Scott Jennings

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Scott Jennings on 2026 Midterm Elections, Government Ethics, and Media, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 9 topics

Statements by Scott Jennings

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: CNN senior political commentator

Condemned

Statement summary

Jennings says Republican objections to the ad are warnings, not whining, and describes concern about its defensibility and strategy.

“This issue of whining, I took some issue with that today because I don't see people whining about this. I think they are warning about this. There's a heck of a lot of Republicans in Ohio, and elsewhere, who would love to see a Republican get elected governor of Ohio, who do not believe that this is a defensible ad, nor do they believe it's a good strategy. So, whether you take it from the moral view or you take it just from the political strategy view, there's a lot of concern. That's not whining. That's warning.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip: October 21, 2026 · CNNOpening discussion, 22:00-22:10 ET
Why we used this label

Jennings treats Republican objections to the ad, on moral and strategic grounds, as legitimate warnings and rejects Vance's description of them as whining. He offers no defense of the ad.

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: Republican strategist

Condemned

Statement summary

Jennings says that putting out the ad featuring Acton's mother at the end of the race does not inspire confidence.

“not a confidence inspiring item”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)CNN NewsNight transcript: Acton campaign-ad discussion, October 2022:35:06-22:40:04 ET; Navarro and Rantz
Why we used this label

Jennings criticizes the ad's political strategy.

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: CNN senior political commentator, on CNN's The Arena with Kasie Hunt

Condemned

Statement summary

On CNN, commentator Scott Jennings said the text messages reported by the Journal were extremely unseemly and had to be investigated, though they might not be illegal, and said Guilfoyle should consider what to tell Trump and Rubio about her future.

“it's extremely unseemly, these text messages. There's no other way to read it. Again, may not be illegal. Has to be investigated. ... But if I were in her shoes right now, I would be considering what I wanted to tell the president, the secretary of state about my future because When you're in an appointed position like this and you hold a position of trust with the government, and then you become a distraction or an embarrassment to your principals, that's a problem.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)The Arena with Kasie Hunt, October 8, 2026 (CNN transcript) · CNNOpening panel on the Journal report; Scott Jennings's answer after Kasie Hunt asks how the request would go over in Trump's world
Why we used this label

The reference point is Eric Deters's allegation that Kimberly Guilfoyle, shortly before her July 2025 Senate confirmation hearing, asked him to pay her $100,000 American Express bill while offering to help him reach senior Trump administration officials. Condemned: Jennings calls the messages "extremely unseemly" and says "There's no other way to read it." The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because his remark that the conduct "may not be illegal" and needs investigation concerns legality and process, not his negative judgment of the messages.

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: CNN political commentator

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Jennings portrays Crockett's absence from Talarico's campaign as a problem for Democrats, then says he understands why she might be upset after the primary.

“Jasmine Crockett does nothing for James Talarico, has been attacking the Democratic Party after that very divisive primary.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)CNN The Arena panel on Texas Senate party unity16:10 ET, Jennings and Hinojosa exchange on Crockett
Why we used this label

Jennings criticizes her lack of campaign help while also expressing sympathy for her position.

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: CNN political commentator

Condemned

Response to this claim

Ossoff’s remark was sexist and misogynistic because it reduced a female White House aide’s professional role to a sexual implication.

“What a coward. Own your sexist joke, bro.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)MAGA erupts over Jon Ossoff’s sexist jab at Trump aide Natalie HarpEmbedded social posts and quoted reactions
Why we used this label

Directly condemns the wording as sexist.

Portrait of Scott Jennings

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator

Condemned

Response to this claim

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

“That's how you would justify any and all political violence. That is a dangerous mindset.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Scott Jennings Podcast — Radical Left Lunacy01:02:50
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the explanation-versus-justification distinction at the center of the dispute.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

Relationship to this case: Speaker

After the Temple Israel attack, Abdul El-Sayed condemned antisemitism but linked the assailant’s actions to an Israeli airstrike that killed relatives, describing violence as a cycle. Critics said it rationalized the attack or shifted responsibility; El-Sayed denied justification and later apologized for adding context.

AntisemitismIsraelUpdated