John Thune

Portrait of John Thune
U.S. Senate Photographic Studio

John Thune is a U.S. senator from South Dakota and the Senate majority leader.

What we have documented

We have documented statements by John Thune on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Artificial Intelligence, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow "Would Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act protect households from data-center costs?" and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 15 topics

Statements by John Thune

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: Senate majority leader

Defended or excused

Statement summary

John Thune cites the bill's broad House support to reject claims that it lacks consequence.

“I don’t know how you can say something that passed the House of Representatives 417-3 isn’t consequential,”
Open source (opens in a new tab)NBC interview reporting on Senate debate over the ratepayer billThune response to arguments that the bill is only a political gesture
Why we used this label

Thune defends the bill's significance and argues that it could become law.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: Senate majority leader; U.S. senator from South Dakota

Condemned

Statement summary

John Thune approves the ads' message but opposes paying for them with taxpayer dollars.

“It's a great message. I like the message. But it shouldn't be paid for with taxpayer dollars.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Lawmakers cry foul over publicly funded Trump TV ads · Roll CallParagraphs quoting John Thune and Thom Tillis
Why we used this label

The conduct under scrutiny is federal funding for Trump-promoting ads. Thune rejects that funding; liking the message does not defend the spending.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: U.S. senator from South Dakota and Senate majority leader, speaking to reporters in Atlanta

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Capitol Beat reported that Senate Majority Leader John Thune, speaking with Collins in Atlanta, dismissed Democrats' attacks over Collins's reported connections to white supremacists. In his own words, Thune said that in any campaign there are a lot of allegations and that a lot of them turn out to be unfounded. According to the report, he also said Ossoff's focus on the issue was a "desperate attack" to draw attention away from his own voting record.

“In any campaign there are a lot of allegations, and a lot of them turn out to be unfounded”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Senate Majority Leader Thune defends Mike Collins against extremist allegationsThune's remarks to reporters at the Cross Creek Cafe in Atlanta
Why we used this label

Relative to Collins's staffing and associations, Thune says a lot of campaign allegations turn out to be unfounded and, according to the report, calls Ossoff's focus on the issue a desperate attack, which defends Collins against the charge. He did not say which reports he considered unfounded, so the label rests on that general dismissal.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, South Dakota

Defended or excused

Statement summary

John Thune voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: Senate majority leader

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

John Thune rejected the suggestion that Collins participated in a pay-to-play scheme, calling the allegations politically motivated.

“a political hit job”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Collins campaign and John Thune respond to Navatek allegationsConcluding paragraph, Thune's response; Opening section, Wednesday campaign-manager response
Why we used this label

Denies the alleged exchange; does not defend bribery.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: United States Senator for South Dakota and Senate Majority Leader, answering reporters’ questions on Capitol Hill

Minimized

Statement summary

Asked by a reporter on Capitol Hill how concerned he was about the president’s remarks on the Kennedy Center, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he hoped they were “designed to get people to come to the table and work something out on everything related to the Kennedy Center, including the name,” and that he would be “very, very surprised if that actually happened.” Asked whether Congress would try to stop it, he said “I hope we won’t get to that point.”

“I hope it’s, you know, designed to get people to come to the table and work something out on everything related to the Kennedy Center, including the name, but you know, I mean, I’d be very, very surprised if that actually happened.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)NBC News live blog, September 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. ET: Senate Majority Leader Thune on the Kennedy Center · NBC NewsItem timestamped 2:51 PM EDT (anchor #rcrd120540), second paragraph
Why we used this label

Thune says he hopes the president’s remarks are meant to bring people to the table on “everything related to the Kennedy Center, including the name,” and that he would be “very, very surprised if that actually happened,” which discounts the likelihood of the outcome named in the remarks without rejecting or endorsing the position. The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, since he offers a reading of the remarks as aimed at getting people to the table. That loses because he frames it as a hope rather than disputing how the remarks are described, and his operative point is that the outcome is unlikely, which downplays its likely consequence.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: United States Senate majority leader

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Congress has a role in addressing consequential risks from frontier AI and that guardrails for those models make sense, while stressing that policy should not stifle innovation.

“Guardrails there make sense to me.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)AP reports John Thune’s comments on congressional AI guardrailsSeptember 14, 2026 report; Thune comments to reporters
Why we used this label

Relative to stronger federal safeguards for frontier AI, Thune explicitly endorses guardrails for consequential frontier-model risks. His emphasis on innovation limits the approach’s scope but does not reject safeguards.

Portrait of John Thune

John Thune

Role at the time: U.S. senator from South Dakota and Senate majority leader

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

Bloomberg reported that John Thune declined to answer whether the Republican-controlled Senate would approve Trump’s proposed $5,000 payments.

“Well, that’s a good question. We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Bloomberg reporting on congressional responses to Trump’s $5,000 proposalParagraphs quoting Thune, Smith, Burgum, Scalise, Cruz and Norman.
Why we used this label

The report describes Thune as declining to answer the question. His quotation defers a position rather than expressing support or opposition.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated