Josh Gottheimer

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

United States representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Josh Gottheimer on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and International Relations, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 15 topics

Statements by Josh Gottheimer

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district, posting on social media

Condemned

Statement summary

Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey condemned Piker's comparison on social media, saying it was not an accident but the product of what he called a brand built on anti-American hate. He cited Piker's 2019 remark that America deserved the September 11 attacks, a backdrop Gottheimer said featured a newspaper showing the Twin Towers, and what he described as years of excusing terrorists who targeted the United States. Gottheimer's characterisations of Piker's record and motives are his own.

“Comparing America to al-Qaeda wasn't an accident — Piker has built a brand on anti-American hate. This is a man who said America 'deserved' 9/11, who framed a newspaper with the Twin Towers on it for his backdrop, and who has spent years excusing the very terrorists who've targeted our country. That's not edgy commentary.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)The Hill: "Hasan Piker: US commits 'pound for pound' more terrorism than al Qaeda"
Why we used this label

Gottheimer rejects it outright and attributes it to a pattern rather than a slip, which is a direct condemnation of the claim and its author. He is the second Democrat recorded here to reject the comparison, after El-Sayed (956), and sits alongside Lara Trump (966) and Rogers (968). The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, on the basis that he disputes the framing of the remark as "edgy commentary"; it loses because that phrase rejects a defence of the claim rather than merely contesting a label, and the passage condemns the underlying comparison throughout.

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, New Jersey 5th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Josh Gottheimer voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district, posting on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Gottheimer said no version of calling a Black man a monkey and an errand boy is anything but racist, and said Jebreal owes House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries a real apology, not a half-hearted one.

“There is no version of calling a Black man a "monkey" and an "errand boy" that isn't racist. Rula Jebreal owes Leader Jeffries a real apology — not a half-hearted one dressed up with excuses.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Josh Gottheimer post on X about Rula Jebreal's remarks about Hakeem JeffriesPost 2096672530295877691
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Rula Jebreal's remarks about Hakeem Jeffries were racist. Gottheimer said there is no version of calling a Black man a "monkey" and an "errand boy" that is not racist, and said Jebreal owes Jeffries a real apology. That is an express judgment that the remarks were racist, so the label is Condemned.

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for New Jersey’s 5th congressional district

Condemned

Statement summary

Gottheimer characterized Piker’s remarks about American Jews as antisemitic and called for a House vote on a bipartisan resolution.

“Telling millions of followers that Jewish Americans are bringing violence on themselves is blatantly antisemitic and one of the oldest tropes in the book.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Gottheimer calls for House vote on resolution condemning Piker and Owens · Josh GottheimerQuoted statement beginning “Hatred is hatred, period.”
Why we used this label

In an official statement explicitly tied to Piker’s recent remarks about American Jews, Gottheimer calls the description of Jewish Americans “blatantly antisemitic.”

Portrait of Josh Gottheimer

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative; co-introducer of the resolution

Condemned

Statement summary

Gottheimer supports a congressional resolution condemning Piker's broader rhetoric; the linked resolution specifically cites the Hamas-over-Israel comparison.

“We cannot be selective in calling out antisemitism.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Gottheimer and Lawler introduce resolution condemning Piker’s rhetoric · Josh GottheimerGottheimer statement; release linking the introduced resolution. The resolution cites Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison among other statements.
Why we used this label

An official statement condemning Piker's rhetoric in a resolution that includes the comparison. The classification is not a claim that Gottheimer's quoted words addressed only this statement.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Were Rula Jebreal’s remarks about Hakeem Jeffries racist?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Rula Jebreal called Hakeem Jeffries a "bought and paid by AIPAC monkey" and an "errand boy" while denying racial intent, then apologized. The Congressional Black Caucus called the words racist; Wajahat Ali and Joy-Ann Reid stressed context but criticized the language.

RacismU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Hasan Piker said he preferred Hamas over Israel in a hypothetical, using lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau and the ADL rejected the comparison; Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes while maintaining that Israeli occupation was his overriding concern.

IsraelPolitical ViolenceUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated