Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.
Case
Hasan Piker said he preferred Hamas over Israel in a hypothetical, using lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau and the ADL rejected the comparison; Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes while maintaining that Israeli occupation was his overriding concern.
Case
After the Temple Israel attack, Abdul El-Sayed condemned antisemitism but linked the assailant’s actions to an Israeli airstrike that killed relatives, describing violence as a cycle. Critics said it rationalized the attack or shifted responsibility; El-Sayed denied justification and later apologized for adding context.
Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate and former Wayne County health director
Responding to
Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence
"Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms."
El-Sayed condemns antisemitism and rejects rhetoric that endangers the Jewish community.
Role at the time: Vice president of the United States, speaking at a political and economic event
Responding to
El-Sayed supports Sharia law and treats opposition to it as white supremacy.
"not only should we have Sharia law, but if you criticize it, you’re a White supremacist."
He used the attributed position to criticize El-Sayed’s political values rather than describe them neutrally.
Role at the time: Georgia Democratic county party chair
Responding to
Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp
"That softness is the reason Trump is in office. Stop being soft."
Affirmative defense of the tactic rather than a literal claim about an affair.
Role at the time: Georgia Democratic county party chair
Responding to
Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp
"Bring on the smoke."
Brief affirmative defense of the tactic.
Role at the time: Attorney and political commentator
Responding to
Jon Ossoff’s “travel with Natalie” remark insinuated that Donald Trump and Natalie Harp were having an affair.
"All Jon Ossoff said was that Donald Trump wants to fly with Natalie."
Direct challenge to the characterization that the statement itself alleged an affair.
Role at the time: Democratic political strategist
Responding to
Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.
"I thought that the attack was tough, fair, pointed. I thought the ‘with Natalie’ part was gratuitous and unnecessary and distracted and detracted from the attack."
Expressly splits approval of the political argument from disapproval of the personal phrasing.
Role at the time: President of the United States
Responding to
Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp
"He’s a Pee-wee Herman lookalike."
Trumps insult directly attacks Ossoff in the dispute.
Role at the time: United States senator and reelection candidate
Responding to
Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp
"He doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar."
Ossoffs statement directly criticizes Trump conduct and the reported travel arrangement.
Role at the time: Mike Collins U.S. Senate campaign, through spokesperson Meyer Siegfried
Responding to
Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?
"“Mike Collins fully supports holding the government accountable when federal agencies abuse their power and believes Americans who’ve been wronged by their government ought to have a path to seek justice. He does not support a blank-check fund or automatic taxpayer-funded payouts to anyone simply because they were prosecuted for January 6.”"
The campaign expressly disputes Ossoff’s characterization of Collins’s answer as support for taxpayer-funded payouts to January 6 defendants.
Role at the time: United States senator from Georgia and Democratic candidate for reelection
Responding to
Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?
"“Congressman Collins needs to immediately come out and publicly retract his support for these taxpayer-funded payouts to violent insurrectionists.”"
Ossoff directly characterizes Collins’s answer as endorsement of payments to violent insurrectionists and calls it unacceptable.
Role at the time: Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Georgia
Responding to
Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?
"“A lot of things have been politicized and weaponized. And when the federal government harms you, then yes, they have a liability to you. That’s easy, yes sir.”"
Collins’s answer is conditional on government harm and responds to a question broader than January 6 defendants, but the question was posed by a pardoned January 6 defendant who explicitly included January 6 participants.
Role at the time: Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator
Responding to
El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.
"That's how you would justify any and all political violence. That is a dangerous mindset."
The statement directly rejects the explanation-versus-justification distinction at the center of the dispute.
Role at the time: Jon Ossoff U.S. Senate campaign
Responding to
Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?
"“He wants to push you off Social Security.”"
The campaign uses the excerpt to make a critical policy characterization of Collins’s position on Social Security.
Role at the time: Spokesperson for Mike Rogers’s U.S. Senate campaign
Responding to
Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.
"Abdul was asked point blank if he’d disavow Hasan Piker’s comments, and he wouldn’t do it."
She supplied the campaign’s rationale for the accusation in a direct response to a request for evidence.
Role at the time: Pod Save America co-host and political strategist analyzing a Republican campaign ad
Responding to
Mike Rogers’s 9/11 accusation against Abdul El-Sayed
"It's not the best version of that ad, but I understand the argument."
