Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Interior paid TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind more than $2.3 billion to cancel offshore wind leases in 2026. State attorneys general and members of Congress say the payments broke the Judgment Fund Act. Interior says the payments were lawful, voluntary refunds.
Claim in dispute
The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.
Case period:
Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated
Overview
This case classifies responses to one specific question: whether the payments the Department of the Interior and the Department of Justice made to TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind to cancel their offshore wind leases complied with the Judgment Fund Act, 31 U.S.C. 1304, a permanent appropriation that Congress limited to paying final court judgments and Justice Department compromise settlements of claims that were being litigated or could have been litigated against the United States. The case does not classify responses to the government's broader authority to cancel offshore wind leases, the separate stop-work orders and injunctions covered in other cases, or the general policy dispute over offshore wind. It also does not resolve the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, National Environmental Policy Act, or Administrative Procedure Act claims raised in the same lawsuits; those are distinct legal theories from the Judgment Fund question.
On March 23, 2026 (opens in a new tab), Interior announced it would cancel two TotalEnergies leases, in the New York Bight and Carolina Long Bay, and pay the company's U.S. subsidiary, Attentive Energy, $928 million combined, the amount the company had paid for the leases in 2022. On April 27, 2026 (opens in a new tab), Interior announced the same arrangement with Bluepoint Wind ($765 million, for its New York Bight lease) and Golden State Wind ($120 million, for its Morro Bay, California lease). On June 17, 2026, Interior announced a further agreement with Invenergy to cancel four leases, in the New York Bight, the Gulf of Maine, and off California, for a combined $765 million.
Seven states led by New York's attorney general, Letitia James, sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 2, 2026 (opens in a new tab) over the TotalEnergies payment. Delaware later joined the coalition, bringing it to eight states, and they sued again on September 22, 2026 in the Eastern District of New York (opens in a new tab) over the Bluepoint Wind payment and in the District of Maine (opens in a new tab) over the Invenergy payment. California's attorney general, Rob Bonta, separately sued over Invenergy's California lease payment. All four complaints make the same core argument: that the payments were not compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation, and that compensation for a canceled lease is a type of payment "otherwise provided for" under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, so the Judgment Fund was not legally available.
Interior has said the deals were voluntary agreements, reviewed and approved by the Department of Justice, and that the companies were simply refunded money they had already paid the Treasury. TotalEnergies' chief executive, Patrick Pouyanne, made the same argument to CNBC. Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said the settlements resolved "protracted litigation."
People in this case
Doug BurgumDirectly involved
Rob BontaCommented
Letitia JamesCommented
Deborah RossCommented
Timeline
9 timeline entries on this page. Dates: March 23, 2026 to September 22, 2026
March 2026
1 event
Interior announces $928 million TotalEnergies settlement
Incident
The Department of the Interior announced an agreement with TotalEnergies to cancel its New York Bight and Carolina Long Bay offshore wind leases and pay the company's U.S. subsidiary, Attentive Energy, $928 million combined, the amount it had paid for the leases in 2022.
[01]Interior and TotalEnergies Agree to End Offshore Wind Projects, Lowering Costs for American Families
Department of the Interior press release announcing the settlement agreement to cancel TotalEnergies' two offshore wind leases and reimburse the company $928 million combined.
Interior and TotalEnergies Agree to End Offshore Wind Projects, Lowering Costs for American Families · U.S. Department of the Interior
14 days between recorded events
April 2026
3 events
House Democrats question TotalEnergies settlement's legal basis
Reaction
Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin, ranking members of the Natural Resources and Judiciary committees, wrote to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the acting Attorney General calling the TotalEnergies settlement unlawful and demanding its statutory basis.
[02]Letter from Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin to Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
Letter from the ranking members of the House Natural Resources and Judiciary committees questioning the legal basis for the TotalEnergies settlement.
Whitehouse opens Senate investigation into TotalEnergies payment
Reaction
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, sent TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne a letter opening an investigation into the settlement, citing GAO and Justice Department precedent on the limits of the Judgment Fund.
[03]Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne
Letter from the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee opening an investigation into the TotalEnergies settlement's compliance with the Judgment Fund Act.
Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne · Sheldon WhitehouseInterior announces Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind settlements
Incident
The Department of the Interior announced agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's New York Bight lease for $765 million and Golden State Wind's Morro Bay, California lease for $120 million, following the same model as the TotalEnergies settlement.
[04]Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States
Department of the Interior press release announcing settlement agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's and Golden State Wind's offshore wind leases, with quotes from Secretary Burgum and Associate Attorney General Woodward.
Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States · U.S. Department of the Interior
31 days between recorded events
May 2026
1 event
15 House Democrats demand records from Trump administration
Reaction
Fifteen House Democrats led by Rep. Deborah Ross sent a letter to President Trump, the Attorney General, and the Interior Department Inspector General demanding records on the offshore wind settlements and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.
[05]Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz
Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.
June 2026
2 events
Seven states sue over the TotalEnergies settlement
Reaction
Seven states led by New York filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing the TotalEnergies settlement violated the Judgment Fund Act because it did not resolve actual or imminent litigation and paid for compensation otherwise available under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
[06]State of New York et al. v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-01910)
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the TotalEnergies settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act and other federal laws.
Interior announces $765 million Invenergy settlement
Incident
The Department of the Interior announced a settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases, in the New York Bight, the Gulf of Maine, and off California, for a combined $765 million, which Invenergy agreed to redirect into natural gas and geothermal projects.
[07]DOI settlement redirects $765 million from offshore wind to gas, geothermal projects
World Oil report on Interior's settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases for a combined $765 million.
72 days between recorded events
August 2026
1 event
California sues over the Golden State Wind settlement
Reaction
California filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act, the Antideficiency Act, and other federal laws.
[08]State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-09123)
Federal court complaint filed by California challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout and its funding from the Judgment Fund.
25 days between recorded events
September 2026
1 event
States file three more Judgment Fund lawsuits over Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy
Reaction
Eight states filed suit in the Eastern District of New York over the Bluepoint Wind settlement and in the District of Maine over Invenergy's multistate leases, while California separately sued over Invenergy's California lease; the states said the administration had by then committed more than $4 billion in Judgment Fund payments to cancel offshore wind leases.
[09]State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (E.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-05851)
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Bluepoint Wind settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act; recites the broader pattern of offshore wind lease buyouts and the more than $4 billion total.
State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (E.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-05851) · Letitia Jamesparagraphs 11-20, 450[10]State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D. Maine No. 2:26-cv-00453)
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Invenergy settlement covering three offshore wind leases as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act.
State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D. Maine No. 2:26-cv-00453) · Letitia Jamesparagraphs 1-4, 137-142[11]State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 4:26-cv-10778)
Federal court complaint filed by California challenging Invenergy's California lease buyout; also recites the August 28, 2026 California lawsuit over the Golden State Wind buyout and the total Judgment Fund spending across the settlements.
Claims
Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.
What's disputed
Disputed claim
The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.
Sources (2)
- State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (E.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-05851) · Letitia Jamesparagraphs 11-20, 450
Disputed claim
The payment TotalEnergies is receiving is not taxpayer money but the return of funds the company itself paid to the Treasury for its leases in 2022.
Sources (1)
Disputed claim
The lease buyout payments are a dollar-for-dollar refund of money the companies already paid the Treasury, not new taxpayer spending, because the leases were no longer viable without government-favored terms.
Sources (2)
- Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States · U.S. Department of the Interior
Response record
Responses
Latest recorded positions: 8. Dates: March 24, 2026 to September 22, 2026
Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.
8 responses on this page
Rob Bonta"President Trump is trying to send $111 million to his fossil fuel industry friends and wants taxpayers and working families to cover the tab."
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)During Climate Week, Attorney General Bonta Announces Second Lawsuit Challenging Unlawful Trump Administration Offshore Wind Deal · Rob BontaCondemnedCase context: Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Read more
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, announcing a lawsuit over Invenergy's canceled California lease, said the administration was directing taxpayer money to fossil fuel interests and asking working families to pay for it.
Role at the time: Attorney General of California
Before the statement
Bonta and the California Energy Commission filed suit against the Invenergy California lease buyout, arguing it violated the Judgment Fund Act along with other federal laws.
After the statement
Bonta said California was "not here to foot the bill" and asked the court to strike down the deal as unlawful.
Why this label?
Bonta directly criticizes the payment as an abuse of taxpayer dollars benefiting fossil fuel interests, condemning both the payment and its intended use.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Letitia James"These illegal backroom deals take money that should have gone toward lowering New Yorkers' bills and hand it to fossil fuel projects in other states, all while our energy demand continues to grow."
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Attorney General James and Governor Hochul Announce Lawsuit Challenging Trump Administration's Illegal Offshore Wind Deals · Letitia JamesCondemnedResponding to: The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.
Read more
New York Attorney General Letitia James said the Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy settlement payments divert money that should lower New Yorkers' energy bills to fossil fuel projects elsewhere, as she announced two lawsuits challenging the payments.
Role at the time: Attorney General of New York
Before the statement
James spoke as she and Governor Kathy Hochul announced New York was leading a coalition of eight states in two new lawsuits challenging the Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy settlement payments.
