Pierre Poilievre

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre
Humberland via Wikimedia Commons

Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition in the House of Commons.

What we have documented

We have documented 4 statements by Pierre Poilievre, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Will Canada and the EU define 'associate membership'?

Get an email if the planned EU-Canada summit yields terms, Canada's Parliament gets a motion or vote, or Trump acts on his tariff threat.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Pierre Poilievre

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition, posting on X

Condemned

Statement summary

After the Montreal summit closed, Poilievre said it had not reduced a single tariff or won CETA ratification from the nine holdout countries. He said talk of aligning Canada with European taxes, immigration and energy policies would do nothing to lower Canadians' living costs.

“Worse, there was lots of talk at the summit about aligning Canada with the insane European taxes, debt, immigration and anti-oil and gas policies that have left parts of Europe bankrupt and burning.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Pierre Poilievre on X: "In the real world, Canadians can't afford anything."Post text
Why we used this label

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre rejects closer alignment with European policies and calls the summit a distraction from living costs. That is opposition to the pursuit, consistent with his October 29 post.

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition, posting on X

Condemned

Statement summary

On the summit's opening day, Poilievre said Carney had spent months on talk of associate membership while Canadians struggle with costs, and that Europe had rejected it. He called the summit theatre and urged Carney to seek CETA ratification, beef access and an end to the EU's planned carbon tariff instead.

“While Canadians can't afford food and homes, Mr. Carney has distracted for months with big talk about "Associate Membership" with Europe. Now, Europe has rejected it.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Pierre Poilievre on X: "How long will this theatre go on?"Post text
Why we used this label

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre dismisses the pursuit as a distraction and argues for working within the existing trade deal. That is opposition to the proposal, consistent with his September 20 statement.

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition, speaking at a rally in Brantford, Ont.

Condemned

Statement summary

Speaking at a rally in Brantford, Ont., Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre said Canada will “never be the 28th state” of the European Union. The Canadian Press reported that he told supporters Canada already has a free trade agreement with Europe and close defence ties through NATO, but that he does not support European taxes, laws and what he called “reckless European-style immigration” being brought to Canada.

“never be the 28th state … reckless European-style immigration”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Poilievre says Canada will never be the '28th state' of the European Union (Toronto Star, Canadian Press)Full article
Why we used this label

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre rejects the proposition in this statement, saying Canada will never be a “28th state” of the Union and listing European taxes, laws and immigration he opposes. His September 16 statement was conditional on the unpublished terms; this one is a firmer objection. Only fragments of the speech are quoted by the wire report and we could not locate a recording, so the words outside the quoted fragments are the reporter’s paraphrase.

Portrait of Pierre Poilievre

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Poilievre said the terms of any arrangement have not been disclosed and that Canada already has tariff-free access to the European market for almost all its goods and services. He set out three conditions on which he would judge it a disaster: Canadians paying taxes to Brussels, following European laws they did not vote on, or adopting European immigration policy. He has separately said Parliament should decide.

“Nobody knows because he won’t say. We already have free trade with Europe … 99 per cent of our products and services can enter the European market tariff-free.” … “That leaves very little left for him to sign. You know, if he’s talking about forcing Canadians to pay taxes to Brussels bureaucrats or to follow European Union laws that we never voted on, or God forbid, to bring European policies for immigration, that would be a disaster for Canada.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)EXCLUSIVE: Poilievre sounds alarm on Carney's EU allianceVideo and posted transcript, about 1:25 to 2:45 (Poilievre's answer on the EU alliance)
Why we used this label

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre neither endorses the proposition nor rejects it outright. His stated conclusion depends on an express unresolved condition, namely what the arrangement turns out to contain, which is the definition of a conditional position. He is plainly hostile in tone and flatly critical of the process, but the criticism of secrecy targets how the proposal has been handled rather than the proposal itself. Reporting that renders his conditions as warnings that Canada would fund the EU budget, follow Brussels regulation and cede immigration control turns questions into assertions, and this record deliberately does not follow it.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage