John Kennedy

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Neely Kennedy is the junior United States senator from Louisiana, in office since 2017. A Republican, he previously served as Louisiana state treasurer from 2000 to 2017 and sits on the Senate Appropriations, Banking, Budget, and Judiciary committees.

U.S. Senator (2017 to present)Also known as John Neely Kennedy, Sen. John KennedyWebsite (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented statements by John Kennedy on 2026 Midterm Elections, Artificial Intelligence, and Energy Policy, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 15 topics

Statements by John Kennedy

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Louisiana, speaking to Jewish Insider

Minimized

Statement summary

Kennedy said Republicans lost the midterms because Democrats did a better job of acknowledging voters' economic pain, and that the war, corruption and tariffs were among many reasons but not the main one.

“Republicans lost the midterms because the Democrats did a better job of acknowledging the economic pain of the American people, and everything flows from that ... People have a multitude of reasons for voting as they do ... but the overarching reason is what I just said, and I think once everybody has a chance to analyze the data, that's what they'll see.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)GOP senators skeptical of Vance's post-election analysis blaming Israel, Iran warFull article
Why we used this label

Kennedy lists the war among the reasons voters had but says the economy was the overarching reason, which downplays the war's role in the losses, so we labeled it as minimizing.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Louisiana, speaking to reporters at a campaign appearance in Michigan, as reported by The Hill

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. John Kennedy said he did not support importing diesel from Putin, whom he called a butcher of his own people and of Ukrainians, while saying the president is doing everything he can to get diesel prices down.

“support his decision to import it from Putin. Vladimir Putin is a butcher. He’s a butcher of his own people. And he’s a butcher of the good people of Ukraine.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)GOP lawmakers reject U.S.-Russia diesel deal, Trump's Zelensky commentsParagraphs quoting Sen. John Kennedy and former Rep. Mike Rogers, and the paragraphs on Fitzpatrick's bill.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the U.S. should ease sanctions on Russian diesel to lower fuel prices, as the administration did on October 9. The Hill reports that Kennedy does not "support his decision to import it from Putin" and calls Putin "a butcher". That opposes the Russian supply, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, since The Hill reports that he supported the president's decision and he says the president is "doing everything he can to get diesel prices down"; it loses because what he backs is the aim of lower prices, not the Russian diesel.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Louisiana and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

In his questioning of Smith, Sen. John Kennedy told Smith he had to know that seeking the phone records of senators violated the Speech or Debate Clause. He asked whether Smith told Chief Judge James Boasberg that the records were those of members of Congress, and suggested Smith did not because he knew the judge would not agree.

“Well, then you had to know it violated the speech and debate clause. In fact, when you went to Judge Boasberg, you didn't even tell him you were seeking the phone records of members of Congress, did you? Because you knew he wouldn't agree. He would say, hey, counselor, anybody who knows a law book from a J. Crew catalog knows that this violates the Constitution.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters (hearing video) · Senate Committee on the JudiciarySen. John Kennedy's questions to Smith on senators' phone records and nondisclosure orders, about 1:29:13 to 1:31:07 on the archived video timeline
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper. Kennedy told Smith he had to know that seeking the records violated the Speech or Debate Clause and suggested Smith withheld from the judge that the records were members'. That rejects the collection as improper, so we labeled it Condemned.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Louisiana

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Sen. John Kennedy defended U.S. and Israeli military action in Iran, saying it had made the world safer. He acknowledged higher gas prices and inflation but said he was proud of the American operation.

“No. 3, I just want to make this clear. We are going to look back 5 years from now and realize that what President Trump has done in Iran and what Israel has done in Iran has made the world immeasurably safer.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)John Kennedy speaks on the Iran war in the SenateSeptember 28, 2026, p. S5027, John Kennedy's remarks on Iran
Why we used this label

The case asks about support for the war in Iran. Kennedy argues that the military action was justified by improved security. His acknowledgment of higher costs does not change his defense, so we used Defended or excused.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Louisiana

Defended or excused

Statement summary

John Kennedy voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: United States senator from Louisiana

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Speaking to CBS News on September 23, 2026, Sen. John Kennedy said he and other Republican leaders want the Iran war to end, but he does not support Congress, in his words, pulling the rug out on President Trump by limiting his ability to strike Iran, particularly, he said, when the United States is winning. He called the genesis of most of that effort political and said it would hurt America, adding that everyone wants the war to end.

“I think the genesis of most, not all of that, but the genesis of most of that is political, and I think it would hurt America. Having said that, we all want the war to end.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)CBS News post on X quoting Sen. John Kennedy on the Iran war
Why we used this label

Kennedy said he wants the war to end but opposes congressional action to limit Trump's ability to strike Iran, defending the president's discretion to continue the campaign.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: United States senator from Louisiana, quoted in an ABC News report

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana attempted to fast-track legislation requiring every AI company to be able to deploy a kill switch to stop the technology if it gets out of control, arguing the measure is warranted if there is even a one per cent chance a model could cease to be a tool and become what he called an independent species. Fellow Republican Rand Paul blocked the attempt. The quoted line is as broadcast by ABC News and breaks off mid-sentence in the segment.

“If there is even a 1% chance that one of these AI models can shed its nature as a tool and become an independent species.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)ABC News: Geoffrey Hinton warns Congress it has about a year to control AI2:00 segment. 00:08-00:26: Hinton's warning, including the timeframe and the Chernobyl comparison. 00:26-00:34: his stated probability that AI eventually wipes out humanity. 00:50-01:15: Sen. John Kennedy's kill-switch bill. 01:15-01:25: Rand Paul blocking it. 01:25-01:35: the administration's position on existing liability. 01:35 onward: an unrelated item on Flock surveillance cameras.
Why we used this label

Kennedy supports it concretely, seeking to pass a federal mandate that AI companies be capable of shutting their systems down, and justifying it on a low-probability, high-consequence basis. That places him with Cantwell (728) and Hawley (798), who press for specific federal requirements, rather than with Huang (727) or Johnson (729). The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”; it loses because he attaches no condition to the requirement itself. Note that Kennedy questioned Kash Patel about FBI hiring standards in a separate case; this record concerns only his AI legislation.

Portrait of John Kennedy

John Kennedy

Role at the time: U.S. Senator (R-LA)

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. John Kennedy announced legislation requiring AI models to have a mandatory shutdown capability.

“It would say every AI model has to have a kill switch, so they can shut those puppies down if they start acting like the Terminator.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)John Kennedy Introducing Bill To Require "Kill Switch" On AI Models
Why we used this label

Kennedy's proposed mandatory "kill switch" legislation is a government-imposed safety intervention responding to AI risk, structurally similar to Bernie Sanders' already-documented bill announcement (classified condemns) elsewhere in this case.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Should Zohran Mamdani attend New York City’s 9/11 memorial?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Rudy Giuliani, George Pataki, and some September 11 victims’ relatives opposed Zohran Mamdani attending the 2026 memorial, citing his rhetoric and associations. Mamdani said he would honor victims; other elected officials and a family group said excluding the sitting mayor would politicize the commemoration.

IslamophobiaSeptember 11 AttacksUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated