Anna Paulina Luna

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

United States representative from Florida.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Anna Paulina Luna on 2026 Midterm Elections, Government Transparency, and Immigration Policy, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 11 topics

Statements by Anna Paulina Luna

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Florida's 13th congressional district, on her official X account and in a Fox News interview

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) posted on X that the situation was "completely avoidable" because sanctuary cities refuse to work with ICE. In a separate Fox News interview the same day, she said she would "continue to obviously ensure that there is oversight and accountability" as a member of a relevant committee, while also saying ICE "does go after... some of the worst of the worst" and that "we just don't know enough facts to really determine what really happened right here."

“This unfortunate situation was completely avoidable. In many sanctuary cities there is a refusal to work with ICE, which, if you are concerned for residents safety, don't you think you should have LEO interfacing? I will continue to obviously ensure that there is oversight and accountability – I sit on that committee – and I'm sure this will be brought up as soon as we return from the elections. But, again, ICE does go after – a majority of the time – some of the worst of the worst, and so we just don't know enough facts to really determine what really happened right here.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Post by Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) on X, September 21, 2026Complete post 2102015983841923143, 7:43 AM CDT (12:43:58 UTC)
Why we used this label

Relative to DHS's decision to have its own component lead the investigation into the shooting, Luna combines an argument that sanctuary-city policy, not ICE conduct, caused the shooting with a statement that she will personally ensure oversight and that too few facts are known to judge what happened. Those are materially different positions — excusing ICE's role while also reserving judgment and committing to accountability — which fits “Mixed or conditional”. The closest competing label, “Defended or excused”, loses because she does not conclude the shooting itself was justified; “Challenged the characterization” loses because she does not dispute a specific DHS description.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Florida 13th district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Anna Paulina Luna voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: Member of the House Oversight Committee, in posts on X

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said in House Report 119-831 that Leon Black willfully failed to comply with its June 26, 2026 deposition subpoena and document subpoena, and that his stated reasons for not complying are without merit.

“Leon Black is knowingly defying a congressional subpoena. This is CONTEMPT of Congress. ... A billionaire cannot sue his way out of a subpoena. You’ve been served, sir. Show up or be held in contempt.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Anna Paulina Luna on X: "Leon Black is knowingly defying a congressional subpoena. This is CONTEMPT of Congress." · Anna Paulina LunaPost, Sept. 3, 2026, 1:16 p.m. ET
Why we used this label

Relative to the decision to hold Black in contempt, Luna says Black's non-appearance is contempt of Congress and that he should show up or be held in contempt. She supports the action itself before the committee or the House had voted, so the label is a defense rather than a challenge to how it is described.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Florida's 13th district, answering a reporter in a Capitol hallway

Condemned

Statement summary

Asked about Laura Loomer's remarks, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna first said she had not seen them and could not comment. After the reporter named the women Loomer targeted, she said, "I honestly don't, uh, agree with those terms," as she walked away.

“I honestly don't, uh, agree with those terms.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Prem Thakker posts video asking House Republicans about Loomer's remarksVideo, 0:00-2:02
Why we used this label

The reference point is Laura Loomer's remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics. Luna first said she could not comment, but once told who the targets were she said she did not agree with the terms. That final answer is a brief but express rejection of the remarks, so we labeled it Condemned. Explicitly stayed out loses because she went on to give a view after her initial refusal. Mixed or conditional loses because her first answer was about not having seen the remarks, not a competing position. Evidence level: video of the exchange (0:55-0:59 of Thakker's video), with the speaker identified and the answer quoted by Raw Story.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Response to this claim

Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.

“Your comments are both sexist and misogynistic.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)White House tears into Ossoff after jab at key Trump aideQuoted reaction roundup
Why we used this label

Directly classifies the disputed phrasing as gendered misconduct.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: U.S. representative from Florida

Condemned

Statement summary

Luna said she was working on legislation to ban Flock cameras. The statement did not itself introduce a bill.

“I'm working on legislation to ban these.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Anna Paulina Luna statement on Flock ban legislationPost beginning I'm working on legislation to ban these
Why we used this label

She explicitly proposed a ban on the cameras, though no bill was introduced in the cited statement.

Portrait of Anna Paulina Luna

Anna Paulina Luna

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Florida at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Luna defends the strikes as within presidential authority and necessary to counter missiles and nuclear threats after negotiations failed.

“President Trump is operating within his Article 2 authorities,”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)CNN.com - Transcripts Transcript Providers Return to Transcripts main page CNN This Morning Iran Launches Retaliatory Strikes After Death Of Supreme Leader; Iranian President SaysCNN This Morning, March 1, 2026; full Luna interview, around 07:35 ET; rush transcript
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Luna defends the strikes as within presidential authority and necessary to counter missiles and nuclear threats after negotiations failed.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated