Victoria Spartz

Portrait of Victoria Spartz
House Creative ServicesSourcePublic domain (U.S. federal government)Original image retained; resized only.

United States Representative and Republican candidate for U.S. House in Indiana's 5th district.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Victoria Spartz

Portrait of Victoria Spartz

Victoria Spartz

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Indiana 5th district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Victoria Spartz voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Victoria Spartz

Victoria Spartz

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Victoria Spartz joined the Flock-Off Act as an original sponsor. The bill would withhold federal funds from covered camera systems, subject to exceptions.

“no Federal funds may be obligated or expended, directly or indirectly”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221, introduced textIntroducers and Section 2 federal funding prohibition
Why we used this label

The bill restricts federal funding, not all state, local or private ALPR use.

Portrait of Victoria Spartz

Victoria Spartz

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Victoria Spartz signed a letter urging nationwide NFA non-enforcement to avoid unequal treatment and requesting that DOJ decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.

“Action: Signed an August 11 letter urging DOJ to apply the NFA ruling nationwide, decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Forty-seven members of Congress urge nationwide NFA non-enforcementPages 1-2, policy request; pages 3-8, all 47 signatures
Why we used this label

The reference is nationwide NFA non-enforcement. Signing a letter expressly requesting that policy supports it, even though the letter predates ATF's October announcement.

Portrait of Victoria Spartz

Victoria Spartz

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Indiana at the statement date.

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Spartz opposes U.S. nation-building and insists on a clear strategy, while rejecting diplomatic negotiations with dictators and arguing that they understand weapons.

“I don’t support us being engaged in nation-building — it’s up to the people of each nation, & we must have clear strategy.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Spartz rejects nation-building while arguing for forceComplete original @RepSpartz written post, February 28, 2026, 2:11 PM displayed; accompanying video not used as quotation evidence
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Spartz opposes U.S. nation-building and insists on a clear strategy, while rejecting diplomatic negotiations with dictators and arguing that they understand weapons.

Topics in this coverage