EFF welcomes Florida removal but seeks broader limits

Digital-rights advocacy organization

“good steps forward, but we are still far from the finish line”
Open source (opens in a new tab)EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions · Electronic Frontier FoundationFlorida order discussion and final paragraph

Source and context

Analysis

EFF responds to Texas and Florida ALPR restrictions (opens in a new tab) · Electronic Frontier FoundationFlorida order discussion and final paragraph

About this source

EFF welcomes Florida's state-highway rights-of-way removal but says the policy does not reach cameras on other roads or private property.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

EFF reviewed the Florida order alongside a separate Texas funding directive.

After the quotation

It said the Florida order does not reach readers outside state-highway rights-of-way.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Responding to: Revoking local law-enforcement permits for plate readers in Florida's state-highway rights-of-way is justified by privacy and misuse concerns.

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The FDOT removal is at issue. EFF endorses that measure and calls for further restrictions rather than criticizing the removal.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Zach Schira

“I think there's still some real questions about what is going on behind the scenes”
Read statement

Cocoa Beach Police Department

“This tool has helped officers within our police department to solve crimes, and its removal will make some crimes more difficult to solve.”
Read statement

Flock Safety

“Rather than banning a critical public safety tool, we support thoughtful legislation and strong privacy, transparency, and accountability guardrails”
Read statement