Catherine Rampell

Portrait of Catherine Rampell
New America

Catherine Rampell is an economics journalist and commentator, economics editor at The Bulwark, and an anchor at MS NOW. Her work focuses on economics, politics, public policy, and immigration. She previously wrote an opinion column for The Washington Post and reported for The New York Times and PBS NewsHour.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Catherine Rampell on 2026 Midterm Elections, Government Spending, and Law Enforcement. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Catherine Rampell

Portrait of Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell

Role at the time: Economics journalist commenting on her own X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Rampell questioned the credibility of Trump's election-contingent dividend by comparing it with earlier promised payments.

“no checks have been issued”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Catherine Rampell compares Trump's election pledge with previous promised checks · Catherine RampellOriginal post or statement body
Why we used this label

The post presents a negative assessment of the pledge's credibility, not a legal conclusion about vote-buying.

Portrait of Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell

Role at the time: Columnist, The Washington Post; Bulwark contributor

Condemned

Statement summary

Catherine Rampell said the FBI's lowered hiring standards reflect prioritizing loyalty to Trump over effectiveness.

“CBS had a story about how they are having to lower the recruiting standards for the FBI... no longer automatically disqualifying if a person... has hired a prostitute, stolen from a previous employer, or even engaged in beastiality... they're no longer optimizing on who is the most effective... but rather who is willing to pledge personal loyalty to Donald Trump.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Bulwark panel on the FBI hiring-standards change
Why we used this label

Rampell frames the policy as no longer optimizing for effectiveness but for personal loyalty to Trump, an express condemnation of the hiring-standards change.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.