Derrick Van Orden

Portrait of Derrick Van Orden
Ike Hayman / U.S. House of Representatives

United States Representative and Republican candidate for U.S. House in Wisconsin's 3rd district.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Derrick Van Orden

Portrait of Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District and Republican candidate

Minimized

Statement summary

Van Orden tells the recipient to put the form in the circle file and carry on. His post quotes an account pointing to Cooke's cease-and-desist announcement.

“Please fill out the appropriate form and file it in the circle file. Carry on.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Derrick Van Orden dismisses Cooke's cease-and-desist demand · Derrick Van OrdenOriginal caption, September 30, 2026, 9:14 p.m. Eastern; quoted DVO Newsroom post points to Cooke's demand.
Why we used this label

He responds to the demand by telling the recipient to discard it, downplaying its significance.

Portrait of Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Wisconsin 3rd district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Derrick Van Orden voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

Role at the time: U.S. representative from Wisconsin, speaking in an interview with Newsmax

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In a Newsmax interview on September 2, Van Orden said of "the missile strikes against these drug boats" that "Those are saving Americans' lives", and that "More Americans have died from drug overdoses than all of the casualties from every war we have ever fought combined".

“the missile strikes against these drug boats. Well, guess what? Those are saving Americans' lives. More Americans have died from drug overdoses than all of the casualties from every war we have ever fought combined.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Aaron Rupar post of Rep. Derrick Van Orden's remarks on the drug boat strikes · Aaron RuparVideo clip of about 30 seconds, posted September 2, 2026 at 14:17 UTC
Why we used this label

Measured against the campaign the September 19 strike belongs to and the government's stated basis that those aboard are narcotraffickers, Van Orden defends the campaign of missile strikes on drug boats as saving American lives and cites overdose deaths as the reason. His defense rests on the effect of the campaign, not on evidence about any particular vessel.

Portrait of Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Wisconsin at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Van Orden defends Trump's military authority and criticizes congressional restrictions as weakening national security.

“President Trump acted fully within its constitutional authority and in accordance with the War Powers Resolution of 1973.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Van Orden: The Commander-in-Chief Must Retain the Ability to Act Decisively | Representative Derrick Van OrdenComplete original statement; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

The case asks about support for the war in Iran. Van Orden says Trump acted within his constitutional authority and the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and calls the House vote to restrict the President foolish and politically driven, so we used Defended or excused.

Topics in this coverage