His qualified argument concerns how the campaign ad might persuade voters. It is not support for Rogers’s claim that El-Sayed believed America deserved the attacks. The wording and speaker sequence were checked against the official full audio.
Role at the time: Pod Save America co-host discussing the general-election attack strategy
Responding to
Mike Rogers’s 9/11 accusation against Abdul El-Sayed
"I think you got to pick one."
He criticizes how the attack is constructed while acknowledging why campaigns combine unpopular associations. The classification concerns his qualified assessment of the ad, not endorsement or rejection of the belief Rogers attributed to El-Sayed. The wording and speaker sequence were checked against the official full audio.
Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, interviewed by Jacob Soboroff on All In
Responding to
Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.
"So they’re going to use Islamophobia because their ideas are tired."
The direct interview condemns divisive campaign conduct rather than just correcting attribution. Original reporting ties the answer specifically to the accusation; broader criticisms do not erase that link.
Role at the time: Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, issuing an official campaign statement
Responding to
Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.
"Never in a million years did I think that I would be running against someone who believes America deserved 9/11."
The accusation is an explicit adverse judgment about El-Sayed’s beliefs and fitness for office.
Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan, interviewed on Fox & Friends
Responding to
Appearing at a political event with Hasan Piker does not establish agreement with all of Piker’s statements.
"Of course I don’t think 9/11 was justified."
He combined rejection of the underlying sentiment with a defense of the campaign appearance; neither unconditional endorsement nor complete disavowal describes both parts.
Role at the time: Host of The Bulwark Podcast
Responding to
El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.
"Anyone who would think a statement condemning a terorrist attack on a synagogue is a 'risk' is insane and should be fired from the campaign."
The authored post directly rejects the political hesitation surrounding condemnation of the attack.
Role at the time: Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan
Responding to
El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.
"If you're having a moral crisis over whether to condemn terrorism, you're unfit for office."
The statement treats El-Sayed's contextualization as disqualifying sympathy for the assailant.
Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan
Responding to
The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.
"It was a risk."
On the recorded campaign call he positively justifies publishing his explanation as principled leadership. This is substantive defense of his decision, not merely disputing a label.
Reem Ibrahim is a writer, broadcaster, and research fellow in policy and media at Reason, covering regulation, trade, and economic freedom. She previously worked at the Institute of Economic Affairs in London and is a graduate of the London School of Economics and Political Science.
1 case and 1 statement
Evan Kilgore is an American conservative commentator and social media personality. His commentary addresses United States politics, religion, and national identity, and he describes himself publicly as an American exceptionalist.
1 case and 1 statement
Bernie Moreno is a Republican U.S. senator representing Ohio, serving in the Senate since 2025. Before entering elected office, he operated automobile dealerships in Ohio and co-founded CHAMP Titles, a company that develops digital vehicle-title systems.
1 case and 1 statement
Catherine Rampell is an economics journalist and commentator, economics editor at The Bulwark, and an anchor at MS NOW. Her work focuses on economics, politics, public policy, and immigration. She previously wrote an opinion column for The Washington Post and reported for The New York Times and PBS NewsHour.
1 case and 1 statement
Sam Stein is a political journalist and managing editor at The Bulwark. He previously served as politics editor at The Daily Beast and oversaw White House and campaign reporting at Politico, after beginning his journalism career at HuffPost.
1 case and 1 statement
James Fishback is an American businessman and Republican political commentator who ran for governor of Florida in 2026.
1 case and 1 statement
Far-right political activist, commentator, and ally of President Donald Trump.
2 cases and 1 statement
Democratic U.S. representative from Pennsylvania.
1 case and 1 statement
Will Sommer is a journalist and senior reporter at The Bulwark. He writes the False Flag newsletter and is the author of Trust the Plan.
1 case and 1 statement
Sonny Bunch is a film critic and culture editor at The Bulwark. His work covers movies and the entertainment industry.
1 case and 1 statement
John Day is a New Mexico-based attorney who provides legal analysis in Associated Press reporting.
1 case and 1 statement
Marc Goldwein is senior vice president and senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, where his work focuses on fiscal policy and the federal budget. He also teaches economics at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California's Washington program.
1 case and 1 statement