After the statement
James said her office would continue litigating to have the settlements struck down.
Why this label?
James directly rejects the payments as "illegal backroom deals", condemning both the legality and the effect of the Judgment Fund payments to Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Deborah Ross"The use of congressionally appropriated funds, potentially in violation of the Antideficiency Act, to pay private companies to cancel clean energy projects on the condition that they invest in fossil fuel ventures appears to be quid pro quo. ... You have furnished these reimbursements through the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Judgment Fund, which was created to pay valid judgement and settlements where the United States is the defendant. The details of these agreements make clear that your payment structure does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund: DOI has identified no final judgment, Attorney General-approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make this payment eligible for the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. § 1304 or 28 U.S.C. § 2414."
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz · Deborah RossCondemnedCase context: Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Read more
Rep. Deborah Ross, leading a letter from 15 House Democrats to President Trump, the Attorney General, and the Interior Department Inspector General, wrote that the payment structure "does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund" because DOI identified no final judgment, approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make the payments eligible under 31 U.S.C. Section 1304.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative, North Carolina
Before the statement
Ross's letter followed the TotalEnergies and Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind settlement announcements and cited the Antideficiency Act alongside the Judgment Fund.
After the statement
Ross and her co-signers asked the recipients to answer 16 questions about the negotiations by June 1, 2026, including whether the administration obtained a written fiscal-law opinion before entering the agreements.
Why this label?
Relative to whether the payments complied with the Judgment Fund Act, Ross's letter argues directly that they do not meet the statute's requirements, identifying no final judgment or approved compromise that would make them eligible. That is a direct condemnation of the payment mechanism, not merely the broader cancellation policy.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Doug BurgumDirectly involved"They essentially gave the U.S. government an interest-free loan and their money was refunded to them"
Open source (opens in a new tab)New York, 6 other states sue over the Trump administration's deal to end an offshore wind project · PBS NewsHourDefended or excusedResponding to: The lease buyout payments are a dollar-for-dollar refund of money the companies already paid the Treasury, not new taxpayer spending, because the leases were no longer viable without government-favored terms.
Read more
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told the House Natural Resources Committee that TotalEnergies was simply refunded money it had already paid the government for its offshore wind leases, comparing the arrangement to an interest-free loan.
Role at the time: U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Before the statement
Rep. Dave Min asked Burgum whether it was appropriate for Interior to send $1 billion to a foreign energy company to stop producing energy while Americans face high utility bills.
After the statement
Min responded that the cancellation was a case study in what he called an economically illiterate and unlawful energy strategy.
Why this label?
Burgum argues the payment was a legitimate refund of the company's own money rather than new taxpayer spending, defending the payment's basis against Rep. Dave Min's questioning.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Stanley Woodward "protracted litigation benefits neither, and I am proud to have helped facilitate today's historic deals that advance the President's Energy Dominance Agenda"
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States · U.S. Department of the InteriorDefended or excusedCase context: Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Read more
Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said the Justice Department worked with Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind to reach settlements rather than continue what he described as protracted litigation.
Role at the time: Associate Attorney General of the United States
Before the statement
Woodward spoke as Interior announced settlement agreements with Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind on the same terms as the earlier TotalEnergies deal.
After the statement
Woodward added that under the agreements, American taxpayers would be the beneficiary rather than a source of continued subsidies for the projects.
Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States · U.S. Department of the InteriorWhy this label?
Woodward frames the settlements as the product of a legitimate litigation dispute the Justice Department resolved, defending the settlement process against claims that no real dispute existed to settle.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sheldon Whitehouse"it is black letter law that the government may not use the Fund to pay Total"
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne · Sheldon WhitehouseCondemnedCase context: Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Read more
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, in a letter opening a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee investigation, cited Justice Department and GAO precedent to argue the Judgment Fund was not legally available to pay TotalEnergies because there was no imminent litigation to settle.
Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Ranking Member, Committee on Environment and Public Works
Before the statement
Whitehouse wrote to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne seeking documents and answers about the negotiation of the settlement and the source of the funds used to pay the company.
After the statement
Whitehouse asked TotalEnergies to confirm by April 23, 2026 whether the Treasury Secretary had certified the payment as required by statute.
Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne · Sheldon WhitehouseWhy this label?
Whitehouse concludes the payment was legally unavailable under the Judgment Fund Act, applying GAO and DOJ Office of Legal Counsel precedent to the facts of the TotalEnergies deal and rejecting its legality.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Show fewer responses
Jared Huffman"The agreement with TotalEnergies is almost certainly unlawful. DOI and TotalEnergies refer to a "settlement," indicating the administration may fund this payout through the Judgment Fund."
