The Dispute Index

Mike Lee

Portrait of Mike Lee
U.S. Senate / U.S. Congress

United States Senator (Republican) from Utah.

X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)Facebook (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 8 statements by Mike Lee, in 7 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Mike Lee

Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator for Utah

Condemned

Statement summary

Lee joins the argument that discipline for disputed legal advocacy infringes speech rights.

“Action: Submitted a joint amicus brief with Ted Cruz urging Supreme Court review of John Eastman's California disbarment.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Brief for U.S. Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee as Amici Curiae in Support of PetitionerNo. 26-336; Interest of Amici Curiae and Summary of the Argument
Why we used this label

Relative to Eastman's disbarment, the brief Lee joined argues that the sanction punishes protected legal advocacy and fails strict scrutiny. That criticizes the disbarment itself rather than how it is described.

Read statementFull case: Ted Cruz and Mike Lee urge Supreme Court review of John Eastman's disbarment
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Utah and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee; co-sponsor with Sen. Chris Coons of the NDO Fairness Act

Condemned

Statement summary

In his questioning of Smith, Sen. Mike Lee said the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section had warned that going after members' phone records carried litigation risks because of constitutional privileges, and that Smith never told Chief Judge James Boasberg that he was "targeting 19 members of a coordinate branch of government." Smith replied that Boasberg signed the nondisclosure orders, not the subpoenas, and that under department policy his office did not tell the judge whose toll records were sought. Lee said he and Sen. Chris Coons have a bipartisan NDO Fairness Act, that "There should be an articulated basis for secrecy when you're asking for a gag order," and that Smith's conduct "arguably makes what Richard Nixon did in Watergate look like a Sunday picnic."

“the Department of Justice's own Public Integrity Section, it did give you explicit warnings that going after the phone records of members of the legislative branch carried what they referred to as litigation risks due to these constitutional privileges. ... you never actually told Chief Judge Boasberg that you were targeting 19 members of a coordinate branch of government, the legislative branch. ... There should be an articulated basis for secrecy when you're asking for a gag order. ... in a way that arguably makes what Richard Nixon did in Watergate look like a Sunday picnic.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters (hearing video) · Senate Committee on the JudiciarySen. Mike Lee's questions to Smith on toll records, the Public Integrity Section and nondisclosure orders, about 2:36:32 to 2:39:30 and 2:41:43 to 2:43:03 on the archived video timeline
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper. Lee said the Public Integrity Section had warned of litigation risks, that Smith "never actually told Chief Judge Boasberg that you were targeting 19 members of a coordinate branch of government," and that the conduct "arguably makes what Richard Nixon did in Watergate look like a Sunday picnic." That rejects the collection as improper, so we labeled it Condemned.

Read statementFull case: Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Utah

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Lee defended his objection to fast-track passage, calling the proposal partisan scaremongering and saying it should go through the committee process.

“through the appropriate committee process”
Open source (opens in a new tab)US senator blocks bill to ban Trump from demolishing Kennedy Center without Congress's approval · The GuardianParagraph quoting Sen. Lee near the end of the report
Why we used this label

Lee defended blocking immediate passage by challenging the expedited procedure. He did not say whether he supports demolishing the Kennedy Center.

Read statementFull case: Was Mike Lee right to block fast-track passage of the Kennedy Center protection bill?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator for Utah, posting on his personal X account.

Condemned

Statement summary

Mike Lee mocked Flock cameras asking to be left alone. His comment quoted Chip Roy's description of mass surveillance asking for privacy.

“Flock cameras just “want to be left alone” 🤔”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Mike Lee comments on Flock cameras asking for privacyOriginal @BasedMikeLee post; timestamp 9:30 PM September 26, 2026, Eastern time
Why we used this label

Lee's sarcastic comment criticizes the contrast between Flock surveillance and a request for privacy. He specifies no ban, warrant requirement or other policy remedy.

Read statementFull case: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Utah

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Mike Lee voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Mike Lee signed a letter urging nationwide NFA non-enforcement to avoid unequal treatment and requesting that DOJ decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.

“Action: Signed an August 11 letter urging DOJ to apply the NFA ruling nationwide, decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Forty-seven members of Congress urge nationwide NFA non-enforcementPages 1-2, policy request; pages 3-8, all 47 signatures
Why we used this label

The reference is nationwide NFA non-enforcement. Signing a letter expressly requesting that policy supports it, even though the letter predates ATF's October announcement.

Read statementFull case: Was ATF right to stop enforcing registration requirements for silencers and short-barreled guns?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Utah

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Mike Lee voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Mike Lee

Mike Lee

Role at the time: U.S. senator from Utah, posting on his X account

Condemned

Statement summary

Lee says the Pentagon should not disparage the beliefs of Americans willing to die for their country, objecting to its treatment of Latter-day Saints.

“The Pentagon shouldn’t disparage the beliefs of Americans willing to die for their country”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Mike Lee criticizes the religious-code treatment of Latter-day SaintsComplete post, June 7,2026,23:44:27UTC.
Why we used this label

The reference is the military religious-code change. Lee criticizes the list's treatment of Latter-day Saints as disparagement.

Read statementFull case: Hegseth cuts military religious affiliation codes from over 200 to 31; American Atheists and Interfaith Alliance object

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage