Dick Durbin

Portrait of Dick Durbin
U.S. Senate

U.S. Senator (D-IL); Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee.

What we have documented

We have documented statements by Dick Durbin on 2026 Midterm Elections, Campaign Finance, and Criminal Justice Policy, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 18 topics

Statements by Dick Durbin

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: U.S. senator and lead cosponsor, in a statement quoted by Roll Call

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Durbin welcomes legislative routes to enact STOP CSAM during the lame-duck session.

“During the lame duck, I welcome all avenues to push the STOP CSAM Act across the finish line.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Online exploitation bill backers gear up for lame-duck pushDurbin statement and NDAA discussion
Why we used this label

Relative to the proposal under scrutiny, Durbin expressly advocates its passage.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. senator from Illinois

Condemned

Statement summary

Durbin welcomes Hubbard's release, says he never should have been jailed, and calls describing Putin as a humanitarian a disgrace to the Ukrainian soldiers and civilians Putin has killed.

“Calling the war criminal Vladimir Putin a "humanitarian" is a disgrace to the tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and civilians that Putin has killed as part of his brutal war.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Dick Durbin on Hubbard's release and Witkoff's "humanitarian" remarkText of post 2112923535811178509, quoting a clip of Witkoff posted by @Gerashchenko_en
Why we used this label

The case looks at Witkoff calling Putin a humanitarian. Durbin calls that description a disgrace, so we labeled it a condemnation.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: US senator from Illinois and co-chair of the Senate Ukraine Caucus

Condemned

Statement summary

Dick Durbin says negotiations over Ukraine's future must include Ukraine and that its future is not for Trump to sell out to Putin and Xi.

“Any negotiations about the future of Ukraine after years defending against Russian assault must include Ukraine. Ukraine has earned its freedom and right to determine its future—which are not for President Trump to sell out to Putin and Chinese President Xi because his halfhearted efforts to end the war have failed.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Durbin criticizes sanctions relief and says Trump cannot sell out UkraineSecond paragraph of the quoted statement
Why we used this label

Durbin's statement responds to actions it says further cater to Putin, including the sanctions waiver, and says Ukraine's future is not Trump's to sell out to Putin and Xi.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Illinois; signatory to the joint October 15 letter

Condemned

Statement summary

Dick Durbin signed a joint letter with eight other senators requesting an inspector-general investigation into reported Starshield restrictions and intelligence-warning disruptions in Ukraine. The letter questions Defense Department oversight and asks whether government or contractor decisions contributed.

“Any restrictions on these capabilities, particularly without advance notification, raise serious questions about the Department of Defense’s contractual oversight and its responsibility to ensure continuity of essential services.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Nine senators request an investigation of Ukraine communications disruptionsPages 1-2: concerns and investigation requests; page 3: nine signatures
Why we used this label

The reference point is the restriction and its oversight. The signers criticize the lack of notice and question the Department of Defense response. Their investigation request leaves the cause and responsible officials unresolved.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Illinois, in a post on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Dick Durbin said public executions have no place in a democracy and that the nation cannot stoop to the level of the people it seeks to punish.

“Public executions have no place in a democracy.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Dick Durbin's post on the plan to livestream Nidal Hasan's execution (X post) · Dick DurbinFull post, Oct. 9, 2026, 12:45 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Pete Hegseth should livestream Nidal Hasan's execution; it concerns the broadcast proposal, not Hasan's conviction or capital punishment. Durbin says "Public executions have no place in a democracy" in response to the livestream plan. That opposes the broadcast, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because the post contains no support for the plan.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member, writing with committee Democrats

Condemned

Statement summary

Durbin asks Grassley to provide records and apologize to Smith on the committee's behalf. The letter calls the perjury accusations false.

“apologize to Mr. Smith on behalf of the Committee for the unacceptable personal attacks and false accusations of perjury”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senate Judiciary Democrats request committee records and an apology to Jack SmithPages 1-2, opening request for an apology and discussion of Schmitt's basketball-game accusation; page 3, signatures.
Why we used this label

The letter describes the attacks as unacceptable and the accusations as false, expressing condemnation of Schmitt's questioning.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Illinois and Senate Democratic whip

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. Dick Durbin called the Iran war unnecessary and illegal. He said Trump had ignored Congress's constitutional power to declare war and connected the fighting to higher fuel costs.

“Every day you fill up your gas tank, a trucker fills up their diesel tank, a farmer goes out in the field--and we are harvesting now in Illinois--and sees the cost of diesel fuel, every day, you remember this is a creation of the President of the United States for a war that was unnecessary, illegal, and didn't follow the Constitution at its outset.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Dick Durbin speaks on the Iran war in the SenateSeptember 28, 2026, p. S5023, Dick Durbin's remarks on Iran
Why we used this label

The case asks about support for the war in Iran. Dick Durbin expressly criticizes the war, so we used Condemned.

Portrait of Dick Durbin

Dick Durbin

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Illinois

Condemned

Statement summary

Dick Durbin voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Trump waives the Graham Act's Russia sanctions

Relationship to this case: Speaker

The White House says waiving the Graham Act's Russia measures preserves room for peace negotiations. Lawmakers from both parties and Volodymyr Zelenskyy say relief weakens pressure on Russia. Thomas Massie welcomes Trump's use of the authority Congress granted.

RussiaInternational RelationsUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated
Older cases