Was Florida right to remove license-plate readers from state highway rights-of-way?

Florida revoked permits for plate readers on state highway rights-of-way, citing privacy and misuse concerns. Flock Safety urged regulation instead of removal, while Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner warned that the short deadline could harm criminal investigations.

Claim in dispute

Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Florida Department of TransportationFlock SafetySteven Meiner

Overview

FDOT's August 31 memorandum revoked existing general-use permits for readers installed by local law-enforcement agencies in State Highway System rights-of-way. It gave permit holders 30 days to remove affected devices and stopped new approvals in that jurisdiction. The order did not ban every plate reader in Florida and was not limited to Flock products. Flock argued for regulation instead of removal. Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner acknowledged privacy concerns but said the order's scope and deadline could impair crime investigations. The wider debate over whether networked plate-reader surveillance should exist is tracked separately.

Timeline

2 timeline entries on this page. Dates: August 31, 2026 to September 1, 2026

  1. August 2026

    1 event

    1. FDOT revokes state-road plate-reader permits

      Source release

      FDOT issued a memorandum revoking local-agency permits for plate readers in State Highway System rights-of-way and requiring removal within 30 days.

      [01]Engineering and Operations Memorandum 26-01: Revocation of General Use Permits for Automated License Plate Readers

      Florida's August 31 memorandum revokes permits issued to local law-enforcement agencies for plate readers in State Highway System rights-of-way, requires removal within 30 days and stops new approvals in that jurisdiction.

  2. September 2026

    1 event

    1. Mayor Meiner objects to rapid removal

      Reaction

      Meiner told WLRN that the order could harm public safety in Miami Beach while acknowledging concerns about privacy.

      [02]Miami Beach mayor denounces statewide ban on automatic license plate readers

      WLRN's interview with Mayor Steven Meiner about the state-road plate-reader order and its possible effect on public safety in Miami Beach. The headline calls it a statewide ban, but the order applies to state-highway rights-of-way.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 7. Dates: August 31, 2026 to September 2, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

3 responses on this page

  1. Electronic Frontier Foundation
    "good steps forward, but we are still far from the finish line"
    Open source (opens in a new tab)EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions · Electronic Frontier FoundationFlorida order discussion and final paragraph
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

    Read more

    EFF welcomed Florida's removal of readers from state-highway rights-of-way while noting that cameras on local roads and private property remain.

    Role at the time: Digital-rights advocacy organization

    Before the statement

    EFF reviewed the Florida order alongside a separate Texas funding directive.

    After the statement

    It said the Florida order does not reach readers outside state-highway rights-of-way.

    EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions · Electronic Frontier FoundationFlorida order discussion and final paragraph

    Why this label?

    The FDOT removal is at issue. EFF endorses that measure and calls for further restrictions rather than criticizing the removal.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Zach Schira
    "I think there's still some real questions about what is going on behind the scenes"
    Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removalZach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

    Read more

    Zach Schira supported Florida's removal of plate readers from state roads as a step forward but said cameras on other roads remain a concern.

    Role at the time: DeFlock St. Pete organizer

    Before the statement

    WUSF reported Schira's view of FDOT's August 31 order and interviewed him about its limits.

    After the statement

    He noted that county and city roads remain outside the state-right-of-way order.

    WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removalZach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting

    Why this label?

    The FDOT removal is the measure at issue. Schira approves of that step while arguing it does not go far enough.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Florida Department of TransportationDirectly involved
    "concerning reports of misuse, data privacy concerns, and surveillance schemes"
    Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Engineering and Operations Memorandum 26-01: Revocation of General Use Permits for Automated License Plate Readers · Florida Department of Transportation
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

    Read more

    FDOT cited the growth of roadside readers and reports of misuse and surveillance as reasons to revoke local-agency permits in its jurisdiction.

    Role at the time: State transportation agency

    Before the statement

    FDOT issued Engineering and Operations Memorandum 26-01 to local-agency permit holders.

    After the statement

    The directive applied to State Highway System rights-of-way and gave permit holders 30 days to remove affected readers.

    Why this label?

    The memo gives reasons for FDOT's permit revocation, the measure at issue in this case.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(7)

Original text

Engineering and Operations Memorandum 26-01: Revocation of General Use Permits for Automated License Plate Readers

About this source

Florida's August 31 memorandum revokes permits issued to local law-enforcement agencies for plate readers in State Highway System rights-of-way, requires removal within 30 days and stops new approvals in that jurisdiction.

Author
Will Watts, Florida Department of Transportation
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions

EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions (opens in a new tab) · Electronic Frontier FoundationFlorida order discussion and final paragraph
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Florida order discussion and final paragraph

About this source

EFF welcomes Florida's state-highway rights-of-way removal but says the policy does not reach cameras on other roads or private property.

Author
Rindala Alajaji and Adam Schwartz
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Sheriff Eric Aden statement on Flock cameras

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Sheriff Aden quotes and removal plan

About this source

Aden says the FDOT order is disappointing for public safety while confirming his office will remove cameras and await clearer legal guidance.

Published
Accessed

Official statement

Cocoa Beach Police Department statement on Flock ALPR cameras

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs 1-4

About this source

The department describes the investigative cost of Florida's state-road removal order and acknowledges privacy concerns about continuous tracking.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removal

WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removal (opens in a new tab)Zach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Zach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting

About this source

Schira calls the state-road removal a step in the right direction but says cameras remain on county and city roads.

Author
Nancy Guan
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Florida revokes all permits for Flock cameras on state roads

About this source

News 6 reporting on the FDOT memo includes Flock Safety's direct response to the order. The article was updated September 1.

Author
Anthony Talcott and Nick Neville
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

Miami Beach mayor denounces statewide ban on automatic license plate readers

About this source

WLRN's interview with Mayor Steven Meiner about the state-road plate-reader order and its possible effect on public safety in Miami Beach. The headline calls it a statewide ban, but the order applies to state-highway rights-of-way.

Author
Joshua Ceballos
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.