Rogers spokesperson cites El-Sayed's refusal to disavow Piker's comments

Alyssa BrouilletSpokesperson for Mike Rogers’s U.S. Senate campaign

Brouillet defended Rogers’s accusation by pointing to El-Sayed’s refusal to disavow Piker’s comments.

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.

“Abdul was asked point blank if he’d disavow Hasan Piker’s comments, and he wouldn’t do it.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)PolitiFact documents Rogers’s accusation and his campaign’s supporting rationaleAlyssa Brouillet quotation; linked full April 7 event at 3:12:12; sources identify August 6 campaign email exchange
Abdul El-Sayed testifying at a United States Senate committee hearing in 2024

Where this statement fits

Mike Rogers’s 9/11 accusation against Abdul El-Sayed

After Michigan’s August 2026 Senate primary, Mike Rogers asserted that Abdul El-Sayed believed America deserved the September 11 attacks. His campaign defended that accusation by citing El-Sayed’s association with Hasan Piker and reluctance to disavow him. El-Sayed had explicitly rejected justifying 9/11 and argued that appearing with a person did not imply agreement. He described Rogers’s attacks as an effort to divide voters through Islamophobia. Pod Save America hosts Jon Favreau and Dan Pfeiffer later debated the strategy and construction of a related Republican ad without endorsing its factual claims.

Read the full case

Case updates

What comes next in Rogers's 9/11 claim about El-Sayed?

Get an email if Rogers repeats or revises the accusation, El-Sayed answers it again, or new ads or fact-checks add to the case.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

PolitiFact documents Rogers’s accusation and his campaign’s supporting rationale (opens in a new tab)Alyssa Brouillet quotation; linked full April 7 event at 3:12:12; sources identify August 6 campaign email exchange

About this source

Original reporting includes the campaign’s response to a request for its evidence. Brouillet’s statement is a direct quotation from that exchange, not an inference from silence. The report distinguishes El-Sayed’s explicit rejection of justifying 9/11 from his refusal to disavow an ally. We record that distinction without adopting PolitiFact’s rating as the case’s purpose.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

PolitiFact asked the Rogers campaign to substantiate the accusation; its source list dates the email exchange to August 6.

After the quotation

The report contrasted this rationale with El-Sayed’s explicit rejection of justifying 9/11. The private email itself is not reproduced in the public source; its attributed quotation is original interview reporting.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She supplied the campaign’s rationale for the accusation in a direct response to a request for evidence.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Abdul El-Sayed

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Alyssa Brouillet, Rogers spokesperson cites El-Sayed's refusal to disavow Piker's commentsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Rogers spokesperson cites El-Sayed's refusal to disavow Piker's comments
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/433-brouillet-defended-rogers-s-accusation-by-pointing-to

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Rogers spokesperson cites El-Sayed's refusal to disavow Piker's comments". First published: 2026-09-11. Last updated: 2026-09-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/433-brouillet-defended-rogers-s-accusation-by-pointing-to