock-style surveillance and joined a bill to bar federal funding for the cameras.

“We can't have a surveillance state in America”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)We asked candidates if San Francisco should keep Flock surveillanceCandidate responses under support, opposition, and no position
Why we used this label

He rejects the network's surveillance model, while the bill addresses federal funding rather than all local use.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated