Gavin Newsom

Portrait of Gavin Newsom
Charles Ommanney / Office of the Governor of California

Gavin Newsom is the Democratic governor of California. He previously held office as California lieutenant governor and mayor of San Francisco. Before entering public office, he worked in the hospitality business.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Gavin Newsom on 2026 Midterm Elections, Artificial Intelligence, and Election Security, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 15 topics

Statements by Gavin Newsom

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California

Condemned

Statement summary

Newsom says California fought back against the federalization and created legal precedent protecting Californians and other Americans.

“California fought back against this potential power grab”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Bonta and Newsom respond to the October 23 Guard ruling · Rob BontaSeparate Bonta and Newsom quotation blocks
Why we used this label

The case concerns Trump's initial federalization of California National Guard troops for Los Angeles. Newsom condemns Trump's federalization and welcomes the appellate result.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California

Condemned

Response to this claim

Trump was saying that foreign enemies of the United States should "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego.

“After sending the National Guard and Marines to occupy California, Donald Trump is now saying our foreign enemies should “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Gavin Newsom's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark · Gavin NewsomOriginal post
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Newsom reads the remark as Trump saying foreign enemies should attack the two cities and calls him dangerous, which asserts and condemns the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but Newsom does more than dispute a description: he states what he says Trump meant and criticizes it. Evidence: Newsom's own post on X.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California, in a news release from his office announcing the signed bills

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said on September 29, 2026 that California cannot dictate federal immigration policy but that, where federal immigration enforcement operates in California, the state can establish and enforce requirements governing law-enforcement practices, and it listed AB 2760's ban on shock gloves among the standards it set.

“California cannot dictate federal immigration policy. But where federal immigration enforcement operates within California, the state can establish and enforce state-law requirements governing state property, state resources, detention facilities, public records, law-enforcement practices and access to state-administered programs.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Governor Newsom signs bills to push back on Trump's Orwellian immigration tactics to protect immigrant communities · Gavin NewsomGovernor's news release of September 29, 2026: Newsom statement, 'California cannot dictate federal immigration policy' paragraph, and 'Establish stronger standards for law-enforcement practices' list
Why we used this label

Relative to California's ban on shock gloves as applied to federal officers, the Governor's office says the state may set law-enforcement requirements where federal immigration enforcement operates in California and lists the ban among the standards it set. That defends the state's authority to set law-enforcement equipment standards where federal enforcement operates, and the release lists the ban among them, so we used Defended or excused. The release does not say in terms that the ban reaches federal officers. The release answers the question of state power and says nothing on whether the gloves are safe. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because the same passage says the state cannot dictate federal immigration policy, but that limit concerns immigration policy and does not condition the office's support for the equipment ban.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In his veto message, Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote that, while he supports the author's goal of protecting Californians' sensitive personal information, a categorical ban on sharing that information is a step too far.

“a categorical ban on sharing that information is a step too far”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Governor Gavin Newsom's veto message for AB 1542Page 1: consumer choice, scope of the prohibition and enforcement costs
Why we used this label

The reference point is Newsom's decision to veto AB 1542, the bill that would have barred businesses from selling or sharing sensitive personal information. Newsom explains that a categorical ban on sharing is a step too far, which supports the veto as the right call, so we labeled it Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he also says he supports the bill's goal; he still declines to sign it, so it loses.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California

Condemned

Response to this claim

Elections Code section 15551(d) requires that voted ballots never be taken from the elections official's custody, so Sheriff Bianco violated it when he removed the Riverside County ballots from the Registrar of Voters, even under a search warrant.

“Governor Gavin Newsom today released the following statement in response to the California Supreme Court ruling Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco illegally seized hundreds of thousands of ballots from last year’s special election … Today’s ruling affirms that in California we will defend democracy — using every branch of government. And the new laws I signed just last week add new protections so attacks like this cannot happen again. People deserve to know their ballot is counted and secure, and in California we will do everything we can to protect that constitutional right — this year, and beyond.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Governor Newsom on the California Supreme Court ruling Sheriff Bianco illegally seized ballots · Gavin NewsomPress release, statement of Governor Gavin Newsom
Why we used this label

The reference point is the sheriff's seizure and handling of the ballots. The Governor describes the seizure as illegal and as an attack that new laws are meant to prevent, which expressly rejects the conduct.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California, on his official X account

Condemned

Statement summary

On X, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) responded to the White House's launch of a "Trump TV" livestream by writing that Trump "banned independent news from the White House" and is "now... launching what is quite literally state-run TV," which he called "truly autocratic behavior from a failed President."

“First, Trump banned independent news from the White House. Now, he's launching what is quite literally state-run TV to try drowning out the fact that he and his corrupt administration are failing the American people. This is truly autocratic behavior from a failed President.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Post by Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) on X, September 21, 2026Complete post 2102188172402987045, 8:08 PM EDT (00:08:11 UTC Sept. 22)
Why we used this label

Relative to Trump's decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access because of their coverage, Newsom links the new state-run livestream to that exclusion and directly condemns both as autocratic.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: Governor of California, posting on his official X account and through his office's official press release

Defended or excused

Statement summary

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order accelerating implementation of the state's independent AI oversight laws (SB 813 and AB 1405), directing state agencies to convene experts on further measures including a frontier-model "kill switch," citing the Hugging Face attack as a motivating incident. He called on Speaker Mike Johnson to return from recess and pass national legislation modeled on California's framework, saying California will continue to act if Congress does not.

“Today I'm signing an executive order to speed up a first in America AI safety policy that we have here in California. [...] It dramatically speeds up our new law, creating a framework for truly independent safety checks, independent verification organizations, as well as moving the timeline up for oversight of AI auditors up by a full year. [...] California will do what it can, but this nation needs to get in the game. Washington DC needs to do its job. Remarkably, they left for a summer break. Mike Johnson should return from vacation and follow California's lead by passing national legislation. Get it done. That's what leadership requires, setting a comprehensive safety framework as a floor. [...] And if Congress, again, won't act, California will.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Governor Newsom issues executive order to accelerate independent oversight and advance the creation of an AI kill switch · Gavin NewsomOfficial press release with attributed quote from Governor Newsom.
Why we used this label

Newsom endorses it directly, both through his own state action and by explicitly calling on Congress, naming Speaker Johnson, to pass comparable federal legislation. That places him with the same week's cluster of Democratic officials making this argument: Jeffries (985), Ansari (988), Crow (995), Shapiro (1011) and Pritzker (1013). The closest competing label is condemns, since the statement criticizes Trump and Congress as "asleep at the wheel"; that loses because the criticism is that they have failed to enact safeguards Newsom supports, which endorses the proposition. Unlike Shapiro and Pritzker, Newsom's statement is backed by an actual executive order and existing state law (SB 53, SB 813, AB 1405) rather than a stated aspiration alone.

Portrait of Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

Role at the time: California governor

Condemned

Statement summary

Newsom welcomes the ruling and condemns Trump’s election actions as un-American.

“California stood up for democracy and we won”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Weber, Bonta and Newsom respond to Supreme Court mail-voting decisionPress release 26-116; separately attributed quotation blocks
Why we used this label

Rejects the administration’s changes and supports blocking enforcement.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.