Ilhan Omar

Portrait of Ilhan Omar
U.S. House Office of Photography

Ilhan Omar is a Democratic U.S. representative for Minnesota's 5th Congressional District, serving since January 2019. Born in Somalia, she previously served in the Minnesota House of Representatives and worked as a policy aide for the Minneapolis City Council.

What we have documented

We have documented statements by Ilhan Omar on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Government Transparency, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Case updates

Want updates on officials' fraud claim about Ilhan Omar?

Get an email if DHS or the Justice Department confirms or acts on the investigation officials describe, or when Omar and administration officials speak again.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 15 topics

Statements by Ilhan Omar

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th District

Condemned

Statement summary

Omar said Trump reaches for her name whenever the news turns bad and said her name has always been Ilhan Omar.

“Whenever the news turns bad, this creep reaches for one name: mine. So let’s make it crystal clear. My name has always been Ilhan Omar.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Ilhan Omar on X: "My name has always been Ilhan Omar"Post on the verified @IlhanMN X account, October 23, 2026, 1:06 p.m. EDT; full post.
Why we used this label

Omar rejects Trump's fraud and false-name accusation and calls such claims conspiracy theories, condemning the public accusation this case scrutinizes.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Minnesota's 5th District

Condemned

Statement summary

Omar rejects Trump's statement that the matter is up to the Justice Department. She says the department that once found her citizenship solid now says something is wrong, which she says shows the investigation is political.

“Oh, absolutely not. I mean, he's got everything to do with it. ... And so for them to say that my status as a citizen in this country was solid, and then to have that same department now saying there's something wrong, tells you how political this whole investigation is.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)MS NOW publishes Chris Hayes's full interview with Ilhan Omar after the search of her home · MS NOW21:35 to 22:55
Why we used this label

Relative to the search of her home and the investigation behind it, Omar calls the investigation political and says Trump is directing it. That is a condemnation.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. representative, through her campaign's supplied statement

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

Appearing with Hasan Piker at the Minnesota event is justified as a way to mobilize young voters.

“Early voting among people under 40 is down, and we need to do everything to get young people to the polls. The Congresswoman knows the Democratic Party is a Big Tent party, and she’s excited to join Senator Omar Fateh’s event to mobilize young voters and get them to vote in this critical midterm election.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Omar campaign defends the Minnesota Piker eventCampaign response and event announcement
Why we used this label

The subject is the decision to invite and appear with Piker at the October 26 Minnesota event. Omar's campaign defends joining the Piker event as a way to mobilize younger voters.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th District, through a letter from attorneys Amy Jeffress and Joshua Matz to federal prosecutors

Condemned

Statement summary

In a letter to the prosecutors handling the investigation, Omar's attorneys said the investigation is politically motivated, violates Omar's constitutional rights and threatens the separation of powers, and that the search of Omar's home was neither justified nor lawful.

“This vindictive, retributive, and politically motivated criminal investigation into one of the President’s chief congressional critics violates Representative Omar’s constitutional rights and threatens the separation of powers”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Rep. Ilhan Omar's attorneys demand return of property seized in federal search of her home · Associated PressFull article (Associated Press story as published by ABC News)
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether the federal search of Omar's home was politically motivated, as Omar and Democratic leaders allege. Omar's lawyers call the investigation "vindictive, retributive, and politically motivated" and say it violates Omar's constitutional rights, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Challenged characterization, since the letter also disputes the immigration allegations; it loses because the letter directly attacks the investigation and calls the search unlawful.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th District, through spokesperson Jacklyn Rogers

Condemned

Statement summary

Responding to reports that the investigation aims to revoke Rep. Ilhan Omar's citizenship, her spokesperson Jacklyn Rogers told USA Today that it "isn't a legitimate law enforcement action" and called it "an authoritarian move to silence an opponent right before an election".

“This isn't a legitimate law enforcement action,” … “It is an authoritarian move to silence an opponent right before an election where he and his party will be rejected by Americans in historic proportions.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)USA Today report that the federal probe of Omar is aimed at revoking her citizenship · USA Today
Why we used this label

Omar's office rejects the investigation and the push to revoke her citizenship as illegitimate and politically motivated. That condemns the accusation and its pursuit.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th District

Condemned

Statement summary

Omar says the search of her home is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement.

“I’m ok. Make no mistake: this is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement”
Open source (opens in a new tab)DHS agents search Rep. Ilhan Omar's home · PoliticoFull article
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether the federal search of Omar's home was politically motivated, as Omar and Democratic leaders allege. Omar calls the search "an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement", so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Challenged characterization, since she disputes how the investigation is presented; it loses because she directly denounces the search itself.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Minnesota's 5th District, on the congressional office's X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Omar said Flock cameras track people's every move and raise serious civil rights concerns, warned that Big Tech is pushing the country toward an AI surveillance state, and called for banning Flock.

“Flock cameras track your every move. It’s creepy, dangerous, and raises serious civil rights concerns. Big Tech is pushing us toward an AI surveillance state. Americans deserve privacy, not unchecked surveillance. Ban Flock NOW.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Ilhan Omar's X post calling to ban Flock cameras · Ilhan OmarOriginal post, October 5, 2026 at 4:54 p.m. Eastern
Why we used this label

Relative to whether networked license-plate surveillance should exist, Omar calls Flock cameras creepy and dangerous and writes "Ban Flock NOW", so we labeled it Condemned. On the remedy ladder this is Ban or remove, the strongest step the post names.

Portrait of Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, answering questions from Fox News Digital reporter Nicholas Ballasy

Condemned

Statement summary

Asked by Fox News Digital’s Nicholas Ballasy for a response to statements by DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Tom Homan that, in his words, she “allegedly violated immigration law” and is “under criminal investigation,” Rep. Ilhan Omar suggested he ask them what information they have. Asked whether DHS had reached out to her formally or sent her any letters, she said no, and said no again when Ballasy asked “Not at all?” Asked about the allegation that she married her brother, she said “the right wing has always had this shit going, so I don’t really worry about it,” and closed the exchange with “You have a good day.”

“Why don’t you follow up with them and ask them what is the information that they have” … “The right wing has always had this shit going, so I don’t really worry about it. You have a good day.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Nicholas Ballasy's video of Rep. Ilhan Omar answering his questions about the DHS investigation00:00–00:41 (Ballasy’s questions and Omar’s answers).
Why we used this label

Omar answers the officials’ claims by telling the reporter to ask them what information they have, by saying DHS has not contacted her, and by dismissing the marriage allegation as something the right wing “has always had this shit going.” That criticizes the accusation as a recurring partisan attack, though she does not address in this exchange whether it is true. The closest competing labels are “Challenged the characterization”, because she questions the officials’ information and says she has not been contacted, and minimizes, because she says she does not “really worry about it.” They lose because she goes beyond disputing a description by characterizing the accusation itself as something the right wing “has always had this shit going,” and she concedes no concern to downplay. Ending the exchange does not make it “Explicitly stayed out”, because she answered each question first.

Older statements

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated