Mark Warner

Portrait of Mark Warner
Ryan Donnell

United States Senator (Democratic) from Virginia.

What we have documented

We have documented 6 statements by Mark Warner, in 4 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Mark Warner

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Virginia

Condemned

Statement summary

Mark Warner voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Virginia and ex officio trustee of the Kennedy Center, in an official Senate press release

Condemned

Statement summary

In an official Senate press release on the Kennedy Center board’s September 15 meeting, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), an ex officio trustee, said the board’s vote to close the Center immediately means the country is losing one of its premier arts and cultural institutions. He said the president would rather close the Center because it cannot have his name on the building than work with Congress to renovate it.

“With the president’s handpicked board voting to close the Center immediately, we are losing one of the country’s premier arts and cultural institutions. It is a shame the president would rather close the Center because it cannot have his name on the building, rather than work with Congress to renovate the building.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Warner Statement on Kennedy Center Closure · Mark WarnerStatement text, third paragraph (final two sentences)
Why we used this label

Warner's release, issued on the evening of September 15 after the board's closure vote and that post, rejects the linkage in his own words: he says the president "would rather close the Center because it cannot have his name on the building, rather than work with Congress to renovate the building." The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”, because the release acknowledges that the Center "has its own challenges." That loses because the acknowledgment is the premise for the criticism that follows, not a competing position, and the release ends by faulting the closure itself.

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Virginia, in a joint statement with Senator Tim Kaine

Condemned

Statement summary

Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine condemned the reported direction to DHS personnel to falsely identify themselves as Virginia voters to access registration records. They said officials who violated the law should be held accountable and pledged to protect voter information and prevent wrongful removals from voter rolls.

“working for the federal government doesn't mean you can break the law”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Warner and Kaine call for accountability over alleged false voter-portal attestationsJoint quotation, first and final sentences
Why we used this label

Warner and Kaine condemn the reported false voter-portal attestations and call for accountability. Their qualification about which officials violated the law preserves uncertainty about the allegations rather than support for the conduct.

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Virginia

Condemned

Statement summary

Mark Warner voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Virginia at the statement date.

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a February 28 statement that the decision to take the nation to war rests with Congress and that launching large-scale military operations without an imminent threat raises serious legal and constitutional concerns. He called for a congressional briefing, a clear legal justification and a defined end state.

“The Constitution is clear: the decision to take this nation to war rests with Congress, and launching large-scale military operations – particularly in the absence of an imminent threat to the United States – raises serious legal and constitutional concerns.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Statement of Sen. Warner on Military Action in IranComplete original statement; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

The case asks about support for the war in Iran. Warner criticizes the strikes as launched without congressional authorization or an imminent threat, so we used Condemned. Mixed or conditional was the closest label because he also describes Iran's leadership as a sponsor of terrorism, but he says that does not relieve a president of acting within the law.

Portrait of Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Virginia, in a joint letter with Sen. Kaine to the DHS inspector general

Condemned

Statement summary

Warner and Kaine asked the DHS inspector general to audit the department's immigration-related data procurements, saying DHS has used tools including Flock license plate scanning software without official access and that the tools could let DHS circumvent Fourth Amendment protections.

“Together, ICE's new information collection tools potentially enable DHS to circumvent the constitutional protections provided by the Fourth Amendment - protections guaranteed to all Americans and all persons within our borders.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Warner, Kaine Demand Investigation into DHS Use of Surveillance TechnologyJoint letter to DHS Inspector General Cuffari, item 9 and closing passage
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. The letter criticizes DHS use of Flock license plate scanning software and asks for an audit, but names no remedy for license-plate networks themselves, so it is placed with critical statements that do not name a remedy.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage