Brian Fitzpatrick

Portrait of Brian Fitzpatrick
Kristie Boyd, U.S. House Office of Photography

United States Representative and Republican candidate for U.S. House in Pennsylvania's 1st district.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Brian Fitzpatrick

Portrait of Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

Role at the time: U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania, in a post on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick said he would introduce bipartisan legislation, the Ronald Reagan Peace Through Strength Act, to block any and all purchases of Russian oil, and that it would be forced to the Floor via discharge and would pass overwhelmingly.

“We will be introducing bipartisan legislation to block any and all purchases of Russian oil. It will be called the “Ronald Reagan Peace Through Strength Act.” It will be forced to the Floor via discharge and it will pass overwhelmingly.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick's post announcing the Ronald Reagan Peace Through Strength Act (X post) · Brian FitzpatrickFull post, October 10, 3:38 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether the U.S. should ease sanctions on Russian diesel to lower fuel prices, as the administration did on October 9. Fitzpatrick says he will introduce legislation "to block any and all purchases of Russian oil" and force it to the floor, a direct effort to reverse the easing. We labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Challenged characterization; it loses because he proposes to stop the purchases rather than dispute how they are described.

Portrait of Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Pennsylvania 1st district

Condemned

Statement summary

Brian K. Fitzpatrick voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

Role at the time: U.S. representative and 2026 Republican House candidate in Pennsylvania

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Fitzpatrick said license-plate readers can help police, while urging federal standards against unauthorized tracking.

“Law enforcement should have every effective tool it needs to protect our communities”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Battleground congressional candidates in Pennsylvania talk Flock camerasOriginal candidate interviews and quoted campaign statements; syndicated text
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Fitzpatrick said law enforcement should have every effective tool it needs and urged federal standards against unauthorized tracking. Supporting use with safeguards fits Mixed or conditional.

Portrait of Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Pennsylvania's 1st Congressional District

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

After voting against earlier war powers resolutions, Fitzpatrick voted for H.Con.Res. 86 on June 3, 2026, saying the War Powers Act's 60-day limit legally required bringing the matter to Congress, while also arguing 'the world is a safer place after Iran's nuclear capabilities have been degraded.'

“The law, as it is currently written, requires that the matter now be brought to Congress. That is why I voted in favor of today's resolution. Until my Resolution is passed by Congress, or until the United States Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the War Powers Act of 1973, we must abide by the law as it is currently written.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Fitzpatrick vote helps measure to halt Iran war finally pass House
Why we used this label

Votes to end unauthorized hostilities on legal-procedural grounds while praising the operation's results: supportive of the strikes, opposed to their continuation without authorization.

Topics in this coverage