Schira calls Florida removal a step forward

DeFlock St. Pete organizer

“I think there's still some real questions about what is going on behind the scenes”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removalZach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting

Source and context

Interview

WUSF interviews Zach Schira on Florida camera removal (opens in a new tab)Zach Schira interview before How law enforcement agencies are reacting

About this source

Schira calls the state-road removal a step in the right direction but says cameras remain on county and city roads.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

WUSF reported Schira's view of FDOT's August 31 order and interviewed him about its limits.

After the quotation

He noted that county and city roads remain outside the state-right-of-way order.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The FDOT removal is the measure at issue. Schira approves of that step while arguing it does not go far enough.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Electronic Frontier Foundation

“good steps forward, but we are still far from the finish line”
Read statement

Cocoa Beach Police Department

“This tool has helped officers within our police department to solve crimes, and its removal will make some crimes more difficult to solve.”
Read statement

Flock Safety

“Rather than banning a critical public safety tool, we support thoughtful legislation and strong privacy, transparency, and accountability guardrails”
Read statement