Lisa Murkowski

Portrait of Lisa Murkowski
U.S. Congress

United States Senator (Republican) from Alaska.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Lisa Murkowski

Portrait of Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Alaska

Condemned

Statement summary

Lisa Murkowski voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Portrait of Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Alaska, on her X account (@lisamurkowski)

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

In a post on X, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said she is “encouraged that our nations have reached a breakthrough that respects Greenlandic self-determination and the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark while strengthening our shared security in the Arctic.” She said she is “hopeful that this agreement will build upon the longstanding framework established by the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement” and believes it “represents an important opportunity to further strengthen our bond.” The post links to an Associated Press report on the agreement.

“I’m encouraged that our nations have reached a breakthrough that respects Greenlandic self-determination and the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark while strengthening our shared security in the Arctic. I’m hopeful that this agreement will build upon the longstanding framework established by the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement, adapting our cooperation to address today’s security challenges while preserving the foundation that has supported our partnership. I have always had faith in the enduring friendship between the United States, Greenland, and Denmark, and I believe this agreement represents an important opportunity to further strengthen our bond.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Post by Lisa Murkowski (@lisamurkowski) on X, September 19, 2026 · Lisa MurkowskiComplete post 2101336911017128337, 11:45 AM EDT (15:45 UTC); all three paragraphs
Why we used this label

Murkowski welcomes the agreement as a “breakthrough” and “an important opportunity,” but describes it as one that respects Greenlandic self-determination and Danish sovereignty and hopes it will build on the framework of the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement. She neither mentions nor disputes Trump’s description, and her welcome is expressed as encouragement and hope rather than as endorsement of the terms Trump describes. The closest competing label is “Defended or excused”, because she welcomes the deal; it loses because her framing is sovereignty and continuity with the 1951 framework rather than the description Trump gives. “Challenged the characterization” also loses, because she does not dispute that description.

Portrait of Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Alaska

Condemned

Statement summary

Lisa Murkowski voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Topics in this coverage