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin to Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche · Jared HuffmanCondemnedResponding to: The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.
Read more
Rep. Jared Huffman and Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking members of the Natural Resources and Judiciary committees, wrote to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the acting Attorney General calling the TotalEnergies settlement unlawful and asking what statutory authority permitted the payment.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Ranking Member, House Committee on Natural Resources
Before the statement
The letter followed Interior's March 23, 2026 announcement that it would pay TotalEnergies nearly $1 billion to cancel its offshore wind leases.
After the statement
Huffman and Raskin asked Interior and the Justice Department to answer eight questions, including which accounts the $928 million would be drawn from, by April 20, 2026.
Why this label?
Huffman directly labels the settlement unlawful and links its "settlement" framing to a likely Judgment Fund funding source he disputes as improper, a clear condemnation of the payment's legal basis.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Patrick Pouyanne "my money that I gave in '22 to the Treasury, which is coming back"
Open source (opens in a new tab)Trump's $1B offshore wind payout to TotalEnergies sparks legal concerns · Canary MediaDefended or excusedResponding to: The payment TotalEnergies is receiving is not taxpayer money but the return of funds the company itself paid to the Treasury for its leases in 2022.
Read more
TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne told CNBC the payment his company is receiving is not taxpayer money but the return of what TotalEnergies itself paid the Treasury for the leases in 2022.
Role at the time: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, TotalEnergies
Before the statement
Pouyanne spoke to CNBC at the CERAWeek energy conference in Houston, days after Interior announced the settlement agreement.
After the statement
A former BOEM director, Elizabeth Klein, disputed the characterization, saying the lease payments became federal funds once TotalEnergies won the leases.
Why this label?
Pouyanne defends the payment's legitimacy by characterizing it as the return of the company's own funds rather than an improper use of public money, directly addressing the taxpayer-cost objection at the center of the Judgment Fund dispute.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sources
(15)
Original text
State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (E.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-05851)
Relevant passage: paragraphs 11-20, 450
About this source
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Bluepoint Wind settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act; recites the broader pattern of offshore wind lease buyouts and the more than $4 billion total.
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-09123)
Relevant passage: paragraphs 8-11
About this source
Federal court complaint filed by California challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout and its funding from the Judgment Fund.
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
DOI settlement redirects $765 million from offshore wind to gas, geothermal projects
About this source
World Oil report on Interior's settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases for a combined $765 million.
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Trump's $1B offshore wind payout to TotalEnergies sparks legal concerns
About this source
Canary Media report on legal questions surrounding the TotalEnergies settlement, including CEO Patrick Pouyanne's CNBC remarks and a former BOEM director's rebuttal.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
During Climate Week, Attorney General Bonta Announces Second Lawsuit Challenging Unlawful Trump Administration Offshore Wind Deal
About this source
California Attorney General's press release announcing the lawsuit over Invenergy's California lease buyout.
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
New York, 6 other states sue over the Trump administration's deal to end an offshore wind project
About this source
PBS News report on the first lawsuit over the TotalEnergies settlement, including Interior's response and Secretary Burgum's May 13, 2026 House testimony about the payment.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Attorney General James and Governor Hochul Announce Lawsuit Challenging Trump Administration's Illegal Offshore Wind Deals
About this source
New York Attorney General's press release announcing the lawsuits over the Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy settlement payments.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Letter from Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin to Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
About this source
Letter from the ranking members of the House Natural Resources and Judiciary committees questioning the legal basis for the TotalEnergies settlement.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz
About this source
Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne
About this source
Letter from the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee opening an investigation into the TotalEnergies settlement's compliance with the Judgment Fund Act.
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 4:26-cv-10778)
Relevant passage: paragraphs 107-121
About this source
Federal court complaint filed by California challenging Invenergy's California lease buyout; also recites the August 28, 2026 California lawsuit over the Golden State Wind buyout and the total Judgment Fund spending across the settlements.
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D. Maine No. 2:26-cv-00453)
Relevant passage: paragraphs 1-4, 137-142
About this source
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Invenergy settlement covering three offshore wind leases as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act.
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
State of New York et al. v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-01910)
Relevant passage: paragraphs 1-20
About this source
Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the TotalEnergies settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act and other federal laws.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States
About this source
Department of the Interior press release announcing settlement agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's and Golden State Wind's offshore wind leases, with quotes from Secretary Burgum and Associate Attorney General Woodward.
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Interior and TotalEnergies Agree to End Offshore Wind Projects, Lowering Costs for American Families
About this source
Department of the Interior press release announcing the settlement agreement to cancel TotalEnergies' two offshore wind leases and reimburse the company $928 million combined.
- Published
- Accessed