Jason Smith

Portrait of Jason Smith
House Creative Services (Brian Thorpe)

Jason Smith is a U.S. representative from Missouri and chair of the House Ways and Means Committee.

What we have documented

We have documented 6 statements by Jason Smith, in 5 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Jason Smith

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Missouri's 8th District, posting on his @JasonSmithMO account

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Smith applauded the Eighth Circuit for reinstating the 2025 map, which he calls the Missouri First Map. He said changing the map in the middle of the election cycle "disenfranchises voters" and would send Missouri into a constitutional crisis, and he called any reversion "a blatant move by rogue liberal judges to subvert the will of the voters".

“I applaud the Eighth Circuit for reinstating the 2025 Missouri First Map. I’ve said it many times before, and I’ll say it again: changing the map in the middle of the election cycle disenfranchises voters and would send Missouri into a constitutional crisis. The voters voted for the 2025 map, and have already voted in primaries under it. Any reversion is a blatant move by rogue liberal judges to subvert the will of the voters.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Jason Smith on X: applauds the Eighth Circuit for reinstating the 2025 Missouri First Map · Jason SmithFull X post, published September 21, 2026 at 22:47 UTC (5:47 p.m. CDT)
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Smith welcomes the ruling that requires the 2025 map and says any reversion to the 2022 map would subvert the voters, which defends that use. The closest competing label, condemns, does not fit because his criticism is aimed at judges who would order a change and not at the use of the 2025 map.

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Missouri 8th district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Jason Smith voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: U.S. representative from Missouri and chair of the House Ways and Means Committee

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Bloomberg reported that Jason Smith supported the $5,000 proposal in principle while citing deficit concerns and the difficulty of passing legislation.

“It’s doable legislation doesn’t pass just like that.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Bloomberg reporting on congressional responses to Trump’s $5,000 proposalParagraphs quoting Thune, Smith, Burgum, Scalise, Cruz and Norman.
Why we used this label

Smith expressed support in principle while qualifying it with concerns about the legislative process and deficit constraints.

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: Chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means (Missouri's 8th District), in a committee press statement

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

USTR determined on June 2, 2026 that each of 60 economies' failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is unreasonable and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce, and on July 23, 2026, at the President's specific direction, imposed additional duties of 10% or 12.5% as the appropriate action under Section 301 to obtain the elimination of that practice.

“Holding accountable those countries that are not doing nearly enough to rid their supply chains of goods produced with forced labor is appropriate to address unfair trading practices that put American workers at a competitive disadvantage. But it is also absolutely necessary to combat this moral outrage.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Chairman Smith: Trump Administration is Fighting for American Workers and American Values (House Ways and Means Committee, July 23, 2026)Statement text, first paragraph after the introduction
Why we used this label

Relative to the Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, Smith calls the action appropriate and necessary, which defends it as justified. He addresses the policy and not the pending legal challenges. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he also says more should be done to hold trading partners accountable, but that is a call for more action rather than a condition on his support.

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Missouri at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Smith defends the Iran operation as making Americans safer after diplomatic efforts failed.

“I have confidence that every Missourian is safer and more secure today because of the President’s bold, decisive action.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Smith defends the Iran operation as making Americans safer after diplomatic efforts failed.Complete authored Weekly Capitol Report published March 6, including stated expectations about avoiding forever wars and American responsibility for Iran’s future.
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Smith defends the Iran operation as making Americans safer after diplomatic efforts failed.

Portrait of Jason Smith

Jason Smith

Role at the time: Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Asked on CNBC about Democratic demands in the fight over Department of Homeland Security funding, Smith, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said, "Why should you ban ICE from being at polling places? Because illegals aren't supposed to vote in this America".

“Why should you ban ICE from being at polling places? Because illegals aren't supposed to vote in this America.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Rep. Jason Smith on DHS funding: If Democrats don't like the rule of law, they need to change it · CNBCSquawk Box interview of Feb. 12, 2026; polling-place answer at about 6:05 to 6:30 of a 6:31 video
Why we used this label

The reference point is the administration's stated or threatened use of ICE and other armed federal agents at or near polling places in the 2026 election. Smith's rhetorical question argued that there is no reason to bar ICE from polling places because noncitizens are not supposed to vote. That defends allowing ICE at polling places, and he described no condition, so defends or excuses fits better than mixed or conditional.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage