Jamie Raskin

Portrait of Jamie Raskin
U.S. House of Representatives Office of Photography

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic United States representative from Maryland and a constitutional-law scholar. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee and previously taught constitutional law.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Jamie Raskin on 2026 Midterm Elections, Arts and Culture, and Free Speech, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 22 topics

Statements by Jamie Raskin

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Maryland's 8th District

Condemned

Response to this claim

Harris's attempt to stop the reporter recording public remarks amounts to censorship of the press.

“But he’s obviously following Donald Trump in his efforts to censor and stifle the press.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Raskin criticizes Harris's treatment of a reporter · The Baltimore BannerBrenda Wintrode report, Raskin response
Why we used this label

Raskin expressly characterizes the conduct under scrutiny as censorship and stifling the press.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, in a joint letter with Rep. Jim Himes

Condemned

Response to this claim

FBI Director Kash Patel is scheduled to visit Russia on October 14 and 15, 2026, first stopping in Moscow and then St. Petersburg, with the FSB likely to host him.

“In the interest of national security, we ask you to reconsider. Call off this trip.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Letter from Reps. Jamie Raskin and Jim Himes to FBI Director Kash Patel about his reported Russia trip · Jamie RaskinFull letter, pages 1-5
Why we used this label

The case centers on Patel's reported trip to Russia hosted by the FSB. Raskin asks Patel to cancel it on national security grounds, so we used condemns.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. representative and ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Jamie Raskin joins a letter alleging that the Trump ads misuse public funds and requesting GAO and OSC investigations.

“These ads constitute an illegal use of taxpayer funds”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Raskin and Whitesides request investigations of taxpayer-funded Trump adsPages 1-3: legal allegations; page 4: investigation requests and signatures
Why we used this label

The co-signed letter condemns public payment for the ads and seeks accountability.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. representative from Maryland, posting on his official account

Condemned

Statement summary

Raskin accused Trump of banning news organizations that would not lie for him and said media organizations should boycott the White House if the president continued violating press freedom.

“After illegally bulldozing half of the White House, Trump bans media that won’t lie for him from the other half. Every self-respecting media entity in America should boycott what’s left of the White House if he keeps violating press freedom.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Jamie Raskin calls for a media boycott if Trump continues violating press freedom · Jamie RaskinPost by @RepRaskin, September 18, 2026, 4:28 PM EDT
Why we used this label

Raskin characterizes the exclusions as a violation of press freedom and urges collective action against them.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. Representative from Maryland, in a quote-post on his official X account (@RepRaskin)

Condemned

Statement summary

In a post quoting an Associated Press report that fencing had gone up around the main Kennedy Center building after the board voted to close it, Raskin calls closing the center an affront to President Kennedy's memory, an attack on Congressional power and an assault on the livelihoods of the artists and workers who operate and perform there. He adds, 'We're demanding it remain open and free from the President's graffiti, vandalism and desecration.'

“Closing the Kennedy Center is an affront to President Kennedy's memory, an attack on Congressional power and an outrageous assault on the livelihoods of the artists and workers who operate and perform in our cultural center. We're demanding it remain open and free from the President’s graffiti, vandalism and desecration.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Jamie Raskin (@RepRaskin) on X, 16 Sep 2026: "Closing the Kennedy Center is an affront to President Kennedy's memory..." · Jamie RaskinFull post text (long-form note); posted 2026-09-16 18:34:33 UTC (2:34 PM ET)
Why we used this label

Raskin's own words call closing the center 'an affront to President Kennedy's memory' and demand that it 'remain open and free from the President's graffiti, vandalism and desecration', which rejects the closure and condemns the President's conduct toward the building without mentioning recognition by name. The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, because part of the post recasts the President's conduct in its own labels. That loses because the passage goes on to express a clearer substantive condemnation of the closure, which the label guide places under condemns.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Maryland 8th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Jamie Raskin voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: United States representative, Meet the Press interview

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

Raskin dismisses the dispute over Piker as an electoral distraction while explicitly condemning Hamas and also rejecting Netanyahu's policies.

“I think all of that is an irrelevant distraction.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Jamie Raskin responds to Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison on Meet the Press
Why we used this label

Raskin calls the dispute a distraction and expressly says it will not be worked out before the election, redirecting to domestic priorities. Criticism of Hamas and Netanyahu is not a mixed stance on Piker’s inclusion.

Portrait of Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Maryland and ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Jamie Raskin and Pramila Jayapal wrote to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and acting ICE Director David Venturella on July 30, 2026 that DHS made false and unsubstantiated allegations about people its agents shot, including Ruben Ray Martinez, and that later evidence contradicted DHS's claims that they were attacking officers. They asked DHS to equip every agent with a functioning body-worn camera and to hold agents accountable who do not turn them on.

“DHS and its component agencies have consistently made false and unsubstantiated allegations about people its agents shot, including Renée Good, Alex Pretti, Ruben Ray Martinez, and Marimar Martinez. DHS initially claimed these U.S. citizens, all of whom they either killed or maimed, were attacking law enforcement officers. In each case, evidence later emerged that definitively contradicted the government's claims, showing that DHS made false or misleading statements.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Raskin and Jayapal demand functional body cameras for ICE agentsJuly 30 letter, page 2 paragraph naming Marimar Martinez; requests on pages 2-3 and signatures on page 3.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Stevens was justified in shooting Martinez. The letter says DHS claimed Martinez and other U.S. citizens its agents killed or maimed were attacking officers, and that evidence later definitively contradicted those claims. That rejects the justification offered for the shooting, so we labeled it Condemned. Challenged the characterization is the closest competing label; it loses because the letter goes beyond disputing a description and treats the killing as resting on claims it calls false.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Hasan Piker said he preferred Hamas over Israel in a hypothetical, using lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau and the ADL rejected the comparison; Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes while maintaining that Israeli occupation was his overriding concern.

IsraelPolitical ViolenceUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Case

Does Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners conflict with his role in Middle East negotiations, as congressional Democrats and ethics groups say?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Congressional Democrats and ethics groups say Jared Kushner's investment firm, Affinity Partners, conflicts with his role in Middle East negotiations. Kushner, his lawyers and the White House dispute that. CNN found no indication his diplomacy directly affected the investments it reviewed.

IsraelGovernment TransparencyUpdated