Victoria Spartz backs Flock-Off federal funding limit
U.S. representative
“no Federal funds may be obligated or expended, directly or indirectly”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221, introduced textIntroducers and Section 2 federal funding prohibition
Source and context
Original text
Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221, introduced text (opens in a new tab)Introducers and Section 2 federal funding prohibition
About this source
Introduced bill names its original sponsors and prohibits federal funds for covered camera systems, with stated exceptions.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Victoria Spartz was named among the bill's original sponsors.
After the quotation
The introduced text contains exceptions and does not prohibit all plate-reader systems.
How this statement is classified
Mixed or conditional
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The bill restricts federal funding, not all state, local or private ALPR use.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement