Ritchie Torres

Portrait of Ritchie Torres
Photo by Ike Hayman / U.S. House Creative Services

Ritchie Torres is the U.S. representative for New York's 15th Congressional District, which covers the South Bronx and other parts of the Bronx. A Democrat, he was first elected to Congress in 2020 and previously served on the New York City Council.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Ritchie Torres on 2026 Midterm Elections, Government Transparency, and Immigration Policy, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 17 topics

Statements by Ritchie Torres

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for New York's 15th District, in a post on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Rep. Ritchie Torres, who represents the Bronx, said he is outraged by the shooting of a man in his car beside a 5-year-old child, called firing multiple rounds into a car with a child inside on a busy residential street abhorrent and indefensible, and said ICE has long operated as a rogue agency. He called on the DHS Inspector General to open an immediate and independent investigation and on ICE to release all footage of the shooting.

“I am outraged by the ICE shooting of a man in Marble Hill today as he sat in his car beside a 5-year-old child. Firing multiple rounds into a car with a child inside, on a busy residential street in the Bronx, is abhorrent and indefensible. It put an entire neighborhood in danger and left a man seriously injured. ICE has long operated as a rogue agency, and today's shooting is a chilling reminder of how little regard it has for the safety of New Yorkers.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Ritchie Torres's post on the ICE shooting in Marble Hill (X post)Full post, October 8, 9:16 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether the ICE officer was justified in shooting the man in the car. Torres says he is outraged and that firing multiple rounds into a car with a child inside is abhorrent and indefensible, which rejects the shooting as justified, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, which would fit a statement that withholds judgment pending an investigation; he states his conclusion and also asks for an investigation, so it loses.

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: U.S. Representative (D-NY)

Condemned

Statement summary

Ritchie Torres criticised Piker for condemning America while declining to criticise Mao Zedong, saying Piker has a rule against criticising him.

“Piker condemns America while refusing to condemn one of the 20th century's deadliest dictators, instead lionizing Mao as one of the world's 'great leaders.'”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Some Democrats Bash Hasan Piker (The Daily Signal)
Why we used this label

Piker's assertion that America commits more terrorism than al-Qaeda, Torres rejects it by attacking its consistency, arguing Piker applies condemnation to the United States but not to Mao. He disputes the standard behind the comparison rather than the death-toll arithmetic.

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, New York 15th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Ritchie Torres voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Response to this claim

Jebreal’s use of “monkey” and “errand boy” to describe Jeffries was racist anti-Black language regardless of her stated intent.

“Calling a Black man a “monkey” is racist. Full stop.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ritchie Torres response to Jebreal's remarksPost 2096052351530390010
Why we used this label

The statement directly and unequivocally classifies the language as racist.

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: U.S. representative for New York's 15th district, in a letter to the DHS inspector general

Condemned

Statement summary

Rep. Ritchie Torres told the DHS inspector general that ICE agents chasing people with firearms drawn is extremely dangerous and that the two Bronx incidents show callous tactics against American citizens and deep rot in the agency.

“ICE agents chasing people with firearms drawn without being harassed or attacked is extremely dangerous. These two incidents exemplify the callous tactics used by this Administration against American citizens and exposes the deep rot that has consumed the agency.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Rep. Ritchie Torres Demands Federal Investigation into Violent ICE Incidents in the BronxLetter to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari reproduced in the release
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether ICE agents falsified records and testimony to justify the arrests of Almonte and Concepcion. Torres calls the incidents examples of "the callous tactics used by this Administration against American citizens" and says they expose "the deep rot that has consumed the agency." That condemns the agents' conduct in the arrests, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, which would fit a request for an investigation alone; he states conclusions.

Portrait of Ritchie Torres

Ritchie Torres

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for New York at the statement date.

Condemned

Statement summary

Torres condemns the Iran war’s lack of congressional authorization and the expansion of presidential war powers.

“With respect to the war in Iran, authorization has neither been sought by the President nor granted by Congress.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Torres condemns the Iran war’s lack of congressional authorization and the expansion of presidential war powers.Complete official statement; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Torres condemns the Iran war’s lack of congressional authorization and the expansion of presidential war powers.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Were Rula Jebreal’s remarks about Hakeem Jeffries racist?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Rula Jebreal called Hakeem Jeffries a "bought and paid by AIPAC monkey" and an "errand boy" while denying racial intent, then apologized. The Congressional Black Caucus called the words racist; Wajahat Ali and Joy-Ann Reid stressed context but criticized the language.

RacismU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated