Jared Huffman

Portrait of Jared Huffman
Ike Hayman / House Creative Services

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 2nd district.

Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 2nd Congressional District (2026)

What we have documented

We have documented 5 statements by Jared Huffman, in 4 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Jared Huffman

Portrait of Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Role at the time: U.S. Representative from California, posting on X

Condemned

Response to this claim

Doug Burgum stands to profit personally from the data center build-out he is promoting on public lands, through AI investments held in Arthur Ventures.

“Like every other goon in this administration, Data Center Doug is in it for himself. He wants to cover our public lands with AI data centers that will make him and Trump's tech buddies richer.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Jared Huffman's November 6, 2026 post on X about Doug Burgum and data centers on public landsFull post
Why we used this label

The reference point is Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's promotion of AI data centers on federally managed public lands while he holds tens of millions of dollars in AI investments through Arthur Ventures. Huffman says Burgum is pushing data centers on public lands to enrich himself, which condemns it.

Portrait of Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, California 2nd district

Condemned

Statement summary

Jared Huffman voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Role at the time: U.S. representative from California

Condemned

Statement summary

Huffman warns officials and contractors about proceeding without congressional authorization.

“They could be held personally liable.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Lawmakers Warn Trump Officials Not to Pursue Arch Project Without CongressInterview comments by Huffman and Interior spokesperson Katie Martin.
Why we used this label

He objects to the project and warns against carrying it out.

Portrait of Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Ranking Member, House Committee on Natural Resources

Condemned

Response to this claim

The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.

“The agreement with TotalEnergies is almost certainly unlawful. DOI and TotalEnergies refer to a "settlement," indicating the administration may fund this payout through the Judgment Fund.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin to Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche · Jared Huffman
Why we used this label

Huffman directly labels the settlement unlawful and links its "settlement" framing to a likely Judgment Fund funding source he disputes as improper, a clear condemnation of the payment's legal basis.

Portrait of Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

Role at the time: United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 2nd district.

Condemned

Statement summary

Huffman explicitly opposes starting the war and supports congressional action to rein in unauthorized hostilities.

“I unequivocally oppose Trump’s rash, illegal decision to start a war against Iran”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Rep. Huffman Statement on Vote to Rein in Trump’s Illegal, Costly War in Iran | U.S. Congressman Jared HuffmanComplete original text; Huffman explicitly opposes starting the Iran war
Why we used this label

The case concerns U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war. Huffman explicitly opposes starting the war and supports congressional action to rein in unauthorized hostilities.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

ProPublica reports Burgum holds up to $64.4 million in AI companies while pushing data centers on public lands; Interior calls suggestions of a conflict false

Relationship to this case: Speaker

ProPublica and Save Our Parks report that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum holds up to $64.4 million in AI companies through Arthur Ventures while promoting data centers on public lands. Interior says suggestions his decisions follow his investments are false.

Government EthicsPublic LandsUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage