Gary Peters

Portrait of Gary Peters
U.S. Senate Photographic Studio

United States Senator (Democratic) from Michigan.

What we have documented

We have documented 5 statements by Gary Peters, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Gary Peters

Portrait of Gary Peters

Gary Peters

Role at the time: U.S. senator and ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee; lead signatory

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Peters and other senators say a whistleblower alleged that DHS staff were told to impersonate voters on state portals. They call the alleged conduct alarming if true and demand an end to the initiative and further information.

“If true, this is just another alarming effort by the Department to use data that USCIS materials admit may be inaccurate”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senators' letter to DHS Secretary Mullin on election activities, September 25, 2026Pages 3-4, paragraphs on the Unlawful Voter Initiative and signatories
Why we used this label

The signed letter explicitly makes its negative judgment conditional on the whistleblower allegation being true.

Portrait of Gary Peters

Gary Peters

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Michigan

Condemned

Statement summary

Gary Peters voted yea on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Portrait of Gary Peters

Gary Peters

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Michigan

Condemned

Statement summary

Gary Peters voted YEA on H.Con.Res. 86, a vote to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran absent congressional authorization.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

The vote directs the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities Congress never authorized, which this tracker treats as opposition to the war's continuation.

Portrait of Gary Peters

Gary Peters

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Michigan; Ranking Member, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Peters said there was no evidence of the imminent threat that would justify the strikes on Iran, criticized Republican colleagues as 'a rubber stamp to the president,' and pressed the Defense Department for a clear strategy and exit plan, saying his constituents 'do not want to send their sons and daughters to war.'

“The president needs to protect us, and we want him or her to do that if there's an imminent threat. But that didn't occur here as far as we can see, there's no evidence.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Michigan lawmakers respond to US action in Iran
Why we used this label

Denies the war's stated justification (no imminent threat) and demands congressional oversight, a direct challenge to the war's legitimacy.

Portrait of Gary Peters

Gary Peters

Role at the time: U.S. senator and ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

Condemned

Statement summary

Peters argues that the D.C. deployment has consumed substantial resources without improving safety. He says keeping troops there without clear goals or an end date diverts resources from other security missions.

“Protecting public safety is essential, but this deployment has spent hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars without making our nation’s capital any safer,”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Peters and Kim criticize the D.C. National Guard deployment in a report releasePublished February 5, 2026; statements by Senators Peters and Kim
Why we used this label

The case concerns the D.C. National Guard policing deployment. Peters criticizes its effectiveness and resource costs, rather than defending the deployment merely because he supports public safety.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage