Loading record
Public disputes concerning personal privacy, private information, unwanted publicity, and the public handling of personal or family matters.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: April 2, 2024 to September 27, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: April 2, 2024 to September 27, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: April 2, 2024 to September 27, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: April 2, 2024 to September 27, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: April 2, 2024 to September 27, 2026
Role at the time: Governor of California
Statement summary
In his veto message, Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote that, while he supports the author's goal of protecting Californians' sensitive personal information, a categorical ban on sharing that information is a step too far.
“a categorical ban on sharing that information is a step too far”
Newsom's signed message explains his reasons for vetoing the sensitive-data bill.
The reference point is Newsom's decision to veto AB 1542, the bill that would have barred businesses from selling or sharing sensitive personal information. Newsom explains that a categorical ban on sharing is a step too far, which supports the veto as the right call, so we labeled it Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he also says he supports the bill's goal; he still declines to sign it, so it loses.
Role at the time: California governor
Statement summary
Newsom endorsed a 480-camera Flock network in Oakland and the East Bay as a tool for criminal investigations.
“we're equipping law enforcement with the tools they need to effectively combat criminal activity and hold perpetrators accountable”
Newsom announced a California Highway Patrol contract for fixed and highway cameras.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Relative to the continued existence of networked ALPR surveillance, Newsom expressly supports the deployment for law enforcement.
