United States Senator and Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts.
Case
Networked automated license-plate cameras can assemble searchable records of vehicle movements. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to ban the systems, keep them with limits, or defend them as investigative tools. This tracker separates outright bans from narrower restrictions.
Case
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Case
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin says ICE would go to polling places only for a threat or a warrant, and DHS says ICE is not planning operations targeting them but arrests could follow a threat. Three lawsuits allege that position violates federal law.
Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Massachusetts
Statement summary
Edward J. Markey voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. senator, lead signer of a letter from 12 senators
Statement summary
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) led a letter signed by 11 other Democratic and independent senators to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The letter says Americans "should never have to wonder whether the federal government intends to police the ballot box with armed agents" and that this "is precisely what the Trump administration appears to be considering, if not planning".
“Americans should never have to wonder whether the federal government intends to police the ballot box with armed agents. Yet that is precisely what the Trump administration appears to be considering, if not planning. … The Administration now has a choice. It can continue to fuel the appearance that it is laying the groundwork for an unprecedented federal intrusion into state-run elections, or it can finally provide Congress and the American people with the transparency they deserve.”
The reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places in the 2026 election. The letter says senior officials have repeatedly refused to rule out deploying federal law enforcement at polling places, that federal law bars it, and that the administration appears to be considering or planning it. That criticizes the stated or threatened use directly, so condemns fits better than mixed or conditional.
Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Massachusetts
Statement summary
Edward Markey voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. senator from Massachusetts, in a written statement from his office
Statement summary
Markey welcomed Amazon Ring's decision to end its planned partnership with Flock Safety, calling it an important step against the expanding surveillance network, and said Amazon must also end facial recognition in Ring doorbells.
“Amazon's decision to abandon its partnership with Flock is an important step in guarding against the ever-expanding network of surveillance technologies in this country.”
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Markey's statement criticizes the expansion of surveillance networks and praises a company's withdrawal from integration with Flock, but it names no remedy for license-plate networks themselves, so it is placed with critical statements that do not name a remedy.
Statement dates: June 23, 2026 to September 24, 2026
Statement dates: July 28, 2026
Statement dates: June 23, 2026 to September 24, 2026
Statement dates: July 28, 2026
Statement dates: February 13, 2026
Statement dates: February 13, 2026
Statement dates: June 23, 2026 to September 24, 2026
Statement dates: July 28, 2026
